Some cost implications of introducing

1978 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 184
Keyword(s):  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. e0190847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Dullaert-de Boer ◽  
Onno W. Akkerman ◽  
Marloes Vermeer ◽  
Dorine L. J. Hess ◽  
Huib A. M. Kerstjens ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
M Omair ◽  
L Soh ◽  
AC Yeoh ◽  
C Moran ◽  
C Green ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra A. Dickehuth ◽  
Margaret A. Adams ◽  
Fred P. Hayoz

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1067-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Pan ◽  
Alistair G. F. Gibb ◽  
Andrew B. Sellars

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Isobel Clough

The NHS is facing an unprecedented backlog in both patient care and building maintenance, with severe implications for service delivery, finance and population wellbeing. This article is the first in a series discussing modular healthcare facilities as a potential solution to these issues, providing flexible and cost-effective spaces to allow services to increase capacity without sacrificing care quality. The first of three instalments, this paper will outline the problems facing the NHS estate, many of which have been exacerbated to critical levels by the COVID-19 pandemic, and what this means for service delivery. It will then make the case for modular infrastructure, outlining the potential benefits for healthcare services, staff and patients alike. Using modern methods of construction, this approach to creating physical space in healthcare can provide greater flexibility and a reduced impact on the environment. The next two articles in this series will go on to provide detailed case studies of successful modular implementation in NHS trusts, an analysis of the cost implications and guidance on the commissioning process and building a business case.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document