scholarly journals Automated Breast Ultrasound: Technical Aspects, Impact on Breast Screening, and Future Perspectives

Author(s):  
Iris Allajbeu ◽  
Sarah E Hickman ◽  
Nicholas Payne ◽  
Penelope Moyle ◽  
Kathryn Taylor ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose of Review Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is a three-dimensional imaging technique, used as a supplemental screening tool in women with dense breasts. This review considers the technical aspects, pitfalls, and the use of ABUS in screening and clinical practice, together with new developments and future perspectives. Recent Findings ABUS has been approved in the USA and Europe as a screening tool for asymptomatic women with dense breasts in addition to mammography. Supplemental US screening has high sensitivity for cancer detection, especially early-stage invasive cancers, and reduces the frequency of interval cancers. ABUS has similar diagnostic performance to handheld ultrasound (HHUS) and is designed to overcome the drawbacks of operator dependence and poor reproducibility. Concerns with ABUS, like HHUS, include relatively high recall rates and lengthy reading time when compared to mammography. ABUS is a new technique with unique features; therefore, adequate training is required to improve detection and reduce false positives. Computer-aided detection may reduce reading times and improve cancer detection. Other potential applications of ABUS include local staging, treatment response evaluation, breast density assessment, and integration of radiomics. Summary ABUS provides an efficient, reproducible, and comprehensive supplemental imaging technique in breast screening. Developments with computer-aided detection may improve the sensitivity and specificity as well as radiologist confidence and reduce reading times, making this modality acceptable in large volume screening centers.

Author(s):  
Amera Abd Elsalam Mostafa ◽  
Mohamed Adel Eltomey ◽  
Ashraf Mohammed Elaggan ◽  
Amel A. Hashish

Abstract Background Breast cancer is a major health problem, being the most common cancer in women. Early detection of breast cancer aims to the reduction of mortality and morbidity rates. Conventional screening methods include mammography and ultrasonography; however, both modalities have their limitations. Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is a recent technological advancement in the field of breast imaging having the benefit of standardization of the scans and lack of operator dependence as in conventional handheld ultrasound scans. The aim of this work was to report our initial experience of the added value of ABUS as a breast screening tool. The study included 200 patients who had screening mammograms, ultrasound, and ABUS. Results A significant difference was found between the number of lesions detected by ABUS and conventional ultrasound. A significant difference was found between lesions detected by ABUS and mammography which was most evident in patients with dense breasts. Conclusions ABUS is a valuable tool in the screening of the breast with improved lesion detection, especially in patients with dense breasts.


2017 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 54-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C.M. van Zelst ◽  
T. Tan ◽  
B. Platel ◽  
M. de Jong ◽  
A. Steenbakkers ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise M Chough ◽  
Wendie A Berg ◽  
Andriy I Bandos ◽  
Grace Y Rathfon ◽  
Christiane M Hakim ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To assess prospectively the interpretative performance of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) as a supplemental screening after digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) or as a standalone screening of women with dense breast tissue. Methods Under an IRB-approved protocol (written consent required), women with dense breasts prospectively underwent concurrent baseline DBT and ABUS screening. Examinations were independently evaluated, in opposite order, by two of seven Mammography Quality Standards Act–qualified radiologists, with the primary radiologist arbitrating disagreements and making clinical management recommendations. We report results for 1111 screening examinations (598 first year and 513 second year) for which all diagnostic workups are complete. Imaging was also retrospectively reviewed for all cancers. Statistical assessments used a 0.05 significance level and accounted for correlation between participants’ examinations. Results Of 1111 women screened, primary radiologists initially “recalled” based on DBT alone (6.6%, 73/1111, CI: 5.2%–8.2%), of which 20 were biopsied, yielding 6/8 total cancers. Automated breast ultrasound increased recalls overall to 14.4% (160/1111, CI: 12.4%–16.6%), with 27 total biopsies, yielding 1 additional cancer. Double reading of DBT alone increased the recall rate to 10.7% (119/1111), with 21 biopsies, with no improvement in cancer detection. Double reading ABUS increased the recall rate to 15.2% (169/1111, CI: 13.2%–17.5%) of women, of whom 22 were biopsied, yielding the detection of 7 cancers, including one seen only on double reading ABUS. Inter-radiologist agreement was similar for recall recommendations from DBT (κ = 0.24, CI: 0.14–0.34) and ABUS (κ = 0.23, CI: 0.15–0.32). Integrated assessments from both readers resulted in a recall rate of 15.1% (168/1111, CI: 13.1%–17.4%). Conclusion Supplemental or standalone ABUS screening detected cancers not seen on DBT, but substantially increased noncancer recall rates.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 866-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Wang ◽  
Na Wang ◽  
Min Xu ◽  
Junxiong Yu ◽  
Chenchen Qin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Davis ◽  
Julie Duncan ◽  
Ryann Milne-Price ◽  
Loren Colson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document