In vitro comparison of microleakge between preformed metal crowns and aesthetic crowns of primary molars using different adhesive luting cements

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 387-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. N. Al-Haj Ali ◽  
R. I. Farah
Keyword(s):  
Primary Molars ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Preformed Metal Crowns ◽  
Adhesive Luting ◽  
In Vitro Comparison

An in vitro comparison of three delivery techniques for obturation of root canals in primary molars

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Walia ◽  
A. H. Ghanbari ◽  
S. Mathew ◽  
A. H. Ziadlou
Keyword(s):  
Primary Molars ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
In Vitro Comparison ◽  
Delivery Techniques

An in vitro Comparison of Detection Methods for Approximal Carious Lesions in Primary Molars

2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Chawla ◽  
L.B. Messer ◽  
G.G. Adams ◽  
D.J. Manton
Keyword(s):  
Detection Methods ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Carious Lesions ◽  
In Vitro Comparison

In vitro comparison of laser fluorescence performance with visual examination for detection of occlusal caries in permanent and primary molars

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas A. Rodrigues ◽  
Michele B. Diniz ◽  
Érika B. Josgrilberg ◽  
Rita C. L. Cordeiro
Keyword(s):  
Laser Fluorescence ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Visual Examination ◽  
Occlusal Caries ◽  
In Vitro Comparison

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Three Adhesive Luting Cements at Different Time Intervals under Oral Simulated Conditions: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumedha Dewan ◽  
Tarun Kalra ◽  
Manjit Kumar ◽  
Ajay Bansal ◽  
Abhishek Avasthi
Keyword(s):  
Flexural Strength ◽  
Modulus Of Elasticity ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Adhesive Luting

Abstract Aim The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of three adhesive luting cements as a function of specimen age, effect of storage media, and effect of curing through porcelain. Materials and Method Twenty samples fabricated for self-cure resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC; RelyX Luting 2, 3M ESPE, United States) were classified as group 1, whereas 40 samples fabricated for two dual-cure resin cements (20 samples each), Universal Resin Cement (Ammdent, Italy) and Maxcem Elite (Kerr Australia Pty. Ltd.), were classified as groups 2 and 3, respectively. The dual-cure cements were photo-activated using light cure unit with an intensity of 550 mW/cm2 in nine overlapping sections for 20 seconds per section on both sides. A total of 60 samples (20 samples in each group) were fabricated and tested using universal testing machine to compare flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC with two dual-cure adhesive resin cements, to determine the influence of storage of the specimens in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 hours and to determine the influence of curing through porcelain disk of 2 mm thickness on these properties. Results The overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of resin-modified GIC was less than the dual-cure resin cements. The values reduced for resin-modified GIC when the samples were tested after 24 hours of storage in saliva, whereas an increase in the strength was seen for dual-cure cements. The curing through porcelain disk reduced the properties of dual-cure cements. Maxcem Elite showed better overall mean flexural strength and modulus of elasticity in all the parameters. Conclusion When comparing all three cements, both dual-cure cements showed better flexural strength and modulus of elasticity compared to resin-modified GIC, which indicates their use in cementation of fixed restorations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document