Characterizing Learners’ Growth of Geometric Understanding in Dynamic Geometry Environments: a Perspective of the Pirie–Kieren Theory

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangquan Yao
2013 ◽  
pp. 199-214
Author(s):  
Maha Abboud-Blanchard ◽  
Monique Chappet Paries

1994 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. 716-717
Author(s):  
Celia Hoyles ◽  
Richard Noss

The September and October columns of this department described features of dynamic geometry environments. This month's column is concerned with the distinction between drawingand constructing in these environments, a theme that will be continued in later issues. Hoyles and Noss have devised a simple way, “messing up,” to make this distinction clearer for students.


2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-94
Author(s):  
S. Asli Özgün-Koca ◽  
Matt Enlow

In this month's Growing Problem Solvers, we focused on supporting students' understanding of congruence and similarity through rigid motions and transformations. Initial understandings of congruence and similarity begin in first grade as students work with shapes in different perspectives and orientations and reflect on similarities and differences.


2015 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Michael Todd Edwards ◽  
James Quinlan

Current standards place significant emphasis on transformations in school geometry: “Fundamental are the rigid motions: translations, rotations, reflections, and combinations of these,” and “dynamic geometry environments provide students with experimental and modeling tools that allow them to investigate geometric phenomena” (CCSSI, 2010, p. 74). With these aims in mind, we share a favorite classroom activity—virtual miniature golf. Building on the work of Coxford and Usiskin (1991) and Powell et al. (1994), this activity provides geometry students with a real-world context for exploring reflection and reflection composition in technology-rich settings.


Pythagoras ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 0 (60) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vimolan Mudaly

In this paper I claim that modelling should be seen as the first stage of the proving process. I discuss an experiment conducted with grade 10 (15 year old) learners in a small suburb in South Africa. There is little emphasis placed on modelling in our schools and it is just beginning to make an appearance in our new Outcomes Based Curriculum. The research shows that as a result of the modelling process learners felt the need to know why the result was true. There is ample evidence that a lot of work on a similar topic has been done elsewhere in the world, but not much has been done in South Africa. The research was conducted using Sketchpad as a mediating tool. This in itself was a difficult task because our learners have not really been exposed to dynamic geometry environments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document