The Role of Screening Mammography in Addressing Disparities in Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes

Author(s):  
Kimberly M. M. Isakov ◽  
Lisa Newman ◽  
Kemi Babagbemi
Author(s):  
Marissa B. Lawson ◽  
Christoph I. Lee ◽  
Daniel S. Hippe ◽  
Shasank Chennupati ◽  
Catherine R. Fedorenko ◽  
...  

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine factors associated with receipt of screening mammography by insured women before breast cancer diagnosis, and subsequent outcomes. Patients and Methods: Using claims data from commercial and federal payers linked to a regional SEER registry, we identified women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2007 to 2017 and determined receipt of screening mammography within 1 year before diagnosis. We obtained patient and tumor characteristics from the SEER registry and assigned each woman a socioeconomic deprivation score based on residential address. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations of patient and tumor characteristics with late-stage disease and nonreceipt of mammography. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to identify predictors of subsequent mortality. Results: Among 7,047 women, 69% (n=4,853) received screening mammography before breast cancer diagnosis. Compared with women who received mammography, those with no mammography had a higher proportion of late-stage disease (34% vs 10%) and higher 5-year mortality (18% vs 6%). In multivariable modeling, late-stage disease was most associated with nonreceipt of mammography (odds ratio [OR], 4.35; 95% CI, 3.80–4.98). The Cox model indicated that nonreceipt of mammography predicted increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; 95% CI, 1.64–2.43), independent of late-stage disease at diagnosis (HR, 5.00; 95% CI, 4.10–6.10), Charlson comorbidity index score ≥1 (HR, 2.75; 95% CI, 2.26–3.34), and negative estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor status (HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.67–2.61). Nonreceipt of mammography was associated with younger age (40–49 vs 50–59 years; OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.45–1.96) and increased socioeconomic deprivation (OR, 1.05 per decile increase; 95% CI, 1.03–1.07). Conclusions: In a cohort of insured women diagnosed with breast cancer, nonreceipt of screening mammography was significantly associated with late-stage disease and mortality, suggesting that interventions to further increase uptake of screening mammography may improve breast cancer outcomes.


Pathobiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony S.-Y. Leong ◽  
Zhengping Zhuang

In Vivo ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 355-359
Author(s):  
PIERO FREGATTI ◽  
MARCO GIPPONI ◽  
RAQUEL DIAZ ◽  
RAFFAELE DE ROSA ◽  
FEDERICA MURELLI ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hui Li ◽  
Han-Han Li ◽  
Qian Chen ◽  
Yu-Yang Wang ◽  
Chang Chang Fan ◽  
...  

Abnormal cell proliferation caused by abnormal transcription regulation mechanismseems to be one of the reasons for the progression of breast cancer and also thepathological basis. MicroRNA 142 5p (miR 142 5p) is a low expressed miRNA inbreast cancer. T he role of MKL1's regulation of DNMT1 in breast cancer cellproliferation and migration is still unclear. MKL 1 (myocardi n related transcriptionfactor A) can bind to the conserved cis regulatory element CC (A/T) 6GG (called CarGbox) in the promoter to re gulate the transcription of miR 142 5p. The expression ofmiR 142 5p and MKL 1 are positively correlated. In addition, it has been proved thatDNMT1 is the target of miR 142 5p, which inhibits the expression of DNMT1 bytargeting the 3'UTR of DNMT1, thereby forming a feedback loop and inhibiting themigration and proliferation of breast cancer. Our data provide important and novelinsights into the MKL 1/miR 142 5p/DNMT1/maspin signaling pathway, and maybecome a new idea for breast cancer diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.


2008 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. S104-S108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Rovera ◽  
Gianlorenzo Dionigi ◽  
Marina Marelli ◽  
Alberta Ferrari ◽  
Giorgio Limonta ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19146-e19146
Author(s):  
Ying Liu ◽  
Aliza Gordon ◽  
Michael Eleff ◽  
John Barron ◽  
Winnie Chi

e19146 Background: Guidelines for optimal frequency of screening mammography (annual, biennial, never/choice of patient) vary by professional society, due to mixed or insufficient evidence regarding its benefits and harms. Little evidence exists on the impact of screening frequency, rather than any screening, on health outcomes. In this study, we measured differences in cancer stage at diagnosis, treatment rendered, mortality, and cost of treatment for women with different numbers of screenings prior to breast cancer diagnosis. Methods: Utilizing administrative claims, we identified 25,492 women aged 44 or older with various numbers of mammographic screening ≥ 11 months apart during the four years prior to their incident breast cancer diagnosis from 2010 to 2018. Outcomes were assessed during the six months following diagnosis. Regression models were used to compare women with differing numbers of mammograms (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4/5), adjusting for demographic characteristics and baseline comorbidities. Results: More screenings were associated with less advanced cancer at diagnosis, higher rates in lumpectomy and radiation, lower rates in mastectomy and chemotherapy, lower costs and mortality within 6 months post diagnosis (Table). Results were similar in a subgroup with only women aged 44-49 at diagnosis (not shown). Conclusions: Increased frequency of screening mammography is associated with earlier breast cancer stage at diagnosis, less toxic and invasive treatment, lower mortality, and lower cost, including for women under age 50. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document