A field-scale, natural gradient solute transport experiment in peat at a Newfoundland blanket bog

1995 ◽  
Vol 172 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 171-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.S. Hoag ◽  
J.S. Price
1986 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 2017-2029 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Mackay ◽  
D. L. Freyberg ◽  
P. V. Roberts ◽  
J. A. Cherry

1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald J. Avanzino ◽  
Gary W. Zellweger ◽  
Vance C. Kennedy ◽  
S. Marc Zand ◽  
Kenneth E. Bencala

1997 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 873-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Jacques ◽  
J. Vanderborght ◽  
D. Mallants ◽  
D.-J. Kim ◽  
H. Vereecken ◽  
...  

Abstract. In this paper the relation between local- and field-scale solute transport parameters in an unsaturated soil profile is investigated. At two experimental sites, local-scale steady-state solute transport was measured in-situ using 120 horizontally installed TDR probes at 5 depths. Local-scale solute transport parameters determined from BTCs were used to predict field-scale solute transport using stochastic stream tube models (STM). Local-scale solute transport was described by two transport models: (1) the convection-dispersion transport model (CDE), and (2) the stochastic convective lognormat transfer model (CLT). The parameters of the CDE-model were found to be lognormally distributed, whereas the parameters of the CLT model were normally distributed. Local-scale solute transport heterogeneity within the measurement volume of a TDR-probe was an important factor causing field-scale solute dispersion. The study of the horizontal scale-dependency revealed that the variability in the solute transport parameters contributes more to the field-scale dispersion at deeper depths than at depths near the surface. Three STMs were used to upscale the local transport parameters: (i) the stochastic piston flow STM-I assuming local piston flow transport, (ii) the convective-dispersive STM-II assuming local CDE transport, and (iii) the stochastic convective lognormal STM-III assuming local CLT. The STM-I considerably underpredicted the field-scale solute dispersion indicating that local-scale dispersion processes, which are captured within the measurement volume of the TDR-probe, are important to predict field-scale solute transport. STM-II and STM-III both described the field-scale breakthrough curves (BTC) accurately if depth dependent parameters were used. In addition, a reasonable description of the horizontal variance of the local BTCs was found. STM-III was (more) superior to STM-II if only one set of parameters from one depth is used to predict the field-scale solute BTCs at several depths. This indicates that the local-scale solute transport process, as measured with TDR in this study, is in agreement with the CLT-hypothesis.


1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. B. Bronswijk ◽  
W. Hamminga ◽  
K. Oostindie

1997 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 853-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Vanderborght ◽  
D. Jacques ◽  
D. Mallants ◽  
P.-H. Tseng ◽  
J. Feyen

Abstract. Abstract: Field-scale solute dispersion is determined by water flow heterogeneity which results from spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties and soil moisture state. Measured variabilities of soil hydraulic properties are highly sensitive to the experimental method. Field-scale dispersion derived from leaching experiments in a macroporous loam soil was compared with field-scale dispersion obtained with numerical simulations in heterogeneous random fields. Four types of random fields of hydraulic properties having statistical properties derived from four different types of laboratory measurements were considered. Based on this comparison, the measurement method depicting heterogeneities of hydraulic properties most relevant to field-scale solute transport was identified. For unsaturated flow, the variability of the hydraulic conductivity characteristic measured on a small soil volume was the most relevant parameter. For saturated flow, simulated dispersion underestimated the measured dispersion and it was concluded that heterogeneity of macroscopic hydraulic properties could not represent solute flow heterogeneity under these flow conditions. Field-scale averaged solute concentrations depend both on the detection method and the averaging procedure. Flux-averaged concentrations (relevant to practical applications) differ from volume-averaged or resident concentrations (easy to measure), especially when water flow is more heterogeneous. Simulated flux and resident concentrations were subsequently used to test two simple one-dimensional transport models in predicting flux concentrations when they are calibrated on resident concentrations. In the first procedure, solute transport in a heterogeneous soil is represented by a 1-D convection dispersion process. The second procedure was based on the relation between flux and resident concentrations for a stochastic convective process. Better predictions of flux concentrations were obtained using the second procedure, especially when water flow and solute transport are very heterogeneous.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document