Recovery of olfactory function in thirteen-day-old rats after olfactory bulb transplantation but not after olfactory bulb ablation

1996 ◽  
Vol 724 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelley M. Evers ◽  
Karen R. Hendricks ◽  
Jon N. Kott ◽  
Mary E. Lee ◽  
Mark E. Gregov ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Wang ◽  
H. You ◽  
J.-F. Liu ◽  
D.-F. Ni ◽  
Z.-X. Zhang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (29) ◽  
pp. 39-45
Author(s):  
Gabriela-Violeta Melinte ◽  
Codrut Sarafoleanu

Abstract Head trauma is considered to be the third cause of olfactory function disorders. Olfactometric assessment in patients accusing anosmia following head injury produced by car accident or aggression is important, because most of them are involved in law trials in order to obtain financial compensations from the author. It is compulsory to use both subjective and objective olfactory evaluation methods combined with a detailed anamnesis, a complete ENT examination and a good cranio-facial imaging (computed tomography or MRI) in order to exclude malingerers and to obtain an accurate diagnosis. “Sfanta Maria” ENT Department from Bucharest is the only center in Romania where the olfactory function in completely investigated. We use chemosensory (Snap and Sniff Test and n-Butanol Dynamic Olfactometry) and electrophysiological tests (electric olfactory evoked potentials of the olfactory bulb). Unfortunately, we confront with a series of difficulties in what concerns the smell function evaluation: 1) there is scarce information in the literature regarding the olfactory electric evoked potentials; 2) the electric olfactory evoked potentials register only the electrical activity in the olfactory bulb; 3) in case of olfactory impairment medically confirmed, we cannot establish a cause-effect relationship between the disturbance and the event; 4) the most accurate electrophysiological assessment method currently available in Europe is the time-frequency analysis of chemosensory event-related potentials, but we do not dispose of the necessary equipment yet; 5) sometimes patients do not give us the informed consent for a complete olfactory evaluation.


1974 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1547-1550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiaki J. Hara

Morpholine was designated as olfactorily nonstimulatory in rainbow trout as studied electrophysiologically. The morpholine-effect caused by 1% solution differs in many respects from the normal olfactory bulb response, suggesting a mechanism not directly associated with the normal olfactory function. Furthermore, 1% morpholine inhibits the olfactory sensitivity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 436-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bayram Veyseller ◽  
Berke Ozucer ◽  
Nazan Degirmenci ◽  
Defne Gurbuz ◽  
Makbule Tambas ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayaka Yagi ◽  
Richard M. Costanzo

Background Impaired olfactory function leads to a decrease in the quality of life for many patients. Surgical treatment options are limited, especially for those suffering from hyposmia or anosmia after posttraumatic injury to the olfactory nerves. Stem cells located in the olfactory epithelium (OE) have the capacity to grow new neurons, making the OE an ideal candidate for restorative tissue grafting. This study was performed to determine if strips of OE survive transplantation directly to the olfactory bulb (OB). Methods Transgenic mice, expressing a green fluorescent protein (GFP), were used to obtain the donor graft tissue. Strips of OE from GFP donor mice were transplanted directly to sites in the OB and cerebral cortex (CC; control sites) of wild-type mice. Graft survival rates at 30 days were determined for transplant sites in the OB and CC. Results Strips of OE from transgenic mice survived transplantation to the OB and continued to express the GFP marker protein. The 30-day survival rate in the OB (83%, 5 of 6 grafts) was the same as in the CC (10 of 12 grafts). The morphology of the graft revealed characteristics found in normal OE. Conclusion We showed that strips of OE can be successfully grafted to both the OB and CC. Grafts of the OE, if strategically positioned on the ventral surface of the bulb and given access to the nasal cavity, could provide the basis for new surgical treatments to restore olfactory function.


2011 ◽  
Vol 214 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hummel ◽  
M. Smitka ◽  
S. Puschmann ◽  
J. C. Gerber ◽  
B. Schaal ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document