scholarly journals Redução aberta com fixação interna em fraturas de ângulo mandibular: revisão de literatura / Open reduction with internal fixation in mandibular angle fracture: literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 12166-12177
Author(s):  
Beatriz Nogueira Dos Santos ◽  
Lucas Leverson Lisboa Da Costa ◽  
Alice Christinne de Alencar Lemos ◽  
Amanda Marinho Chaves Costa ◽  
Letícia Sandes de Albuquerque Silva ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. 194338752090489
Author(s):  
Mrunalini Ramanathan ◽  
Elavenil Panneerselvam ◽  
Sriraam Kasi Ganesh ◽  
Krishna Kumar Raja

Mandibular angle fractures are frequently encountered as they constitute an area of weakness. Complications after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of angle fractures commonly arise due to improper reduction and fixation methods that fail to counteract the dynamic muscle forces present in this region. Conventional reduction methods such as digital manipulation, intermaxillary fixation, towel clip traction, and wiring are associated with various limitations. This technical note highlights the fabrication and use of a computer-aided designing/computer-aided manufacturing–generated splint for ORIF of a superiorly displaced mandibular angle fracture. The splint consisted of 2 components: (1) a distal tooth-borne component to guide the teeth into maximum intercuspation and (2) a proximal bone-borne component to reduce the angle fracture. This composite splint facilitates simultaneous restoration of occlusion as well as reduction of mandibular angle fractures. The advantages of this technique include the following: (1) easy fabrication of splint, (2) easy and precise anatomical reduction of angle fracture, and (3) less operative time.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-320
Author(s):  
F. P. S. Guastaldi ◽  
A. P. Martini ◽  
E. P. Rocha ◽  
E. Hochuli-Vieira ◽  
A. C. Guastaldi

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 22274-22282
Author(s):  
João Victor Pinheiro Costa ◽  
Carlos Henrique Alécio de Vasconcelos Filho ◽  
Ermeson Allison de Morais Malta ◽  
Carlos Henrique Querino ◽  
Enzo Lima Mella ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-112
Author(s):  
Uday Kumar Goswami ◽  
Md Rezaul Islam ◽  
Binay Kumar Das ◽  
Pradip Chandra Dash ◽  
Mohammad Hedayet Ali Khan ◽  
...  

Background: Surgical management of simple mandibular angle fracture is a very crucial process.Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the post-operative outcomes of intermaxillary fixation and open reduction with internal fixation of simple mandibular angle fracture.Methodology: This randomized control trial was conducted in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Dhaka Dental College & Hospital, Dhaka and Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh from January 2010 to December 2010 for a period of one (01) year. Among all patients admitted/attended to the hospital IPD with fracture of mandibular angle with or without other associated fracture sites were selected as study subjects. After recruitment of the patients, they were assigned either as group A or group B after randomization. In group A the patients of this group were treated by open reduction and internal miniplate fixation with additional placement of intermaxillary fixation; in group B the patients of this group were treated by open reduction and internal miniplate fixation without any additional placement of intermaxillary fixation. During follow up period stability of fracture segments, post reduction alignment and inter-incisal opening were recorded.Result: A total of 30 patients presented with mandibular angle fractures were included in the study. They were allocated in two groups named miniplate osteosynthesis with Inter-maxillary fixation group (n=16) and without inter-maxillary fixation group (n=14) randomly. Time required to accomplish the surgical procedures was significantly high (p=0.000) group A (99.38±15.26 minutes) than group B (55.38±6.34 minutes). Among them 01 patient developed instability after inter-maxillary fixation. And 01 patient developed such in other procedure; however this difference is not statistically significant (p=0.724). In post operative radiography the mean score of post reduction alignment was slightly higher in group A than group B which was 2.50±0.516 and 2.214±0.426 respectively (p=0.107). The inter-incisal opening in baseline was 14.69 and 18.14 in group A and group B respectively. However, in review 3 it was found 36.19 and 37.64 in group A and group B respectively (p=0.0001).Conclusion: In conclusion significantly less operative time was required to accomplish the operative procedure in without IMF group as well as there was also a significant difference of inter-incisal opening between two procedures in subsequent review findingsJournal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh, 2018;4(2): 108-112


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Spinelli ◽  
Davide Lazzeri ◽  
Francesco Arcuri ◽  
Domenico Valente ◽  
Tommaso Agostini

Fractures of the mandibular angle account for 23 to 42% of all facial fractures with a high complication rate (0–32%). Although the ideal treatment remains debatable, two main procedures are commonly used to manage the majority of mandibular angle fractures that are open reduction and internal fixation by a noncompression miniplate placed on the external oblique ridge with or without a second miniplate on the outer cortex. The purpose of this study was to describe our management of mandibular angle fractures by two noncompression miniplates placed on the outer cortex via a transbuccal approach. Medical records and radiographic examination of 389 patients (258 males [66.3%] and 131 females [33.7%]) operated from January 2000 to December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative complications including malocclusion, infection, wound dehiscence, nonunion, and reoperative surgery were recorded and analyzed. Fifty-three patients developed postoperative complications (overall complication rate: 13.6%). No significant difference was found in the complication rate by age and gender variables and regarding the interval between the trauma and the operation and the presence of the teeth in the line of fracture. A higher rate of complications was found among patients with alcohol/drug addiction and in patients with multiple-site involvement. The findings of this study suggest that the use of two transbuccal miniplates placed on the outer cortex for the internal fixation of mandibular angle fracture provided a low rate of complications. The global incidence of screw loosening, wound dehiscence, plate exposure, infection, reoperation, and plate removal were similar with the data reported in the literature with improved health outcomes, lower postoperative morbidity, and a faster return to normal life.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Cocis ◽  
Umberto Autorino ◽  
Fabio Roccia ◽  
Chiara Corio

Bilateral mandibular angle fractures, while representing a rarity among mandibular fractures, are a huge challenge of complex management for the maxillofacial surgeon. There are still many open questions regarding the ideal management of such fractures, including the following: the removal of the third molar in the fracture line, the best surgical approach, and the fixation methods. In this report the authors present the case of 40-year-old man presenting with a bilateral mandibular angle fracture referred to the Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Turin. Open reduction and internal fixation has been made for both sides. The left side third molar was removed and the internal fixation was achieved through internal fixation with one miniplate according to Champy’s technique and transbuccal access for a 4-hole miniplate at the inferior border of the mandible. Right side third molar was not removed and fixation was achieved through intraoral access and positioning of a 4-hole miniplate along the external ridge according to Champy. An optimal reduction was achieved and a correct occlusion has been restored.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 526-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Wallner ◽  
Knut Reinbacher ◽  
Matthias Feichtinger ◽  
Mauro Pau ◽  
Georg Feigl ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document