Who We Are Today: a National Survey of Diversity Among Psychiatry Program Directors

Author(s):  
Paul C. Lee ◽  
José M. Flores ◽  
Adrienne Adams ◽  
Myo Thwin Myint ◽  
Auralyd Padilla Candelario ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa R. Arbuckle ◽  
David A. Stern ◽  
Andres Barkil-Oteo ◽  
Ali Abbas Asghar-Ali

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 102285
Author(s):  
Maxwell F. Kilcoyne ◽  
Garrett N. Coyan ◽  
Edgar Aranda-Michel ◽  
Arman Kilic ◽  
Victor O. Morell ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 563-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caleb R. Schultz ◽  
Jeffrey J. Benson ◽  
David A. Cook ◽  
David O. Warner

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel S. Casas ◽  
Laura D. Hallett ◽  
Catherine A. Rich ◽  
Megan R. Gerber ◽  
Tracy A. Battaglia

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (S3) ◽  
pp. 1181-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Larrieux ◽  
Blake I. Wachi ◽  
John T. Miura ◽  
Kiran K. Turaga ◽  
Kathleen K. Christians ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-162
Author(s):  
Randy Sorge ◽  
Simiao Li-Sauerwine ◽  
Jorge Fernandez ◽  
Gene Hern

Introduction: It is unclear how emergency medicine (EM) programs educate core faculty about the use of milestones in competency-based evaluations. We conducted a national survey to profile how programs educate core faculty regarding their use and to assess core faculty’s understanding of the milestones. Methods: Our survey tool was distributed over six months in 2017 via the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) listserv. Responses, which were de-identified, were solicited from program directors (PDs), assistant/associate program directors (APDs), and core faculty. A single response from a program was considered sufficient. Results: Our survey had a 69.7% response rate (n=140/201). 62.9% of programs reported educating core faculty about the EM Milestones via the distribution of physical or electronic media. Although 82.6% of respondents indicated that it was important for core faculty to understand how the EM Milestones are used in competency-based evaluations, respondents estimated that 48.6% of core faculty possess “fair or poor” understanding of the milestones. Furthermore, only 50.7% of respondents felt that the EM Milestones were a valuable tool. Conclusion: These data suggest there is sub-optimal understanding of the EM Milestones among core faculty and disagreement as to whether the milestones are a valuable tool.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document