A high resolution system for van de Graaff accelerators

1969 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Gaarde ◽  
T. Huus ◽  
P.B. Jørgensen ◽  
K. Kemp
2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2360-2363 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Cobos ◽  
M. Maicas ◽  
M. Sanz ◽  
C. Aroca

1970 ◽  
Vol 146 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Amezquita ◽  
C.P. Moore ◽  
K.P. Lieb ◽  
J.G. Kulleck ◽  
M. Koike ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo H Moriyama ◽  
Eric Leung ◽  
Naz Chaudary ◽  
Tuula Kalliomaki ◽  
Richard P Hill ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 756-765
Author(s):  
Ndalla Essengue Gloire ◽  
Wembe Tafo Evariste ◽  
Djamet Yimga Arnaud ◽  
Folla Kamdem Jérôme ◽  
Essimbi Zobo Bernard

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Tonani ◽  
Peter Sykes ◽  
Robert R. King ◽  
Niall McConnell ◽  
Anne-Christine Pequignet ◽  
...  

Abstract. The North-West European shelf ocean forecasting system has been providing oceanographic products for the European continental shelf seas for more than fifteen years. In that time several different configurations have been implemented, updating the model and the data assimilation components. The latest configuration to be put in operations, an eddy resolving model at 1.5 km (AMM15), replaces the 7 km model (AMM7) that has been used for a number of years. This has improved the ability to resolve the mesoscale variability in this area. An overview of this new system and its initial validation is provided in this paper, highlighting the differences with the previous version. Validation of the model is based on the results of two years (2016–2017) trial experiments run with the low and high resolution systems in their operational configuration. The 1.5 km system has been validated against observations and the low resolution system, trying to understand the impact of the high resolution on the quality of the products delivered to the users. Although the number of observations is a limiting factor, especially for the assessment of model variables like currents and salinity, the new system has been proven to be an improvement in resolving fine scale structures and variability and provides more accurate information on the major physical variables, like temperature, salinity and horizontal currents. AMM15 improvements are evident from the validation against high-resolution observations, available in some selected areas of the model domain. However, validation at the basin scale and using daily means penalised the high-resolution system and does not reflect its superior performance. This increment in resolution also improves the capabilities to provide marine information closer to the coast even if the coastal processes are not fully resolved by the model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document