scholarly journals Individualizing the use of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in patients with complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: experiences from a tertiary care center

Infection ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eline J. van Leerdam ◽  
Michelle Gompelman ◽  
Renée A. M. Tuinte ◽  
Erik H. J. G. Aarntzen ◽  
Marvin A. H. Berrevoets ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose [18F]FDG-PET/CT scanning can help detect metastatic infectious foci and reduce mortality in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), but it is unknown if patients with SAB and an indication for prolonged treatment because of possible endovascular, orthopaedic implant, or other metastatic infection still need [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Methods In a retrospective single-center cohort study, we included all consecutive adult patients with SAB between 2013 and 2020 if an [18F]FDG-PET/CT scan was performed and antibiotic treatment was planned for ≥ 6 weeks prior to [18F]FDG-PET/CT. We aimed to identify patients for whom treatment was adjusted due to the results of [18F]FDG-PET/CT, and assessed concordance of [18F]FDG-PET/CT and clinical diagnosis for infected prosthetic material. Results Among 132 patients included, the original treatment plan was changed after [18F]FDG-PET/CT in 22 patients (16.7%), in the majority (n = 20) due to diagnosing or rejecting endovascular (graft) infection. Antibiotic treatment modifications were shortening in 2, iv-oral switch in 3, extension in 13, and addition of rifampicin in 4 patients. Ninety additional metastatic foci based on [18F]FDG-PET/CT results were found in 69/132 patients (52.3%). [18F]FDG-PET/CT suggested vascular graft infection in 7/14 patients who lacked clinical signs of infection, but showed no infection of prosthetic joints or osteosynthesis material in eight patients who lacked clinical signs of such an infection. Conclusion [18F]FDG-PET/CT can help refine treatment for SAB in patients with clinically suspected endovascular infection or vascular grafts, even if 6 weeks treatment is already indicated, but can be safely omitted in other patients who are clinically stable.

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 411-412
Author(s):  
Yacine El Yaagoubi ◽  
Caroline Prunier-Aesch ◽  
Alain Chetanneau ◽  
Laurent Philippe ◽  
François Bleuet ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 876-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Puges ◽  
Xavier Bérard ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Ruiz ◽  
Frederic Debordeaux ◽  
Arnaud Desclaux ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 220 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-72
Author(s):  
P.A. de la Riva-Pérez ◽  
F.J. García-Gómez ◽  
G. Sabatel-Hernández

Author(s):  
Juyi Lin ◽  
Yuhua Yang ◽  
Lisha Liu ◽  
Shengcai Huang

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. e28-e29
Author(s):  
Hannah Harris ◽  
Teresa Szyszko ◽  
Tara Barwick ◽  
Justinas Silickas ◽  
Oliver Lyons ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L.M. Bruggink ◽  
A.W.J.M. Glaudemans ◽  
B.R. Saleem ◽  
R. Meerwaldt ◽  
H. Alkefaji ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 769-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabien Dutasta ◽  
Clémence Richaud ◽  
Adrien Michon ◽  
Emma Ragone ◽  
Isabelle Podglajen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 488-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacopo Colombo ◽  
Luigia Elzi ◽  
Giorgio Treglia ◽  
Andreas Perren

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document