Bilateral Fetal Hydronephrosis presenting with Complete Penoscrotal Transposition at Birth: What to tell the Prospective Parents?

Author(s):  
Payal Patwa ◽  
Charu Sharma ◽  
Shashank Shekhar ◽  
Manisha Jhirwal
Diagnosis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elham Kebriyaei ◽  
Ali Davoodi ◽  
Seyed Alinaghi Kazemi ◽  
Zahra Bazargani

Abstract Objectives Renal anomalies are the most common fetal abnormalities that occur during prenatal development, and are typically detected by observing hydronephrosis on fetal ultrasound imaging. Follow-up with post-natal ultrasound is important to detect clinically-important obstruction, because many of the pre-natal abnormalities resolve spontaneously. This study aimed to evaluate the postnatal hydronephrosis follow-up rate, and reasons for non follow-up in affected neonates. Methods In this cross-sectional study all neonates born during a period of one year at Ayatollah Mousavi Hospital with hydronephrosis on fetal ultrasound imaging were recruited. All mothers were also given face-to-face information about fetal hydronephrosis and its postnatal outcomes, and follow-up with at least a postnatal ultrasound was recommended from the fourth day of their neonates’ birth until the end of the fourth week. The neonates were subsequently observed for one month to determine the postnatal ultrasound follow-up rate and to reflect on diagnostic test results, reasons for failure to follow-up, as well as causes of hydronephrosis. Results In this study, 71 cases (1.2%) out of 5,952 neonates had fetal hydronephrosis on prenatal ultrasound images. The postnatal ultrasound imaging showed kidney involvement in 18 neonates (25%), particularly in the left kidney (61.1%). Seven neonates had no follow-up at one month (10%). No significant relationship was found between lack of follow-up and the neonates’ place of residence (p=0.42), maternal education (p=0.90), number of siblings (p=0.33), or gender (p=0.64). Conclusions Postnatal ultrasound follow-up rate in these neonates with a history of fetal hydronephrosis was incomplete even though parents had been provided with education and advice at their birth time. Accordingly, it is recommended to perform postnatal ultrasound once neonates are discharged from hospitals.


Author(s):  
Thirsa Conijn ◽  
Ivy van Dijke ◽  
Lotte Haverman ◽  
Phillis Lakeman ◽  
Frits A Wijburg ◽  
...  

AbstractPreconception expanded carrier screening (ECS) enables prospective parents to assess their risk of having a child with an autosomal recessive disorder. Knowledge on motivations, feelings, and considerations people have towards the offer and use of ECS is limited. To enrich the public and professional discussion on ECS implementation, this study explored the perspectives towards various aspects of ECS in seven focus groups compromising first- and second-degree relatives of MPS III patients (N=9, N=4, N=5, N=5) and members of the general Dutch population (N=6, N=7, N=5). The focus groups were audio recorded and the transcripts were qualitatively analyzed to identify themes. Both relatives of MPS III patients and participants from the general population supported offering ECS, in particular for severe, childhood-onset disorders. Important barriers identified for ECS were a lack of genetic knowledge and a perceived lack of personal relevance and awareness, as well as out-of-pocket costs of testing. The majority of participants would prefer full disclosure of individual test results instead of couple-based test results. Moreover, offering people a choice for the way of reporting was proposed. All participants agreed that more efforts, for example by governmental campaigns, should be made to increase awareness on the availability, potentials, and limitations of ECS. Educating prospective parents about ECS is essential for increasing awareness and informed decision making. This study provides valuable insights that can be used by governments and public health authorities when considering implementation of preconception ECS.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. e99-e106 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. C. Plass ◽  
C. G. van El ◽  
T. Pieters ◽  
M. C. Cornel

Ethics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 529-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Wasserman
Keyword(s):  
De Dicto ◽  

2001 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Lim Chung ◽  
Jong Rak Choi ◽  
Min Soo Park ◽  
Seung Hun Choi

1989 ◽  
Vol 142 (2 Part 2) ◽  
pp. 661-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen W. Dejter ◽  
M. David Gibbons
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Sandeep Hambarde ◽  
Pradnya Bendre

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document