Estimation of a preference matrix for women's choice of male sexual partner according to rate of partner change, using partner notification data

1991 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredrik Granath ◽  
Johan Giesecke ◽  
Gianpaolo Scalia-Tomba ◽  
Kristina Ramstedt ◽  
Lars Forssman
Author(s):  
Bobo H. P. Lau ◽  
Lucia Liu ◽  
Celia H. Y. Chan ◽  
Cecilia L. W. Chan ◽  
Jason J. Ong ◽  
...  

Background: Chlamydia is common amongst the sexually active population in Hong Kong. As most cases are asymptomatic, partner notification may be helpful in controlling chlamydia. This study examined attitudes towards partner notification for chlamydia among Hong Kong Chinese youths in order to inform a culturally appropriate, patient-empowering sexual health service. Methods: Sixteen individuals (aged 20 to 31) who received a confirmed diagnosis of chlamydia within the previous twelve months of data collection were recruited from two community-based organizations between June and December 2017. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted by a health psychologist. Results: Nine participants notified a total of eleven current and ex-partners. Seven participants did not notify their sexual partner(s). Our findings revealed how participants struggled with the discrediting sexual aspect of their infection, and how de-sexualizing the infection and selected disclosure facilitated partner notification and social acceptance. Perceived stigma regarding chlamydia however did not dissipate with their disclosure. Participants did not perceive lasting impact of chlamydia on their well-being as they thought they have much control over whether and how to disclose to their (future) partners. All participants agreed there was a pressing need to raise public awareness on this silent but highly prevalent sexually transmitted infection. Conclusions: Our findings illustrate the complex struggle behind communicating about chlamydia to one’s sexual partner and how strategizing the disclosure process served to circumvent embarrassment and foster testing of sexual partners.


2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 1898-1903 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. J. Edelman ◽  
◽  
K. S. Gordon ◽  
M. Hogben ◽  
S. Crystal ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald B. Langille ◽  
Jean R. Hughes ◽  
Mary E. Delaney ◽  
Janet A. Rigby

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 295-298
Author(s):  
Weibin Cheng ◽  
Wei Jin ◽  
Yuzhou Gu ◽  
Fei Zhong ◽  
Zhigang Han ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carine R. Mores ◽  
Travis K. Price ◽  
Bridget Brassil ◽  
Catherine Putonti ◽  
Alan J. Wolfe

Streptococcus mitis is a member of the mitis group of the genus Streptococcus, which includes commensal species of the oral cavity and upper respiratory tract. Here, we report 39 complete genome sequences of S. mitis strains isolated from the oral cavity and urogenital tract of a woman and her male sexual partner.


2021 ◽  
pp. sextrans-2020-054846
Author(s):  
Claudia S Estcourt ◽  
Paul Flowers ◽  
Jackie A Cassell ◽  
Maria Pothoulaki ◽  
Gabriele Vojt ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo develop a classification of sexual partner types for use in partner notification (PN) for STIs.MethodsA four-step process: (1) an iterative synthesis of five sources of evidence: scoping review of social and health sciences literature on partner types; analysis of relationship types in dating apps; systematic review of PN intervention content; and review of PN guidelines; qualitative interviews with public, patients and health professionals to generate an initial comprehensive classification; (2) multidisciplinary clinical expert consultation to revise the classification; (3) piloting of the revised classification in sexual health clinics during a randomised controlled trial of PN; (4) application of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify index patients’ willingness to engage in PN for each partner type.ResultsFive main partner types emerged from the evidence synthesis and consultation: ‘established partner’, ‘new partner’, ‘occasional partner’, ‘one-off partner’ and ‘sex worker’. The types differed across several dimensions, including likely perceptions of sexual exclusivity, likelihood of sex reoccurring between index patient and sex partner. Sexual health professionals found the classification easy to operationalise. During the trial, they assigned all 3288 partners described by 2223 index patients to a category. The TDF analysis suggested that the partner types might be associated with different risks of STI reinfection, onward transmission and index patients’ engagement with PN.ConclusionsWe developed an evidence-informed, useable classification of five sexual partner types to underpin PN practice and other STI prevention interventions. Analysis of biomedical, psychological and social factors that distinguish different partner types shows how each could warrant a tailored PN approach. This classification could facilitate the use of partner-centred outcomes. Additional studies are needed to determine the utility of the classification to improve measurement of the impact of PN strategies and help focus resources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document