Protection of glomerular filtration rate by the thromboxane receptor antagonist L655,240 during low dose cyclosporine administration

1992 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bunke ◽  
L. Wilder ◽  
A. Martin
1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (8) ◽  
pp. 1041-1047
Author(s):  
B A Bresnahan ◽  
R J Roman ◽  
W M Bagchus ◽  
E A Lianos

We assessed the renal hemodynamic changes occurring acutely after glomerular mesangial cell immune injury and the effects of thromboxane receptor antagonism on these changes. A single intravenous proteinuric dose of a monoclonal antibody raised against the rat thymocyte antigen Thy 1.1 (ER4), which is also expressed in rat mesangial cells, induced acute decrements in glomerular filtration rate and in renal blood flow in male Munich-Wistar rats. One hour after administration of 4 to 6 mg/kg of ER4 antibody, glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow decreased by 80 and 36%, respectively. These decrements were associated with significant increments in basal thromboxane B2 synthesis in isolated glomeruli and no changes in glomerular prostaglandin E2 synthesis. Pretreatment of animals with the thromboxane receptor antagonist SQ-29,548 (2 mg/kg) significantly ameliorated decrements in glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow. Pretreatment with a structurally dissimilar thromboxane receptor antagonist, L-670,596 (3 mg/kg) had no effect. Both antagonists at the doses employed abolished the decrements in renal blood flow induced by systemic administration of the thromboxane mimetic U-46619. Whereas the SQ-29,548 antagonist had no effect on glomerular leukotriene B4 and 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid synthesis, the L-670,596 thromboxane receptor antagonist significantly inhibited glomerular synthesis of these eicosanoids in immunologically injured glomeruli. These observations indicate that in mesangial cell immune injury the protective effect of thromboxane A2 receptor antagonism on glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow is not solely due to inhibition of the vasoconstrictor effects of thromboxane A2. An effect on the synthesis of arachidonate lipoxygenation products may also play a role.


1993 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Vidiendal Olsen ◽  
Michael Hecht Olsen ◽  
Niels Fogh-Andersen ◽  
Bo Feldt-Rasmussen ◽  
Annelise Kamper ◽  
...  

1. The effect of a single dose of lithium on renal function before and during intravenous infusion of dopamine (3 μg min−1 kg−1) was investigated in 12 healthy males. In a double-blind and randomized design, 450 mg or 600 mg of lithium carbonate or placebo was administered orally at 22.00 hours on three different occasions. After an overnight fast, the subjects were water-loaded and clearance studies were started at 09.00 hours with a 1 h baseline period and three 1 h periods during dopamine infusion. 2. Baseline sodium clearance with placebo was 0.65 ± 0.35 ml/min, but with lithium it increased to 1.25 ± 0.44 (P < 0.001) and 1.17 ± 0.46 ml/min (P < 0.01) after 450 and 600 mg, respectively. Urine flow rates were unchanged compared with placebo. Lithium did not significantly affect glomerular filtration rate, but both doses slightly increased effective renal plasma flow by 7% (P < 0.05) and 10% (P < 0.01), respectively. 3. The maximal natriuretic and diuretic effects of dopamine were not reduced by lithium, but the percentage increases in sodium clearance were significantly diminished after 450 mg (P < 0.01) and 600 mg (P < 0.001) of lithium. Lithium had no effect on dopamine-induced changes in effective renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate or osmolal clearance. Neither lithium nor dopamine influenced plasma concentrations of renin, aldosterone or atrial natriuretic peptide. 4. In conclusion, single test doses of lithium, as normally used in lithium clearance studies, increase baseline values of sodium clearance and effective renal plasma flow. Although these effects of lithium do not reduce the maximal renal responses to low-dose dopamine, they result in an underestimation of the percentage increase in sodium excretion.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (20) ◽  
pp. 2035-2043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios Dimopoulos ◽  
Katja Weisel ◽  
Niels W.C.J. van de Donk ◽  
Karthik Ramasamy ◽  
Barbara Gamberi ◽  
...  

Purpose Renal impairment (RI) limits treatment options in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we prospectively studied pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) in patients with RRMM and moderate or severe RI, including those receiving hemodialysis. Patients and Methods MM-013, a noncomparative, European phase II trial, enrolled three patient cohorts: moderate RI (cohort A; estimated glomerular filtration rate, 30 to < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2); severe RI (cohort B; estimated glomerular filtration rate, < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2); and severe RI that requires hemodialysis (cohort C). Patients received pomalidomide 4 mg/d on days 1 to 21 and LoDEX 20 or 40 mg once per week in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was overall response rate. Results Of 81 enrolled patients (33, 34, and 14 patients in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively), 13 were still receiving treatment at data cutoff (January 28, 2017). Overall response rates were 39.4%, 32.4%, and 14.3%, with a median duration of response of 14.7 months, 4.6 months, and not estimable, respectively. Of importance, 100%, 79.4%, and 78.6% of patients, respectively, achieved disease control. With a median follow-up of 8.6 months, median overall survival was 16.4 months, 11.8 months, and 5.2 months, respectively. Complete renal responses were observed only in cohort A (18.2%), and no patients in cohort C became hemodialysis independent. Grade 3 and 4 hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events and pomalidomide discontinuations as a result of treatment-emergent adverse events occurred more frequently in cohort C. Pomalidomide pharmacokinetics were comparable among the three renal cohorts. Conclusion Pomalidomide 4 mg/d plus LoDEX is efficacious in patients with RRMM with moderate or severe RI, including those who had more advanced disease and required hemodialysis. The safety profile was acceptable among the three groups, and no new safety signals were observed.


1994 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Persson ◽  
Gunnela Nordén ◽  
Ingvar Karlberg ◽  
Styrbjörn Friman

2003 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Hackstein ◽  
C. Wiegand ◽  
A. C. Langheinrich ◽  
W. S. Rau

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document