Health Resource Utilization in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy in China

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Shi ◽  
Jun Zhu
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S34
Author(s):  
H. Loponen ◽  
V. Vihervaara ◽  
S. Ylä-Viteli ◽  
S. Torvinen ◽  
K. Tamminen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 216-216
Author(s):  
Erin Aakhus ◽  
Abigail T. Berman ◽  
Neil Crimins ◽  
Peter Edward Gabriel ◽  
Jennifer Braun ◽  
...  

216 Background: Cost of care of cancer patients near the end of life is a focus for payers and others. The breakdown of costs during this period for patients with Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are shifting as therapeutic choices change. We measured and reported variation in utilization, by oncologist, aiming to improve standardization and reduce utilization while maintaining or increasing the quality of care. Methods: Within the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS), we identified all deceased patients with Stage IV NSCLC with first contact of 1/3/2011 to date of death of 4/10/2016, at least 1 chemotherapy visit, and 6 months between first contact and death (N=175). We captured all inpatient and outpatient charges within 6 months of patient death. Results: The median gross total charge per patient was $209,637 (interquartile range, $121,517-$371,196), which consisted of 39% outpatient infusions, 23% radiation therapy, 18% inpatient medical admissions, 11% outpatient radiology, 4.5% professional charges, and <1% ED visits. Infusions of pemetrexed and bevacizumab accounted for 7.3% and 6.1% of the gross total charges, respectively. Only 13/175 (7.4%) of patients received infusions within 14 days of death. Primary oncologist was not found to be a significant driver of variation in total, outpatient, or inpatient gross charges per patient (p=0.097, 0.208, 0.297). However, we showed that professional charges and use of outpatient radiology differed by oncologist (p=0.039, 0.003). We also identified oncologist-driven differences in use of supportive care drugs pegfilgrastim, darbepoietin, and denosumab (p=0.002, <0.001, <0.001). We detected no differences in use of pemetrexed or bevacizumab (p=0.835, 0.521). The differences in number of infusion visits approached significance (p=0.058). Conclusions: Outpatient infusions and radiation therapy were the largest contributors to healthcare resource utilization in the care of Stage IV NSCLC patients in the last 6 months of life. Variation in utilization by primary oncologist was detected in professional charges, outpatient radiology, and the use of supportive care (but not chemotherapeutic) agents.


2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (13) ◽  
pp. 3210-3218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Kelly ◽  
John Crowley ◽  
Paul A. Bunn ◽  
Cary A. Presant ◽  
Patra K. Grevstad ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: This randomized trial was designed to determine whether paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) offered a survival advantage over vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VC) for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. Secondary objectives were to compare toxicity, tolerability, quality of life (QOL), and resource utilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred two patients received VC (vinorelbine 25 mg/m2/wk and cisplatin 100 mg/m2/d, day 1 every 28 days) and 206 patients received PC (paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 over 3 hours with carboplatin area under the curve of 6, day 1 every 21 days). Patients completed QOL questionnaires at baseline, 13 weeks, and 25 weeks. Resource utilization forms were completed at five time points through 24 months. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar between the groups. The objective response rate was 28% in the VC arm and 25% in the PC arm. Median survival was 8 months in both arms, with 1-year survival rates of 36% and 38%, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia (P = .002) and neutropenia (P = .008) occurred more frequently on the VC arm. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting were higher on the VC arm (P = .001, P = .007), and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was higher on the PC arm (P < .001). More patients on the VC arm discontinued therapy because of toxicity (P = .001). No difference in QOL was observed. Overall costs on the PC arm were higher than on the VC arm because of drug costs. CONCLUSION: PC is equally efficacious as VC for the treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. PC is less toxic and better tolerated but more expensive than VC. New treatment strategies should be pursued.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. e612-e620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Negar Chooback ◽  
Shilo Lefresne ◽  
Sally C. Lau ◽  
Cheryl Ho

Purpose: Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation–positive (EGFRm) non–small-cell lung cancer commonly experience disease progression in the CNS. Here, we assess the impact of CNS disease on resource utilization and outcomes in patients who are EGFRm. Methods: We completed a retrospective review of all advanced patients who were EGFRm, referred to BC Cancer, and treated with a first- and/or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor from 2010 to 2015. Baseline characteristics, systemic treatment, and CNS management were collected. We compared health resource utilization (HRU) between patients with CNS-negative disease and those with CNS metastases from the median time of CNS metastases diagnosis to death or last follow-up (9.1 months) and at 9 months preceding death or last follow-up for the CNS-negative group. Results: Four hundred ninety-nine patients were referred, of which 68% were female; 51% were of Asian ethnicity; and 57%, 37%, and 6% were exon 19, 21, or other, respectively; with a median age of 66 years. Two hundred twenty-nine (46%) of 499 patients developed CNS metastases—39% at diagnosis and 61% over the course of disease. CNS metastases were managed with surgery with or without whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT; 13%) WBRT alone (73%), stereotactic radiosurgery with or without WBRT (5%), or no CNS-directed therapy (9%). The median time from the development of CNS metastases diagnosis to death was 9.1 months. CNS-negative patients used less HRU versus patients that were CNS-positive in the 9 months preceding death or last follow-up—in the average number of clinic visits (8.53 v 12.71, respectively; P < .001), hospitalizations (0.43 v 0.76, respectively; P < .001), CNS imaging investigations (0.52 v 2.65, respectively; P < .001), emergency room visits (0.03 v 0.14, respectively; P = .001), palliative care unit admission (8% v 10%, respectively; P = .64), and hospice admission (3% v 19%, respectively; P < .001). Conclusion: The incidence of CNS metastases in patients with EGFRm is high and associated with increased HRU. Prevention or delay of CNS metastases with newer systemic therapy options may translate into lower resource utilization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document