Infrared thermometry in the measurement of heat stress in firefighters wearing protective clothing

1991 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 422-423
Author(s):  
T.C. Hower ◽  
K.D. Blehm
Ergonomics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
INGVAR HOLMÉR

1998 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 1731-1739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen S. Cheung ◽  
Tom M. McLellan

—The purpose of the present study was to determine the separate and combined effects of aerobic fitness, short-term heat acclimation, and hypohydration on tolerance during light exercise while wearing nuclear, biological, and chemical protective clothing in the heat (40°C, 30% relative humidity). Men who were moderately fit [(MF); <50 ml ⋅ kg−1 ⋅ min−1maximal O2 consumption; n = 7] and highly fit [(HF); >55 ml ⋅ kg−1 ⋅ min−1maximal O2 consumption; n = 8] were tested while they were euhydrated or hypohydrated by ∼2.5% of body mass through exercise and fluid restriction the day preceding the trials. Tests were conducted before and after 2 wk of daily heat acclimation (1-h treadmill exercise at 40°C, 30% relative humidity, while wearing the nuclear, biological, and chemical protective clothing). Heat acclimation increased sweat rate and decreased skin temperature and rectal temperature (Tre) in HF subjects but had no effect on tolerance time (TT). MF subjects increased sweat rate but did not alter heart rate, Tre, or TT. In both MF and HF groups, hypohydration significantly increased Tre and heart rate and decreased the respiratory exchange ratio and the TT regardless of acclimation state. Overall, the rate of rise of skin temperature was less, while ΔTre, the rate of rise of Tre, and the TT were greater in HF than in MF subjects. It was concluded that exercise-heat tolerance in this uncompensable heat-stress environment is not influenced by short-term heat acclimation but is significantly improved by long-term aerobic fitness.


2014 ◽  
pp. 416-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bishop ◽  
K. Crew ◽  
J. Wingo ◽  
A. Nawaiseh

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Colvin ◽  
Virginia S. Colvin ◽  
Yvonne G. Bryant ◽  
Linda G. Hayes ◽  
Michael A. Spieker

Abstract Under SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research) programs from the U.S. Marine Corps, investigators at Triangle Research and Development Corporation (TRDC) have conducted research toward the development of a unique passive cooling garment to provide significant microclimate cooling to Marines dressed in NBC (Nuclear/Biological/Chemical) protective clothing. The patented PECS (Protective Environmental Control System) garment utilizes 3–4 mm diameter macroencapsulated phase change material (macroPCM) particles distributed throughout a lightweight and highly breathable vest garment to provide 1–3 hours of cooling in high heat stress environments. With polymer walls encapsulating the paraffin PCM, the macroPCMs provide a wearable, packed bed heat exchanger that is flexible, highly breathable, and undergoes its solid/liquid phase change from 25–28°C, where its high latent heat storage can reach 60 calories/gram. This cooling range is at elevated and more comfortable temperatures than gel media used in other passive microclimate garments, which store their cold near 0°C and can cause shivering and discomfort. Although other microclimate garments require refrigeration or freezers to thermally recharge the cooling media, the passive 5-lb PECS cooling garment can be thermally recharged in the field at room temperatures (15–20°C) without refrigeration. Although earlier publications described the principles for such a cooling garment, this publication is the first to describe the garment’s construction, development and testing. Extensive laboratory testing has included Marine volunteers on a treadmill in a heated environmental chamber while dressed in Level IV MOPP and Level A protective clothing and a gas mask. PECS has also been used by costumed characters at Walt Disney World to provide extended cooling within an extended heat stress environment. Besides military uses, passive macroPCM garments should find other applications; including: protective clothing for firefighters, industrial workers, costumed characters and persons with heat stress disabilities.


1999 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 308-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom M. McLellan ◽  
Greg A. Gannon ◽  
Jiri Zamecnik ◽  
Valerie Gil ◽  
Greg M. Brown

This study examined whether the reported hypothermic effect of melatonin ingestion increased tolerance to exercise at 40°C, for trials conducted either in the morning or afternoon, while subjects were wearing protective clothing. Nine men performed four randomly ordered trials; two each in the morning (0930) and afternoon (1330) after the double-blind ingestion of either two placebo capsules or two 1-mg capsules of melatonin. Despite significant elevations in plasma melatonin to over 1,000 ng/ml 1 h after the ingestion of the first 1-mg dose, rectal temperature (Tre) was unchanged before or during the heat-stress exposure. Also, all other indexes of temperature regulation and the heart rate response during the uncompensable heat stress were unaffected by the ingestion of melatonin. Initial Tre was increased during the afternoon (37.1 ± 0.2°C), compared with the morning (36.8 ± 0.2°C) exposures, and these differences remained throughout the uncompensable heat stress, such that final Tre was also increased for the afternoon (39.2 ± 0.2°C) vs. the morning (39.0 ± 0.3°C) trials. Tolerance times and heat storage were not different among the exposures at ∼110 min and 16 kJ/kg, respectively. It was concluded that this low dose of melatonin had no impact on tolerance to uncompensable heat stress and that trials conducted in the early afternoon were associated with an increased Tre tolerated at exhaustion that offset the circadian influence on resting Tre and thus maintained tolerance times similar to those of trials conducted in the morning.


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (6 (Suppl. 2)) ◽  
pp. S121-S130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom M. McLellan ◽  
George Havenith

Physical employment standards (PESs) exist for certain occupational groups that also require the use of protective clothing ensembles (PCEs) during their normal work. This review addresses whether these current PESs appropriately incorporate the physiological burden associated with wearing PCEs during respective tasks. Metabolic heat production increases because of wearing PCE; this increase is greater than that because of simply the weight of the clothing and can vary 2-fold among individuals. This variation negates a simple adjustment to the PES for the effect of the clothing on metabolic rate. As a result, PES testing that only simulates the weight of the clothing and protective equipment does not adequately accommodate this effect. The physiological heat strain associated with the use of PCEs is also not addressed with current PESs. Typically the selection tests of a PES lasts less than 20 min, whereas the requirement for use of PCE in the workplace may approach 1 h before cooling strategies can be employed. One option that might be considered is to construct a heat stress test that requires new recruits and incumbents to work for a predetermined duration while exposed to a warm environmental temperature while wearing the PCE.


1997 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Lynn Caldwell ◽  
John A. Caldwell ◽  
Charles A. Salter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document