Development of a German version of the Oral Health Assessment Tool

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna-Luisa Klotz ◽  
Melania Zajac ◽  
Judith Ehret ◽  
Alexander Jochen Hassel ◽  
Peter Rammelsberg ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Emily Yanca ◽  
Margherita Fontana ◽  
John R. Girdwood ◽  
Luke Aiura ◽  
Alison Dickson ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
JM Chalmers ◽  
PL King ◽  
AJ Spencer ◽  
FAC Wright ◽  
KD Carter

Author(s):  
Emily Yanca ◽  
Margherita Fontana ◽  
John R. Girdwood ◽  
Luke Aiura ◽  
Alison Dickson ◽  
...  

BMC Nursing ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Finotto ◽  
Giorgia Bertolini ◽  
Riccarda Camellini ◽  
Rita Fantelli ◽  
Debora Formisano ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bach Van Ho ◽  
Liza J. M. Rijt ◽  
Roxane A. F. Weijenberg ◽  
Claar D. Maarel‐Wierink ◽  
Frank Lobbezoo

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting-Ying Wu ◽  
Hsiu-Yueh Liu ◽  
Chien-Yi Wu ◽  
Hung-Cheng Chen ◽  
Shun-Te Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In end-of-life patients with advanced cancers, oral examination, oral care, and oral re-examination are crucial. Although oral symptoms are among the major complaints of end-of-life patients, few studies have focused on oral care in these patients. In this study, the association between oral symptoms and oral dryness among end-of-life patients was examined, and improvement of oral conditions after oral care interventions by a professional dentist was quantified. Methods: This prospective intervention study included 27 terminally ill patients with advanced cancers in a hospice ward. Professional oral care was administered every morning, and the improvement of oral conditions was assessed by comparing oral conditions before and after the intervention. Oral assessment was performed using the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) and Oral Assessment Guide. Oral dryness was evaluated through Clinical Diagnosis Classification of oral dryness and an oral moisture device. Oral cleanliness was evaluated using a bacterial counter, and tongue smears were collected for Candida examination; furthermore, oral function was recorded. Results: The presence of oral mucositis was closely associated with severe oral dryness (odds ratio [OR] = 14.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95–114.38). The level of oral debris retention was significantly related to the degree of oral dryness (OR = 15.97; 95% CI: 2.06–123.72). The group with higher scores (OHAT > 8), which represent poor oral conditions, showed severe oral dryness (OR = 17.97; 95% CI: 1.45–223.46). Total OHAT scores (median: 7 vs 2) and those of other subgroups (lip, tongue, gums and tissues, saliva, and oral cleanliness showed a significant decrease after the intervention. Furthermore, the occurrence of mucositis (47.1% vs 0%), candidiasis rate (68.8% vs 43.8%), oral dryness self-sensation (63.6% vs 9.1%), and severe oral debris (52.9% vs 11.8%) decreased significantly. Conclusions: Proper oral care can improve oral health and hygiene, reduce the rate of mucositis, reduce the sensation of oral dryness, increase oral moisture, and reduce the chances of oral infections among end-of-life patients. Daily oral care is necessary and can alleviate oral discomfort, increase food intake, and increase the chances of communication between end-of-life patients and their families.


2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-82
Author(s):  
Enri Nakayama ◽  
Haruka Tohara ◽  
Mitsuyasu Sato ◽  
Kimiko Abe ◽  
Masanori Kimura ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingeborg S. Simpelaere ◽  
Gwen Van Nuffelen ◽  
Jan Vanderwegen ◽  
Kristien Wouters ◽  
Marc De Bodt

Author(s):  
Jonas Czwikla ◽  
Alexandra Herzberg ◽  
Sonja Kapp ◽  
Stephan Kloep ◽  
Heinz Rothgang ◽  
...  

We quantified the effectiveness of an oral health intervention among home care recipients. Seven German insurance funds invited home care recipients to participate in a two-arm randomized controlled trial. At t0, the treatment group (TG) received an intervention comprising an oral health assessment, dental treatment recommendations and oral health education. The control group (CG) received usual care. At t1, blinded observers assessed objective (Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT)) and subjective (Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)) oral health and the objective periodontal situation (Periodontal Screening Index (PSI)). Of 9656 invited individuals, 527 (5.5%) participated. In the TG, 164 of 259 (63.3%) participants received the intervention and 112 (43.2%) received an outcome assessment. In the CG, 137 of 268 (51.1%) participants received an outcome assessment. The OHAT mean score (2.83 vs. 3.31, p = 0.0665) and the OHIP mean score (8.92 vs. 7.99, p = 0.1884) did not differ significantly. The prevalence of any periodontal problems (77.1% vs. 92.0%, p = 0.0027) was significantly lower in the TG than in the CG, but the prevalence of periodontitis was not (35.4% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.1764). Future studies should investigate whether other recruitment strategies and a more comprehensive intervention might be more successful in improving oral health among home care recipients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document