scholarly journals The Scope for and the Significance and Desirability of the Use of the Term ‘Genocide’ by Politicians: Joint Advisory Report by the Netherlands Advisory Committee on Issues of Public International Law and the External Advisor on Public International Law (March 2017)

2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-101
Author(s):  
Menno T. Kamminga
2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
JANNE E. NIJMAN

Professor Emeritus of Public International Law Pieter Hendrik (Peter) Kooijmans passed away on 13 February 2013. He leaves a lasting void within the international-law community both inside and outside the Netherlands.


1997 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Brus

When Peter Kooijmans took up his position as judge in the International Court of Justice on 6 February 1997, a formal end came to a career of about 30 years of teaching public international law in the Netherlands. This is why the Leiden Journal of International Law has asked me to write a few words about the work and person of Peter Kooijmans as a teacher of public international law, a task which I accepted with great pleasure, also on behalf of other staff members who have worked with Peter Kooijmans for many years.


1987 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 236-236

The Department of State has revived its former practice of constituting an Advisory Committee on International Law. Appointed by the Legal Adviser, Abraham D. Sofaer, the committee is intended to provide the Department with a means of obtaining the advice and views of the United States legal profession on questions of public international law.


Author(s):  
Henri de Waele

Abstract Despite the historical turn in the study of public international law and the advance of comparative approaches, still too little attention is paid nowadays to specific national traditions. This holds, inter alia, for the scholarly views and practices in the Netherlands during the first half of the 20th century. This article seeks to shed light on the experiences here at the advent of the League of Nations and its tentative ‘new world order’. Offering a meso-level analysis, it portrays the leading protagonists during the 1920s and 1930s, aiming to provide a snapshot of how their discipline and activities underwent an unexpectedly swift professionalization. This process is perceived to have run along three distinct vectors – academic, societal and diplomatic/bureaucratic – which are each examined in turn. Novel opportunities stemming from the rise of the international judiciary, especially the two Permanent Courts established on Dutch soil, are looked at separately. The research delivers a greater insight into the inter-war era and the challenges faced by (academics from) smaller nations, enabling us to situate underexplored local experiences within a global frame, and offering useful lessons for (the writing of) international law history more generally.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document