scholarly journals A case of rupture of right coronary sinus of Valsalva aneurysm after aortic root replacement due to Stanford type A aortic dissection 15 years ago

Author(s):  
Satoshi Koto ◽  
Koichiro Imai ◽  
Ryotaro Yamada ◽  
Teruyoshi Kume ◽  
Yoji Neishi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 1082
Author(s):  
María Martín ◽  
Rubén Alvarez-Cabo ◽  
Manuel Barreiro ◽  
Cecilia Corros ◽  
Ana García Campos ◽  
...  




Author(s):  
Laichun Song ◽  
Yang Gao ◽  
Ming Xu ◽  
Bo Wang ◽  
Xiaoyong Li ◽  
...  

Purpose. The optimal surgical strategy of aortic root in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of “Sleeve” sinus Valsalva repair for AAD limited to the non-coronary sinus or partial left and right coronary sinus without involvement coronary artery ostia. Methods: From Sep 2016 to Mar 2019, 20 patients with AAD involving non-coronary sinus or partial left and right coronary sinus Valsalva underwent “Sleeve” sinus Valsalva repair . Multi slice spiral computed tomography angiography (MSCT) and three dimensional reconstruction were routinely performed in all patients to assess the maximal diameters of each segment of the aorta. Results. There was no early death in hospital and one death during the 30-day postoperative period. Re-thoracotomy due to bleeding was necessary in only 1 patient and no bleeding was related to the proximal anastomosis. The post-operative drainage was 390.5±229.3mL. During the following-up, the echocardiography showed the normal sinus of Valsalva and aortic valvular function. The computed tomography angiography showed normal aortic root without endovascular leak or dissection around the sinus of Valsalva. All patients were free from reoperation. Conclusions. “Sleeve” sinus Valsalva repair with Dacron patch for aortic dissection limited to the non-coronary sinus or partial left and right coronary sinus without involvement coronary artery ostia was technically feasible and safe.



Authorea ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Salmasi ◽  
Abinash Panda ◽  
Philip Hartley ◽  
Ashiq Abdulkhader ◽  
Ahmed Osman ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hug Aubin ◽  
Payam Akhyari ◽  
Philipp Rellecke ◽  
Christina Pawlitza ◽  
George Petrov ◽  
...  


2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.G. Leyh ◽  
S. Fischer ◽  
K. Kallenbach ◽  
T. Kofidis ◽  
K. Pethig ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. E828-E832
Author(s):  
Ahmed Elsharkawy ◽  
Ashraf El Midany ◽  
Ahmed Elwakeel ◽  
Eman Mahmoud ◽  
Ahmed Mohammed ◽  
...  

Background: Type A aortic dissection is a challenging surgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Many techniques have evolved to repair the dissected sinus segments and restore aortic valve dynamics. Herein, we evaluate the early outcome of a novel technique for reconstruction of dissected aortic root. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 300 patients to evaluate the early results of repair of dissected root in type A aortic dissection. The mean age was 59.65±8.52 years, and 76% of patients were males. All patients had four standard steps for aortic reconstruction: 1) commissural resuspension; 2) right coronary sinus reinforcement with pericardial and Dacron bands; 3) non-coronary sinus reinforcement using external Dacron patch; 4) circumferential inversion of adventitial layer of the root. Patients were followed up clinically, echocardiographically, and by CT scan. Results: The in-hospital mortality was 8%. The mean cross-clamp time was 120±30 minutes, and circulatory arrest time was 25+10 minutes. Twenty-seven patients (9%) experienced postoperative complications, including bleeding and acute kidney injury. During a mean follow-up time of 48±12 months, there were no recurrent aortic dissection, aortic dilatation, pseudoaneurysm, or progression of aortic regurgitation during the entire study period. Conclusions: This reconstructive technique technically is undemanding, feasible, safe, and durable with good early results. A larger cohort of patients with longer period of follow up should generate a more powerful evaluation of this technique.



Circulation ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 106 (12_suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer G. Leyh ◽  
Stefan Fischer ◽  
Klaus Kallenbach ◽  
Theo Kofidis ◽  
Klaus Pethig ◽  
...  

Background Valve-sparing surgery including the replacement of the sinus of valsalvae were initially meant to be promising approaches in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. However, the long-term outcome after valve-sparing aortic root replacement in acute type A dissection is currently the subject of intense debate, and the evidence reported in the literature is sparse. Here we report on our experience on valve sparing aortic root replacement inpatients with acute type A dissection. Methods From August 1995 to November 2000, 30 patients with acute type A dissection received valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Two different techniques were performed: the “remodeling” technique, first described by Yacoub in 1983 (8 patients) and the “reimplantation” technique, initially described by David and Feindel, in 1992 (22 patients). Endpoints of the study were early and late mortality, as well as aortic valve-related complications and reoperations. Results The mean follow-up time was 22.6±15.4 months. The overall 30 day mortality was 17% (5/29) and the late mortality 4% (1/24). During the observation period, 4 patients had to be reoperated (n=3) for acute aortic valve regurgitation after aortic root remodeling and for acute aortic valve endocarditis (n=1) after aortic root reimplantation. In the 3 patients with acute aortic valve regurgitation, symptoms occurred 44, 24, and 17 months after the initial operation in these patients. Intraoperatively prolapsing aortic leaflets because of commissural detachment was found in all 3 cases. In all other patients the latest echocardiographic follow-up examination revealed freedom from aortic regugitation higher than grade 1. Conclusions The high failure rate of aortic root remodeling inpatients with acute type A aortic dissection is discouraging. Whether this technique should be applied in acute type A aortic dissection is questionable. In contrast, aortic root reimplantation lead to favorable midterm outcome. Thus, we recommend consideration of this technique for surgical treatment of patients with acute type A aortic dissection.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document