Selection of visual targets for the initiation of saccadic eye movements

Primate vision is characterized by constant, sequential processing and selection of visual targets to fixate. Although expected reward is known to influence both processing and selection of visual targets, similarities and differences between these effects remain unclear mainly because they have been measured in separate tasks. Using a novel paradigm, we simultaneously measured the effects of reward outcomes and expected reward on target selection and sensitivity to visual motion in monkeys. Monkeys freely chose between two visual targets and received a juice reward with varying probability for eye movements made to either of them. Targets were stationary apertures of drifting gratings, causing the end points of eye movements to these targets to be systematically biased in the direction of motion. We used this motion-induced bias as a measure of sensitivity to visual motion on each trial. We then performed different analyses to explore effects of objective and subjective reward values on choice and sensitivity to visual motion to find similarities and differences between reward effects on these two processes. Specifically, we used different reinforcement learning models to fit choice behavior and estimate subjective reward values based on the integration of reward outcomes over multiple trials. Moreover, to compare the effects of subjective reward value on choice and sensitivity to motion directly, we considered correlations between each of these variables and integrated reward outcomes on a wide range of timescales. We found that, in addition to choice, sensitivity to visual motion was also influenced by subjective reward value, although the motion was irrelevant for receiving reward. Unlike choice, however, sensitivity to visual motion was not affected by objective measures of reward value. Moreover, choice was determined by the difference in subjective reward values of the two options, whereas sensitivity to motion was influenced by the sum of values. Finally, models that best predicted visual processing and choice used sets of estimated reward values based on different types of reward integration and timescales. Together, our results demonstrate separable influences of reward on visual processing and choice, and point to the presence of multiple brain circuits for the integration of reward outcomes.

Download Full-text

Effects of superior temporal polysensory area lesions on eye movements in the macaque monkey

Journal of Neurophysiology ◽

10.1152/jn.1995.73.1.1 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 73 (1) ◽

pp. 1-19 ◽

Cited By ~ 21

Author(s):

S. P. Scalaidhe ◽

T. D. Albright ◽

H. R. Rodman ◽

C. G. Gross

Keyword(s):

Eye Movements ◽

Smooth Pursuit ◽

Temporal Cortex ◽

Saccadic Eye Movements ◽

Saccade Latency ◽

Vertical Meridian ◽

Central Fixation Point ◽

Visuomotor Behavior ◽

Visual Targets ◽

Central Fixation

1. On the basis of its anatomic connections and single-unit properties, the superior temporal polysensory area (STP) would seem to be primarily involved in visuospatial functions. We have examined the effects of lesions of STP on saccadic eye movements, visual fixation, and smooth pursuit eye movements to directly test the hypothesis that STP is involved in visuospatial and visuomotor behavior. 2. Seven monkeys were trained to make saccades to targets 8, 15, and 22 degrees from a central fixation point along the horizontal meridian and 8 degrees from the central fixation point along the vertical meridian. One monkey was also trained to make saccades to auditory targets. The same monkeys were trained to foveate a stationary central fixation point and to follow it with a smooth pursuit eye movement when it began moving 5, 13, or 20 degrees/s. Four monkeys received unilateral STP lesions, one received a bilateral STP lesion, and as a control, two received unilateral inferior temporal cortex (IT) lesions. After testing, three of the animals with unilateral STP lesions received an additional STP lesion in the hemisphere contralateral to the first lesion. Similarly, one animal with a unilateral IT lesion received an additional IT lesion in the hemisphere contralateral to the first lesion. 3. All monkeys with complete removal of STP showed a significant increase in saccade latency to the most peripheral contralateral target, and most also had increased saccade latencies to the other contralateral targets. Saccades directed to targets along the vertical meridian or toward targets in the hemifield ipsilateral to the lesion were not impaired by removal of STP. By contrast, IT lesions did not impair the monkeys' ability to make saccadic eye movements to visual stimuli at any location, showing that saccades to visually guided targets are not impaired nonspecifically by damage to visual cortex. 4. The deficit in making eye movements after STP lesions was specific to saccade latency, with little effect on the accuracy of saccades to visual targets. 5. In the one monkey trained to make saccades to auditory targets, removal of STP did not impair saccades to auditory targets contralateral to its lesion, despite this monkey showing the largest increase in saccades latencies to visual targets. 6. There was complete recovery of saccade latency to the baseline level of performance on the saccade task after all STP lesions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Download Full-text

Observations on the selection of targets for saccadic eye movements.

10.1349/ddlp.3293 ◽

2000 ◽

Author(s):

Michael David Nelson

Keyword(s):

Eye Movements ◽

Saccadic Eye Movements ◽

Selection Of

Download Full-text

Sensorimotor integration in the primate superior colliculus. I. Motor convergence

Journal of Neurophysiology ◽

10.1152/jn.1987.57.1.22 ◽

1987 ◽

Vol 57 (1) ◽

pp. 22-34 ◽

Cited By ~ 141

Author(s):

M. F. Jay ◽

D. L. Sparks

Keyword(s):

Eye Movements ◽

Superior Colliculus ◽

Visual Stimuli ◽

Saccadic Eye Movements ◽

Visual Signals ◽

M Cells ◽

Efferent Pathway ◽

Saccadic Velocity ◽

Visual Targets ◽

Sensory Responses

Orienting movements of the eyes and head are made to both auditory and visual stimuli even though in the primary sensory pathways the locations of auditory and visual stimuli are encoded in different coordinates. This study was designed to differentiate between two possible mechanisms for sensory-to-motor transformation. Auditory and visual signals could be translated into common coordinates in order to share a single motor pathway or they could maintain anatomically separate sensory and motor routes for the initiation and guidance of orienting eye movements. The primary purpose of the study was to determine whether neurons in the superior colliculus (SC) that discharge before saccades to visual targets also discharge before saccades directed toward auditory targets. If they do, this would indicate that auditory and visual signals, originally encoded in different coordinates, have been converted into a single coordinate system and are sharing a motor circuit. Trained monkeys made saccadic eye movements to auditory or visual targets while the activity of visual-motor (V-M) cells and saccade-related burst (SRB) cells was monitored. The pattern of spike activity observed during trials in which saccades were made to visual targets was compared with that observed when comparable saccades were made to auditory targets. For most (57 of 59) V-M cells, sensory responses were observed only on visual trials. Auditory stimuli originating from the same region of space did not activate these cells. Yet, of the 72 V-M and SRB cells studied, 79% showed motor bursts prior to saccades to either auditory or visual targets. This finding indicates that visual and auditory signals, originally encoded in retinal and head-centered coordinates, respectively, have undergone a transformation that allows them to share a common efferent pathway for the generation of saccadic eye movements. Saccades to auditory targets usually have lower velocities than saccades of the same amplitude and direction made to acquire visual targets. Since fewer collicular cells are active prior to saccades to auditory targets, one determinant of saccadic velocity may be the number of collicular neurons discharging before a particular saccade.

Download Full-text

Dynamics and efficacy of saccade-facilitated vergence eye movements in monkeys

Journal of Neurophysiology ◽

10.1152/jn.1992.68.4.1248 ◽

1992 ◽

Vol 68 (4) ◽

pp. 1248-1260 ◽

Cited By ~ 72

Author(s):

J. S. Maxwell ◽

W. M. King

Keyword(s):

Eye Movements ◽

Saccadic Eye Movements ◽

Rate Of Change ◽

Viewing Distance ◽

Midsagittal Plane ◽

Gaze Shifts ◽

The Gaze ◽

Visual Targets ◽

Linear Addition ◽

Peak Speed

1. Four macaque monkeys were trained to fixate visual targets. Eye movements were recorded binocularly using the search coil technique. Saccades, vergence movements, and combinations of the two were elicited by training the monkeys to alternate the gaze between real visual targets that differed in viewing distance and eccentricity with respect to the monkeys' heads. 2. When they shifted the gaze between targets that were at different viewing distances, the monkeys made vergence eye movements. For targets placed along the midsagittal plane, the monkeys often made binocularly symmetric vergence movements. The peak speed of symmetric divergence movements increased linearly with vergence amplitude by 5.7 deg/s per degree of vergence. The peak speed of symmetric convergence movements increased linearly with vergence amplitude by 7.9 deg/s per degree of vergence. 3. For gaze shifts between targets placed eccentrically with respect to the midsagittal plane and at different viewing distances, the monkeys made saccades in combination with vergence eye movements. When a saccade occurred during a vergence movement, peak vergence eye speed increased abruptly and reached a peak that was proportional to the speed of the saccade. For four monkeys, peak divergence speed ranged from 242 to 315 deg/s and peak convergence speed ranged from 257 to 340 deg/s for 16-deg vergence and 20-deg saccadic eye movements. 4. For gaze shifts between far targets at the same viewing distance but different eccentricities, saccadic eye movements were transiently disjunctive even though there was no vergence requirement. Initially, the eyes diverged and then converged to restore fixation to the correct depth plane. Divergence was followed by convergence regardless of the direction of the saccade. 5. The presence of transient saccade-related disjunctive eye movements suggested that the abrupt increase in peak vergence speed during combined saccadic and vergence eye movements was produced by the linear addition of a vergence eye movement and the saccade-related transients. Consistent with this hypothesis, the rate of change in peak vergence speed during various-sized saccades between far targets (no vergence required) was similar to the rate of change in peak vergence speed during combined saccadic and vergence movements. However, the peak vergence speeds during the combined movements were higher than predicted by the linear addition hypothesis, suggesting the presence of an additional mechanism. 6. The saccade-related increase in peak vergence speed during combined saccades and vergences led to a significant decrease in the amount of time required to complete vergence movements.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Download Full-text

Modification of saccadic eye movements by GABA-related substances. II. Effects of muscimol in monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata

Journal of Neurophysiology ◽

10.1152/jn.1985.53.1.292 ◽

1985 ◽

Vol 53 (1) ◽

pp. 292-308 ◽

Cited By ~ 316

Author(s):

O. Hikosaka ◽

R. H. Wurtz

Keyword(s):

Eye Movements ◽

Substantia Nigra ◽

Saccadic Eye Movements ◽

Tonic Inhibition ◽

Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata ◽

Inhibitory Input ◽

General Effect ◽

Gamma Aminobutyric Acid ◽

Gaba Agonist ◽

Visual Targets

The preceding study (21) showed that a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonist or antagonist injected into the superior colliculus (SC) disrupted saccadic eye movements. The purpose of the present experiments was to determine whether this result was due to altering the inhibitory input to the SC from the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr). SNr cells are themselves inhibited by GABA. Injection of muscimol, a GABA agonist, into the SNr should increase the inhibition acting on SNr cells and should reduce the inhibition acting on the SC. If the effects of GABA inhibition in the SC results from terminals originating in the SNr, muscimol in the SNr should act like bicuculline in the SC. Muscimol in the SNr has the same general effect as bicuculline in the SC. The monkey made irrepressible saccades toward the contralateral visual field where cells in the SNr at the injection site had their visual or movement field. During visual fixation saccadic jerks occurred, interspersed with spontaneous saccades, instead of saccades to visual targets or to remembered targets. Saccades to remembered targets were more vulnerable to these saccadic intrusions than were saccades to visual targets. Since muscimol in the SNr acts like bicuculline in the SC, we conclude that a substantial fraction of GABA-mediated inhibitory inputs in the SC originates from the SNr. These experiments, in conjunction with previous experiments, show that the SNr exerts a tonic inhibition on saccade-related cells in SC and that this inhibition is mediated by GABA. The role of the SNr in initiation of saccades to remembered targets is particularly important since these saccades are more severely disrupted by muscimol in the SNr as well as in the SC. We suggest that both of these conclusions about eye movement might apply to skeletal movements as well. First, the basal ganglia contribute to the initiation of movement by a release of the target structure from tonic inhibition. Second, this mechanism is particularly critical of the movements based on stored or remembered signals that are not currently available as incoming sensory inputs.

Download Full-text

Separable influences of reward on visual processing and choice

10.1101/2020.04.07.029942 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Alireza Soltani ◽

Mohsen Rakhshan ◽

Robert J Schafer ◽

Brittany E Burrows ◽

Tirin Moore

Keyword(s):

Eye Movements ◽

Visual Processing ◽

Visual Motion ◽

Target Selection ◽

Wide Range ◽

Reward Value ◽

Similarities And Differences ◽

Visual Targets ◽

Reinforcement Learning Models ◽

Selection Of

AbstractPrimate vision is characterized by constant, sequential processing and selection of visual targets to fixate. Although expected reward is known to influence both processing and selection of visual targets, similarities and differences between these effects remains unclear mainly because they have been measured in separate tasks. Using a novel paradigm, we simultaneously measured the effects of reward outcomes and expected reward on target selection and sensitivity to visual motion in monkeys. Monkeys freely chose between two visual targets and received a juice reward with varying probability for eye movements made to either of them. Targets were stationary apertures of drifting gratings, causing the endpoints of eye movements to these targets to be systematically biased in the direction of motion. We used this motion-induced bias as a measure of sensitivity to visual motion on each trial. We then performed different analyses to explore effects of objective and subjective reward values on choice and sensitivity to visual motion in order to find similarities and differences between reward effects on these two processes. Specifically, we used different reinforcement learning models to fit choice behavior and estimate subjective reward values based on the integration of reward outcomes over multiple trials. Moreover, to compare the effects of subjective reward value on choice and sensitivity to motion directly, we considered correlations between each of these variables and integrated reward outcomes on a wide range of timescales. We found that in addition to choice, sensitivity to visual motion was also influenced by subjective reward value, even though the motion was irrelevant for receiving reward. Unlike choice, however, sensitivity to visual motion was not affected by objective measures of reward value. Moreover, choice was determined by the difference in subjective reward values of the two options whereas sensitivity to motion was influenced by the sum of values. Finally, models that best predicted visual processing and choice used sets of estimated reward values based on different types of reward integration and timescales. Together, our results demonstrate separable influences of reward on visual processing and choice, and point to the presence of multiple brain circuits for integration of reward outcomes.

Download Full-text

The effect of task set on fixational saccadic eye movements

PsycEXTRA Dataset ◽

10.1037/e636952013-699 ◽

2013 ◽

Author(s):

Sara Spotorno ◽

Guillaume S. Masson ◽

Anna Montagnini

Keyword(s):

Eye Movements ◽

Saccadic Eye Movements ◽

Task Set

Download Full-text