Predicting War Outcomes Based on a Fuzzy Influence Diagram

Author(s):  
Jingyang Xia ◽  
Zhenyang Pi ◽  
Weiguo Fang
2018 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 01003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelaziz Lakehal ◽  
Fouad Tachi

The Intermodal transport represents a solution, which has proved its effectiveness, for the supply of the various logistic platforms. Road transport is also one of the means of transport used in the logistic function and is the most common. This type of transport is especially recommended for medium and short distance journeys. Transport is an important link in the logistical chain. Several constraints accompany this transport function such as: delays, flexibility, diversity of merchandise, and road risks. To identify this last problem of road risk and to minimize its influence, a Bayesian network has been developed in this paper. Through experts’ surveys and research in the literature, the various risks were identified. The structure of the Bayesian network is defined on the basis of this census. The network settings vary from one situation to another. The exploitation of statistics and historical files of the transport company has allowed to define the parameters (probabilities) given in the example studied in this paper. To prevent risks and anticipate failures in the logistics function, while optimizing a utility function, an influence diagram was used. This tool has provided the ability to control actions and make decisions safely. An example of merchandise transport between two port companies has shown promising results and better efficiency in the anticipation of actions.


2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 82-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flora Chia-I Chang ◽  
Lun-Ping Hung ◽  
Huan-Chao Keh ◽  
Wen-Chih Chang ◽  
Timothy K. Shih

2007 ◽  
pp. 599-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Lagerström ◽  
P. Johnson ◽  
P. Närman
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Page Fortna

AbstractHow effective is terrorism? This question has generated lively scholarly debate and is of obvious importance to policy-makers. However, most existing studies of terrorism are not well equipped to answer this question because they lack an appropriate comparison. This article compares the outcomes of civil wars to assess whether rebel groups that use terrorism fare better than those who eschew this tactic. I evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of terrorism relative to other tactics used in civil war. Because terrorism is not a tactic employed at random, I first briefly explore empirically which groups use terrorism. Controlling for factors that may affect both the use of terrorism and war outcomes, I find that although civil wars involving terrorism last longer than other wars, terrorist rebel groups are generally less likely to achieve their larger political objectives than are nonterrorist groups. Terrorism may be less ineffective against democracies, but even in this context, terrorists do not win.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document