Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weier Wang ◽  
Xiaodong Sun ◽  
Fangqiang Wei
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision

The role of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 378-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamran Ahmed ◽  
Tim T. Wang ◽  
Vanash M. Patel ◽  
Kamal Nagpal ◽  
James Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Pelvic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

Robotic surgery vs laparoscopic surgery in patients with diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 687-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Restaino ◽  
Liliana Mereu ◽  
Angelo Finelli ◽  
Maria Roberta Spina ◽  
Giulia Marini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis

Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an updated systematic review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weier Wang ◽  
Yanhong Fei ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Tunan Yu ◽  
Jianming Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Laparoscopic Surgery Performed Through a Single Incision: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

2011 ◽  
Vol 212 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Pfluke ◽  
Michael Parker ◽  
John A. Stauffer ◽  
Alyssa A. Paetau ◽  
Steven P. Bowers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Current Literature ◽  
Single Incision

Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1478-1484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip H. Pucher ◽  
Mikael H. Sodergren ◽  
Pritam Singh ◽  
Ara Darzi ◽  
Paraskevas Parakseva
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
The Past

scholarly journals Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Liver Resections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 145749692092563 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Kamarajah ◽  
J. Bundred ◽  
D. Manas ◽  
L. R. Jiao ◽  
M. A. Hilal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Laparoscopic Liver Resection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Robotic Liver Resection ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic

Background: Theoretical advantages of robotic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery include improved instrument dexterity, 3D visualization, and better ergonomics. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine advantages of robotic surgery over laparoscopic surgery in patients undergoing liver resections. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies comparing robotic assisted or totally laparoscopic liver resection. Meta-analysis of intraoperative (operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, conversion rate), oncological (R0 resection rates), and postoperative (bile leak, surgical site infection, pulmonary complications, 30-day and 90-day mortality, length of stay, 90-day readmission and reoperation rates) outcomes was performed using a random effects model. Result: Twenty-six non-randomized studies including 2630 patients (950 robotic and 1680 laparoscopic) were included, of which 20% had major robotic liver resection and 14% had major laparoscopic liver resection. Intraoperatively, robotic liver resection was associated with significantly less blood loss (mean: 286 vs 301 mL, p < 0.001) but longer operating time (mean: 281 vs 221 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in conversion rates or transfusion rates between robotic liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in overall complications, bile leaks, and length of hospital stay between robotic liver resection and laparoscopic liver resection. However, robotic liver resection was associated with significantly lower readmission rates than laparoscopic liver resection (odds ratio: 0.43, p = 0.005). Conclusion: Robotic liver resection appears to offer some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both techniques appear equivalent. Importantly, the quality of evidence is generally limited to cohort studies and a high-quality randomized trial comparing both techniques is needed.

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1205-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. Markar ◽  
A. Karthikesalingam ◽  
S. Thrumurthy ◽  
L. Muirhead ◽  
J. Kinross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document