8. The Acceptability and Feasibility of Corneal Confocal Microscopy to Detect Diabetic Neuropathy in Children: A Pilot Study (632-P)

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-62
Author(s):  
Mitra Tavakoli ◽  
Rayaz Malik
2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 630-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. C. Sellers ◽  
I. Clark ◽  
M. Tavakoli ◽  
H. J. Dean ◽  
J. McGavock ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 254-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitra Tavakoli ◽  
Maria Mitu-Pretorian ◽  
Ioannis N. Petropoulos ◽  
Hassan Fadavi ◽  
Omar Asghar ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Edwards ◽  
Nicola Pritchard ◽  
Dimitrios Vagenas ◽  
Anthony Russell ◽  
Rayaz A Malik ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgeta Inceu ◽  
Horea Demea ◽  
Ioan Andrei Veresiu

AbstractBackground and aims. This article aims to compare corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) with acknowledged tests of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), to assess corneal nerve morphology using CCM in diabetic patients, and to underline possible correlations between clinical and biological parameters, diabetes duration and DPN severity. Material and methods. A total of 90 patients with type 2 diabetes were included in the study for whom we measured anthropometric parameters and we performed laboratory measurements (tests). The patients were assessed for diabetic peripheral neuropathy using Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing (SWMT), Rapid-Current Perception Threshold (R-CPT) measurements using the Neurometer®, and CCM. We stratified the patients according to DPN severity, based on four parameters extracted after image analysis. Results. A higher percentage of patients were diagnosed with DPN using CCM (88.8%), compared with SWMT and R-CPT measurement (17.8% and 40% respectively). The incidence of DPN detected with CCM was considerable in patients with normal protective sensation and with normal R-CPT values. Conclusions. Our study showed that corneal confocal microscopy is a useful noninvasive method for diabetic neuropathy assessement in early stages. It was proven to directly quantify small fiber pathology, and to stratify neuropathic severity, and therefore can be used as a new, reliable tool in the diagnosis, clinical evaluation, and follow-up of peripheral diabetic neuropathy.


Diabetes Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. dc210476
Author(s):  
Bruce A. Perkins ◽  
Leif Erik Lovblom ◽  
Evan J.H. Lewis ◽  
Vera Bril ◽  
Maryam Ferdousi ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1179-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitra Tavakoli ◽  
Ioannis N. Petropoulos ◽  
Rayaz A. Malik

Diabetologia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan M. Williams ◽  
Davide Borroni ◽  
Rongjun Liu ◽  
Yitian Zhao ◽  
Jiong Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims/hypothesis Corneal confocal microscopy is a rapid non-invasive ophthalmic imaging technique that identifies peripheral and central neurodegenerative disease. Quantification of corneal sub-basal nerve plexus morphology, however, requires either time-consuming manual annotation or a less-sensitive automated image analysis approach. We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence-based, deep learning algorithm for the quantification of nerve fibre properties relevant to the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy and to compare it with a validated automated analysis program, ACCMetrics. Methods Our deep learning algorithm, which employs a convolutional neural network with data augmentation, was developed for the automated quantification of the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy. The algorithm was trained using a high-end graphics processor unit on 1698 corneal confocal microscopy images; for external validation, it was further tested on 2137 images. The algorithm was developed to identify total nerve fibre length, branch points, tail points, number and length of nerve segments, and fractal numbers. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to determine the AUC for ACCMetrics and our algorithm for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy. Results The intraclass correlation coefficients for our algorithm were superior to those for ACCMetrics for total corneal nerve fibre length (0.933 vs 0.825), mean length per segment (0.656 vs 0.325), number of branch points (0.891 vs 0.570), number of tail points (0.623 vs 0.257), number of nerve segments (0.878 vs 0.504) and fractals (0.927 vs 0.758). In addition, our proposed algorithm achieved an AUC of 0.83, specificity of 0.87 and sensitivity of 0.68 for the classification of participants without (n = 90) and with (n = 132) neuropathy (defined by the Toronto criteria). Conclusions/interpretation These results demonstrated that our deep learning algorithm provides rapid and excellent localisation performance for the quantification of corneal nerve biomarkers. This model has potential for adoption into clinical screening programmes for diabetic neuropathy. Data availability The publicly shared cornea nerve dataset (dataset 1) is available at http://bioimlab.dei.unipd.it/Corneal%20Nerve%20Tortuosity%20Data%20Set.htm and http://bioimlab.dei.unipd.it/Corneal%20Nerve%20Data%20Set.htm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document