heat acclimation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

577
(FIVE YEARS 137)

H-INDEX

49
(FIVE YEARS 6)

2022 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Andro P. Ramos ◽  
Carly J. Brade ◽  
Kagan J. Ducker ◽  
Grant J. Landers ◽  
Olivier Girard

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenz S. Kissling ◽  
Ashley P. Akerman ◽  
Holly A. Campbell ◽  
Jamie R. Prout ◽  
Travis D. Gibbons ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin Travers ◽  
José González-Alonso ◽  
Nathan Riding ◽  
David Nichols ◽  
Anthony Shaw ◽  
...  

Permissive dehydration during exercise heat acclimation (HA) may enhance hematological and cardiovascular adaptations and thus acute responses to prolonged exercise. However, the independent role of permissive dehydration on vascular and cardiac volumes, ventricular-arterial (VA) coupling and systemic hemodynamics has not been systematically investigated. Seven males completed two 10-day exercise HA interventions with controlled heart rate (HR) where euhydration was maintained or permissive dehydration (-2.9 ± 0.5% body mass) occurred. Two experimental trials were conducted before and after each HA intervention where euhydration was maintained (-0.5 ± 0.4%) or dehydration was induced (-3.6 ± 0.6%) via prescribed fluid intakes. Rectal (Tre) and skin temperatures, HR, blood (BV) and left ventricular (LV) volumes, and systemic hemodynamics were measured at rest and during bouts of semi-recumbent cycling (55% V̇O2peak) in 33°C at 20, 100, and 180 min. Throughout HA sweat rate (12 ± 9%) and power output (18 ± 7 W) increased (P < 0.05), whereas Tre was 38.4 ± 0.2°C during the 75 min of HR controlled exercise (P = 1.00). Neither HA intervention altered resting and euhydrated exercising Tre, BV, LV diastolic and systolic volumes, systemic hemodynamics, and VA coupling (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the thermal and cardiovascular strain during exercise with acute dehydration post-HA was not influenced by HA hydration strategy. Instead, elevations in Tre and HR and reductions in BV and cardiac output matched pre-HA levels (P > 0.05). These findings indicate that permissive dehydration during exercise HA with controlled HR and maintained thermal stimulus does not affect hematological or cardiovascular responses during acute endurance exercise under moderate heat stress with maintained euhydration or moderate dehydration.


Author(s):  
Hadiatou Barry ◽  
Philippe Gendron ◽  
Christine Gagnon ◽  
Louis Bherer ◽  
Daniel Gagnon

Purpose: This study evaluated if passive controlled hyperthermia heat acclimation (HA) modulates cognitive performance during passive heat stress. Methods: Eight healthy adults (25 ± 4 years) underwent 7 consecutive days of hot water immersion (core temperature ≥38.6°C) and a 7-day time-control period. On days 1 and 7 of HA, participants performed a digital Stroop test at baseline, when core temperature reached 38.6°C, and after 60 minutes at a core temperature ≥38.6°C to evaluate reaction time during tasks targeting processing speed (reading and counting) and executive functions (inhibition and switching). On days 1 and 7 of the time-control intervention, participants performed the Stroop test with equivalent amounts of time separating each task as for HA. Results: During day 1 of HA, reaction time was quicker during the reading (-44 ms [-71, -17], P<0.01) and counting (-39 ms [-76, -2], P=0.04) tasks when rectal temperature reached 38.6°C, but after a further 60 minutes of heat exposure, reaction time only remained quicker during the reading task (-56 ms [-83, -29], P<0.01). Changes in reaction time during heat exposure were unaffected by subsequent HA (interaction, all P≥0.09). Conclusion: Seven days of HA does not modulate processing speed and executive functions during passive heat exposure. Novelty: - Whether heat acclimation (HA) to improve cognitive performance during heat exposure remains understudied. - We tested the hypothesis that HA modulates reaction time during cognitive tasks performed at matched levels of thermal strain. - Despite classical signs of HA, reaction time during heat exposure was unaffected by HA.


2021 ◽  
pp. 194173812110506
Author(s):  
Yasuki Sekiguchi ◽  
Courteney L. Benjamin ◽  
Ciara N. Manning ◽  
Jeb F. Struder ◽  
Lawrence E. Armstrong ◽  
...  

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of heat acclimatization (HAz) followed by heat acclimation (HA), and intermittent heat training (IHT) on time-trial performance. Hypothesis: Time-trial performance will improve after HA and will further improve with twice a week of IHT. Study Design: Interventional study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: A total of 26 male athletes (mean ± SD; age, 35 ± 12 years; body mass, 72.8 ± 8.9 kg; peak oxygen consumption [VO2peak], 57.3 ± 6.7 mL·kg−1·min−1) completed five 4-km time trials (baseline, post-HAz, post-HA, post-IHT4, post-IHT8) in the heat (ambient temperature, 35.4°C ± 0.3°C; relative humidity, 46.7% ± 1.2%) on a motorized treadmill. After baseline time trial, participants performed HAz (109 ± 10 days) followed by post-HAz time trial. Then, participants completed 5 days of HA, which involved exercising to induce hyperthermia (38.50°C-39.75°C) for 60 minutes. Participants were then divided into 3 groups and completed IHT either twice per week (IHTMAX), once per week (IHTMIN), or not at all (IHTCON) over an 8-week period. The exercise used for the IHT matched the HA. Four-kilometer time trials were performed after 4 weeks (post-IHT4) and 8 weeks of IHT (post-IHT8). Results: Time trial was faster in post-HA (17.98 ± 2.51 minutes) compared with baseline (18.61 ± 3.06 minutes; P = 0.037) and post-HAz (18.66 ± 3.12 minutes; P = 0.023). Percentage change in time trial was faster in IHTMAX (−3.9% ± 5.2%) compared with IHTCON (11.5% ± 16.9%) ( P = 0.020) and approached statistical significance with large effect (effect size = 0.96) compared with IHTMIN (1.6% ± 6.2%; P = 0.059) at post-IHT8. Additionally, IHTMAX (−2.2% ± 4.2%) was faster than IHTCON (3.6% ± 6.9%) ( P = 0.05) at post-IHT4. Conclusion: These results indicate that HA after HAz induces additional improvement in time-trial performance. IHT twice per week shows improvement after 8 weeks, while once per week maintains performance for 8 weeks. No IHT results in a loss of adaptations after 4 weeks and even greater losses after 8 weeks. Clinical Relevance: HA after HAz improves time-trial performance, twice a week of IHT improves performance further, and once a week of IHT maintains performance for at least 8 weeks.


Author(s):  
Courteney L. Benjamin ◽  
Yasuki Sekiguchi ◽  
Lawrence E. Armstrong ◽  
Ciara N. Manning ◽  
Jeb F. Struder ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mohamed Farghly ◽  
Khalid Mahrose ◽  
Mohammed Abougabal ◽  
Mossad Taboosha ◽  
Reham Ali

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document