scholarly journals A safe and simple procedure for laparoscopic hepatectomy with combined diaphragmatic resection

Author(s):  
Keisuke Oyama ◽  
Shin Nakahira ◽  
Sakae Maeda ◽  
Akihiro Kitagawa ◽  
Yuki Ushimaru ◽  
...  

AbstractDiaphragmatic resection may be required beneath the diaphragm in some patients with liver tumors. Laparoscopic diaphragmatic resection is technically difficult to secure in the surgical field and in suturing. We report a case of successful laparoscopic hepatectomy with diaphragmatic resection. A 48-year-old man who underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver metastasis of rectal cancer 20 months ago underwent surgery because of a new hepatic lesion that invaded the diaphragm. The patient was placed in the left hemilateral decubitus position. The liver and diaphragm attachment areas were encircled using hanging tape. Liver resection preceded diaphragmatic resection with the hanging tape in place. Two snake retractors were used to secure the surgical field for the inflow of CO2 into the pleural space after diaphragmatic resection. The defective part of the diaphragm was repaired using continuous or interrupted sutures. Both ends of the suture were tied with an absorbable suture clip without ligation. In laparoscopic liver resection with diaphragmatic resection, the range of diaphragmatic resection can be minimized by performing liver resection using the hanging method before diaphragmatic resection. The surgical field can be secured using snake retractors. Suturing with an absorbable suture clip is conveniently feasible.

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 2044-2047 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Machado ◽  
F. F. Makdissi ◽  
R. C. Surjan ◽  
G. T. Kappaz ◽  
N. Yamaguchi

HPB ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S470-S471
Author(s):  
E. Willems ◽  
M. D'Hondt ◽  
I. Parmentier ◽  
H. Pottel ◽  
C. Verslype ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 392-401
Author(s):  
Priya Hazrah ◽  
Deborshi Sharma ◽  
Saurabh Borgharia ◽  
Pawan Kumar ◽  
Romesh Lal

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihai-Calin Pavel ◽  
Raquel Casanova ◽  
Laia Estalella ◽  
Robert Memba ◽  
Erik Llàcer-Millán ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Liver resection (LR) in patients with liver metastasis from colo-rectal cancer remains the only curative treatment. Perioperative chemotherapy improves prognosis of these patients. However, there are concerns regarding the effect of preoperative chemotherapy on liver regeneration, which is a key event in avoiding liver failure after LR. The primary objective of this systematic review is to assess the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on liver regeneration after (LR) or portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients with liver metastasis from colo-rectal cancer. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the impact of the type of chemotherapy, number of cycles and time between end of treatment and procedure (LR or PVE) and to investigate whether there is an association between degree of hypertrophy and postoperative liver failure.Methods: The design of this systematic review will follow the current recommendations of PRISMA. Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane databases will be searched We will include studies reporting liver regeneration rates in patients submitted to LR or PVE. Only studies comparing neoadjuvant vs no chemotherapy, or comparing chemotherapy characteristics (bevacizumab administration, number of cycles and time from finishing chemotherapy until intervention) will be included. We will select studies from 1990 to present. Two researchers will individually screen the identified records, according to a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcome will be future liver remnant regeneration rate. Bias of the studies will be evaluated with the ROBINS-I tool and quality of evidence for all outcomes will be determined with the GRADE system. The data will be registered in a predesigned database. If selected studies are sufficiently homogeneous, we will perform a meta-analysis of reported results. In the event of a substantial heterogeneity, a qualitive systematic review will be performed.Discussion: The results of this systematic review may help to better identify the patients affected by liver metastasis that could present low regeneration rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These patients are at risk to develop liver failure after extended hepatectomies and therefore are not good candidates for such aggressive procedures.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020178481 (July 5th 2020).


HPB ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e241-e242
Author(s):  
J. Buell ◽  
E. Wynter ◽  
C. Li ◽  
A. Miller ◽  
E. Kandil

2002 ◽  
Vol 236 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-François Gigot ◽  
David Glineur ◽  
Juan Santiago Azagra ◽  
Martine Goergen ◽  
Marc Ceuterick ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document