Systemic lupus erythematosus: analysis of disease activity in 55 patients with end-stage renal failure treated with hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

1990 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans C. Nossent ◽  
Tom J.G. Swaak ◽  
Jo H.M. Berden
Nephrology ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 527-533
Author(s):  
Atsuhisa SATO ◽  
Hiromichi SUZUKI ◽  
Marohito MURAKAMI ◽  
Yoshihiko KANNO ◽  
Mareo NAITOH ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 240-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ram Gokal ◽  
Frank P. Marsh

Forty -one adult renal units undertaking continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in the United Kingdom answered a questionnaire about available facilities and their own practices. The responses suggest that many units are struggling with unsatisfactory environmental facilities and inadequate staff. Working methods, diagnostic facilities and therapeutic policies varied considerably from unit to unit. We need more information about the influence of such variables on the results of CAPD and its complications, particularly peritonitis. The use of CAPO for the management of end-stage renal failure in the United Kingdom has increased dramatically since its introduction in 1978 (I, 2). Although statistics from the European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EDT A) revealed a high technique failure rate and considerable morbidity from catheter and peritonitis problems (2, 3), individual units have reported better results (4, 5, 6). Discussion with nephrologists in the United Kingdom suggested that there were marked differences between renal units in the techniques used and the facilities available for the practice of CAPD, and that these might be reflected in the results of treatment. Therefore, we circulated a questionnaire to the 59 dialysis units in the United Kingdom requesting information concerning their facilities, practices, and the ways in which they diagnosed and managed CAPD-related infection in 1982. Replies were received from 52 units; of these six were not using CAPD and five others were pediatric centres. The questionnaires from the remaining 41 adult renal units were analysed for this report.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 2092-2097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Durcan ◽  
William A. Clarke ◽  
Laurence S. Magder ◽  
Michelle Petri

Objective.Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is used for its effect on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity and longterm benefits. This can be limited by adherence. One way to assess adherence is to measure blood levels. Conflicting data exist regarding blood levels and disease activity. There is disagreement about dosing; rheumatologists recommend weight-based dosing while some other specialists advocate height-based “ideal body weight” dosing.Methods.Patients were prescribed HCQ not exceeding 6.5 mg/kg (max 400 mg/day). In hemodialysis, the dose was 200 mg after each session, and in renal insufficiency it was 200 mg/day. Levels were measured at each visit with a therapeutic range of 500–2000 ng/ml. Patients were divided according to baseline blood level. To assess the effect of measurement and counseling on adherence, we compared the proportion of patients with a level of 500 ng/ml or higher based on the number of prior assessments.Results.The proportion of patients with HCQ levels in the therapeutic range differed significantly by age, sex, and Vitamin D level. There was a trend toward lower levels with renal failure. Blood levels were similar regardless of height and ideal body weight. Comparing those with undetectable, subtherapeutic, and therapeutic levels, disease activity decreased (SLE Disease Activity Index 2.92, 2.36, and 2.20, p = 0.04 for trend). At first, 56% were therapeutic, and by the third measurement this increased to 80% (p ≤ 0.0001).Conclusion.There was a trend toward higher disease activity with lower HCQ levels. Renal failure dosing led to suboptimum levels. We show that weight-based dosing (max 400 mg daily) is appropriate and that height does not appear to influence levels. Measurement, counseling, and repeated testing can increase adherence rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document