Patient End of Endotracheal Tube as Gateway for Transbuccal Approach in Internal Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture: A Technical Note

Author(s):  
Prathamesh Bhujbal ◽  
Santhosh Kumar Rao ◽  
Pushkar Waknis
2020 ◽  
pp. 194338752090489
Author(s):  
Mrunalini Ramanathan ◽  
Elavenil Panneerselvam ◽  
Sriraam Kasi Ganesh ◽  
Krishna Kumar Raja

Mandibular angle fractures are frequently encountered as they constitute an area of weakness. Complications after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of angle fractures commonly arise due to improper reduction and fixation methods that fail to counteract the dynamic muscle forces present in this region. Conventional reduction methods such as digital manipulation, intermaxillary fixation, towel clip traction, and wiring are associated with various limitations. This technical note highlights the fabrication and use of a computer-aided designing/computer-aided manufacturing–generated splint for ORIF of a superiorly displaced mandibular angle fracture. The splint consisted of 2 components: (1) a distal tooth-borne component to guide the teeth into maximum intercuspation and (2) a proximal bone-borne component to reduce the angle fracture. This composite splint facilitates simultaneous restoration of occlusion as well as reduction of mandibular angle fractures. The advantages of this technique include the following: (1) easy fabrication of splint, (2) easy and precise anatomical reduction of angle fracture, and (3) less operative time.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 12166-12177
Author(s):  
Beatriz Nogueira Dos Santos ◽  
Lucas Leverson Lisboa Da Costa ◽  
Alice Christinne de Alencar Lemos ◽  
Amanda Marinho Chaves Costa ◽  
Letícia Sandes de Albuquerque Silva ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-320
Author(s):  
F. P. S. Guastaldi ◽  
A. P. Martini ◽  
E. P. Rocha ◽  
E. Hochuli-Vieira ◽  
A. C. Guastaldi

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Spinelli ◽  
Davide Lazzeri ◽  
Francesco Arcuri ◽  
Domenico Valente ◽  
Tommaso Agostini

Fractures of the mandibular angle account for 23 to 42% of all facial fractures with a high complication rate (0–32%). Although the ideal treatment remains debatable, two main procedures are commonly used to manage the majority of mandibular angle fractures that are open reduction and internal fixation by a noncompression miniplate placed on the external oblique ridge with or without a second miniplate on the outer cortex. The purpose of this study was to describe our management of mandibular angle fractures by two noncompression miniplates placed on the outer cortex via a transbuccal approach. Medical records and radiographic examination of 389 patients (258 males [66.3%] and 131 females [33.7%]) operated from January 2000 to December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative complications including malocclusion, infection, wound dehiscence, nonunion, and reoperative surgery were recorded and analyzed. Fifty-three patients developed postoperative complications (overall complication rate: 13.6%). No significant difference was found in the complication rate by age and gender variables and regarding the interval between the trauma and the operation and the presence of the teeth in the line of fracture. A higher rate of complications was found among patients with alcohol/drug addiction and in patients with multiple-site involvement. The findings of this study suggest that the use of two transbuccal miniplates placed on the outer cortex for the internal fixation of mandibular angle fracture provided a low rate of complications. The global incidence of screw loosening, wound dehiscence, plate exposure, infection, reoperation, and plate removal were similar with the data reported in the literature with improved health outcomes, lower postoperative morbidity, and a faster return to normal life.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Cocis ◽  
Umberto Autorino ◽  
Fabio Roccia ◽  
Chiara Corio

Bilateral mandibular angle fractures, while representing a rarity among mandibular fractures, are a huge challenge of complex management for the maxillofacial surgeon. There are still many open questions regarding the ideal management of such fractures, including the following: the removal of the third molar in the fracture line, the best surgical approach, and the fixation methods. In this report the authors present the case of 40-year-old man presenting with a bilateral mandibular angle fracture referred to the Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Turin. Open reduction and internal fixation has been made for both sides. The left side third molar was removed and the internal fixation was achieved through internal fixation with one miniplate according to Champy’s technique and transbuccal access for a 4-hole miniplate at the inferior border of the mandible. Right side third molar was not removed and fixation was achieved through intraoral access and positioning of a 4-hole miniplate along the external ridge according to Champy. An optimal reduction was achieved and a correct occlusion has been restored.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 526-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Wallner ◽  
Knut Reinbacher ◽  
Matthias Feichtinger ◽  
Mauro Pau ◽  
Georg Feigl ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy S. Xue ◽  
John C. Koshy ◽  
Erik M. Wolfswinkel ◽  
William M. Weathers ◽  
Kristina P. Marsack ◽  
...  

This prospective randomized clinical trial compared the treatment outcomes of strut plate and Champy miniplate in fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Patients with mandibular angle fracture were consented and enrolled into this study. Exclusion criteria include patients with severely comminuted fractures. The patients were randomly assigned to receive the strut plate or Champy miniplate for angle fracture fixation. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, operative and postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the significance of the outcome. A total of 18 patients were included in this study and randomly assigned to receive either the strut plate or Champy miniplate. Out of which five patients were excluded postoperatively due to complex fracture resulting in postoperative maxillomandibular fixation. The final enrollment was 13 patients, N = 6 (strut) and N = 7 (Champy). There was no statistically significant difference in the pretreatment variables. Nine of these patients had other associated facial fractures, including parasymphyseal and subcondylar fractures. Most of the (11) patients had sufficient follow-up after surgery. Both groups exhibited successful clinical unions of the mandibular angle fractures. The complications associated with the mandibular angle were 20% in the strut plate group and 16.7% in the Champy group. One patient in the strut plate group had a parasymphyseal infection, requiring hardware removal. The strut plate demonstrated comparable surgical outcome as the Champy miniplate. It is a safe and effective alternative for management of mandibular angle fracture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document