We have measured the retention of information about stimulus speed in visual short-term memory by measuring speed discrimination in a two-interval forced-choice task. We have also measured such discrimination in conditions where a ‘memory masker’ is presented during the interstimulus interval (ISI) in a fashion analogous to the experiment of Magnussen et al (1991 Vision Research31 1213 – 1219). Magnussen et al found that spatial frequency discrimination was disrupted when the mask had a spatial frequency that differed from the test spatial frequency by an octave or more. We have investigated the speed discrimination of 8 Hz, 1 cycle deg−1 drifting sine-wave gratings with the following drifting masks presented in the ISI: (i) 8 Hz 1 cycle deg−1, same direction as the test; (ii) 8 Hz, 8 cycles deg−1, opposite direction to the test; (iii) 8 Hz, 8 cycles deg−1, same direction as the test; (iv) 24 Hz, 3 cycles deg−1, same direction as the test. These masks were chosen to investigate whether the temporal frequency, the spatial frequency, the speed, or the direction of motion of the mask affected retention. We found that in none of these conditions was the discrimination of the test gratings impaired significantly. This pattern of results is therefore different from that found with spatial frequency discrimination and suggests that, whatever mechanism is responsible for the retention of information about speed, it is different from that responsible for the retention of information about spatial frequency.
Temporal frequency discrimination in amblyopia
