Comparative study on the equivalent linear and the fully nonlinear site response analysis approaches

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Majdeddin Mir Mohammad Hosseini ◽  
Mojdeh Asadollahi Pajouh
2014 ◽  
Vol 275 ◽  
pp. 107-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandrakanth Bolisetti ◽  
Andrew S. Whittaker ◽  
H. Benjamin Mason ◽  
Ibrahim Almufti ◽  
Michael Willford

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 1867-1887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Carlton ◽  
Kohji Tokimatsu

We compared the results of equivalent linear (ELA) and nonlinear site response analyses (NLA) and found that the differences between the values of the peak ground acceleration ( PGA), peak ground velocity ( PGV), Arias intensity ( I a), significant duration ( D5–75), and response spectrum for periods between 0.025 s and 2 s predicted by each method are non-negligible for maximum shear strain values predicted by ELA ( γ max, ELA) greater than 0.04% to 1.0%. As γ max, ELA increases, ELA in general predict smaller shear strain and D5–75 values, and larger PGA, PGV, I a, mean period, and response spectral values for periods less than 0.1 s and periods near the natural site period than NLA. To help researchers and practitioners decide when to use ELA and/or NLA, we developed a model to estimate γ max, ELA before conducting a site response analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document