Assessment of Usefulness of CT Scan in AO Classification of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective Observational Study

Author(s):  
Rahul Yogendra Raj ◽  
Amit Srivastava ◽  
Aditya Nath Aggarwal ◽  
Rehan Ul Haq
2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 220.e1-220.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariona Badia ◽  
Luis Serviá ◽  
Josep Manel Casanova ◽  
Neus Montserrat ◽  
Judit Vilanova ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Gianella ◽  
Elia Rigamonti ◽  
Marco Marando ◽  
Adriana Tamburello ◽  
Lorenzo Grazioli Gauthier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background All over the world, SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is causing a significant short-term morbidity and mortality, but the medium-term impact on lung function and quality of life of affected patients are still unknown. Methods In this prospective observational study, 39 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were recruited from a single COVID-19 hospital in Southern Switzerland. At three months patients underwent radiological and functional follow-up through CT scan, lung function tests, and 6 min walking test. Furthermore, quality of life was assessed through self-reported questionnaires. Results Among 39 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, 32 (82% of all participants) presented abnormalities in CT scan and 25 (64.1%) had lung function tests impairment at three months. Moreover, 31 patients (79.5%) reported a perception of poor health due to respiratory symptoms and all 39 patients showed an overall decreased quality of life. Conclusions Medium-term follow up at three months of patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia shows the persistence of abnormalities in CT scans, a significant functional impairment assessed by lung function tests and a decreased quality of life in affected patients. Further studies evaluating the long-term impact are warranted to guarantee an appropriate follow-up to patients recovering from SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja M. Hjelle ◽  
Jan-Erik Gjertsen ◽  
Ellen M. Apalset ◽  
Roy M. Nilsen ◽  
Anja Lober ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It is mechanically plausible that osteoporosis leads to more severe peripheral fractures, but studies investigating associations between BMD and radiographically verified complexity of distal radius fractures are scarce. This study aims to study the association between osteoporosis, as well as other risk factors for fracture, and the AO classification of distal radius fractures. Methods In this observational study, 289 consecutive patients aged ≥40 years with a distal radius fracture were included. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the hips and spine was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and comorbidities, medication, physical activity, smoking habits, body mass index (BMI), and history of previous fracture were registered. The distal radius fractures were classified according to the Müller AO system (AO) (type B and C regarded as most complex). Results Patients with osteoporosis (n = 130) did not have increased odds of a more complex distal radius fracture (type B + C, n = 192)) (n = vs type A (n = 92) (OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.5 to 2.3]) compared to those with osteopenia /normal BMD (n = 159). Patients with AO fracture types A or C had a higher prevalence of osteoporosis than patients with type B fracture. Conclusions Distal radius fracture patients with osteoporosis did not sustain more complex fractures than those with osteopenia/normal BMD according to the AO classification system. The AO classification of distal radius fracture cannot be used to decide which patients should be referred to DXA scan and considered for secondary fracture prevention.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 1385-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Augustin ◽  
Elise Guivarch ◽  
Alexy Tran-Dinh ◽  
Quentin Pellenc ◽  
Sebastien Tanaka ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Zarie ◽  
Mohamed Farah Mohamoud ◽  
Amir Reza Farhoud ◽  
Nima Bagheri ◽  
Furqan Mohammed Yaseen Khan ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND:ArbeitsgemeinschaftfürOsteosynthesefragen (AO) classification is the most frequently used tool to classify intertrochanteric fractures. However, there is limited evidence regarding its reliability. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of the AO-2018 intertrochanteric fracture classification.METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted in Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, on radiography of patients who came with intertrochanteric fractures from March 21, 2018, to March 19, 2019. Four orthopedic trauma surgeons assessed 96 anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of intertrochanteric fractures and classified using an AO intertrochanteric fracture classification of 2018. The reading and review of radiography were performed in 2 separate occasions in a 1-month interval. The inter-observer and intra-observer reliability was assessed using kappa statistics.RESULT: The level of both mean inter-observer (K =0.322; 95%CI: 0.321-0.323) and intra-observer agreement (K =0.317; 95%CI: 0.314-0.320) in AO intertrochanteric fracture classification subgrouping were not satisfactory. The inter-observer (K =0.61; 95%CI: 0.608-0.611) and intra-observers’ (K=0.560;95%CI: 0.544-0.566) reliability in AO main groupings showed moderate agreement.CONCLUSION: The AO classification does not show adequate and acceptable inter-observer and intra-observer reliability and reproducibility. Therefore, it will be hard to base on the AO classification for treatment protocols.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document