Can the Severity of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy be Predicted by Second Trimester Screening Test Parameters?

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-198
Author(s):  
Samettin Celik ◽  
Banuhan Sahin ◽  
Canan Soyer-Calıskan ◽  
Handan Celik ◽  
Safak Hatirnaz
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 692-697
Author(s):  
Cuma Taşın ◽  
Nezaket Kadıoğlu ◽  
Revan Sabri Çiftçi ◽  
Hatun Çolak ◽  
Hakan Aytan

Objective: To assess the role of first and second-trimester screening biomarkers pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A(PAPP-A), free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin(free ß-hCG), estriol, alpha-fetoprotein and total β-hCG in the early diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). Materials and Methods: Patients with ICP admitted to Mersin University Hospital for delivery between 2015 and 2019 and had first and second-trimester aneuploidy screening tests performed in the same facility were retrospectively assessed. Randomly 60 pregnant women without comorbid conditions during the same period were included as controls. Data regarding demographic characteristics, laboratory values including free ß-hCG and PAPP-A in first-trimester screening and total ß-hCG, estriol and alpha- fetoprotein in second-trimester screening were compared. Results: There were 46 eligible patients with ICP. In first trimester screening, it was found that PAPP-A MoM was significantly lower (0.89±0.55 vs. 1.94±0.73; p=0.035) while free ß-hCG MoM was significantly higher in ICP group when compared to controls (1.84±0.59 vs. 0.99±0.47; p=0.018). In second trimester screening, no significant difference was detected in aneuploidy markers between groups. For prediction of ICP development, first trimester free β-hCG >1.44 MoM was found to have a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 80% and positive and negative predictive values of 33% and 88.9% respectively. Similarly first trimester PAPP-A values <1.075 MoM was found to have 80% and 75% sensitivity and specificity with positive and negative predictive values of 75% and 44% respectively. Conclusion: Low PAPP-A MoM value and elevated free ß-hCG in first trimester seem to be associated with ICP development.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umit Gorkem ◽  
Ayse Semra Gureser ◽  
Cihan Togrul ◽  
Djursun Karasartova ◽  
Tayfun Gungor ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> With apoptosis being critical for the development and homeostasis of placental tissues, it is possible to hypothesize that accelerated trophoblastic apoptosis during pregnancy may result in a partial loss of trophoblastic activity or trophoblastic cell mass, and ultimately may alter the second-trimester screening test parameters. Thus, this study was conducted to investigate the influence of maternal toxoplasmosis on second-trimester aneuploidy screening tests.<br /><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> This retrospective study was conducted with 552 pregnant women admitted to our University Hospital. The demographic data such as maternal age and weight; and the main parameters of second-trimester aneuploidy screening test including maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, unconjugated estriol (uE3) and human chorionic gonadotropin were analyzed with the comparison of their Toxoplasma immunoglobulin serology results.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> The mean age of the pregnant women was 27.6 (17.0 - 43.0) years, and the mean maternal weight was estimated at 65.0 (40.0 - 120.0) kg. The pregnant women with positive Toxoplasma IgG antibody had a higher mean maternal age than those with negative Toxoplasma IgG antibody (p&lt; 0.0001). No significant difference for the concentrations and MoM values of second-trimester screening test parameters in women with Toxoplasma IgM and IgG antibodies was observed (p&gt; 0.05, for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Although IgG-seropositivity of toxoplasmosis may lead to an accelerated trophoblastic apoptosis during pregnancy, there is no significant influence on the second-trimester screening test results. There was no data regarding the unaffected population whom used for calculation of MoM, if they</p>


2013 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Vanya Nikolova ◽  
Shadi Abu Hayyeh ◽  
Georgia Papacleovoulou ◽  
Malcolm Parker ◽  
Catherine Williamson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document