An exploration of genetic g: Hierarchical factor analysis of cognitive data from the western reserve twin project

Intelligence ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dasen Luo ◽  
Stephen A. Petrill ◽  
Lee A. Thompson
1985 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Martin ◽  
Stephen B. Dunbar

This study was concerned with the factorial validity of the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS). Previous research identified a strong general factor for this battery, which was taken as evidence of redundancy among the subtests. Hierarchical factor analysis was done with a subset of the standardization data to explore the presence of second-order group factors. The results supported the construct validity of the Language and Mathematics subscales, though a degree of factorial complexity was found in both. Verbal and Visual Information group factors were also identified. Extension of the ITBS general and group factors to subtests of the Cognitive Abilities Test supported the interpretations made of the various group factors.


1985 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 564-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen K. Reuter ◽  
James M. Schuerger ◽  
Fred H. Wallbrown

For a sample of 132 clients from a counseling psychology private practice, 16 PF primary scores were subjected to hierarchical factor analysis with resulting replication of Cattell's higher order factors at secondary and tertiary levels of analysis.


1974 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 430-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reginald L. Jones

The structure of attitudes toward the exceptional was investigated using hierarchical factor analysis. The subjects were 132 men and 132 women college students who completed a 78 item social distance questionnaire (6 interpersonal situation and 13 categories of exceptionality-nonexceptionality). The results revealed a general factor concerning attitudes toward the disabled. This factor represented a common core of attitudes which cut across categories of disability and interpersonal situation. The general facto was differentiated into attitudes toward the physically disabled (with certain special emphases), attitudes toward the psychologically disabled, and attitudes toward the mildly retarded-nonexceptional. The last named factor was particularly provocative, indicating that, except for the closest interpersonal relationships (marriage and acceptance as close kin by marriage), the mildly retarded shared in the same configuration of attitudes as are held toward the nonexceptional. Attitudes toward the gifted emerged as a separate factor, isolated in virtually all instances from those held toward the disabled.


2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Beauducel ◽  
Martin Kersting

Summary: Assessment of intelligence is often based on fluid (gf) and crystallized intelligence (gc), and - in the German-speaking countries - the Berlin Model of Intelligence Structure (BIS). As yet, however, the two approaches have not been systematically related to each other. The present study therefore aims to identify possible relationships between the approaches. We hypothesize that gf is related to “processing capacity” and “memory” in the BIS, whereas gc is related to “fluency” and “knowledge” and, to a lesser degree, to “processing capacity.” We also assume “processing speed” to be related to both gf and gc. All components of the BIS that are relevant to the present study were measured by means of the BIS-r-DGP test, which, together with “knowledge” scales, was administered to 9,520 persons in the context of personnel selection. The following results were obtained: First, the BIS was replicated by factor analysis of the BIS-r-DGP test. Second, “knowledge” was shown to form an additional component. Third, gf and gc emerged clearly from hierarchical factor analysis. Finally, with the exception of the relation of “fluency” to gc, all hypotheses were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document