Optimization of monolithic solid state array detectors for the position encoding of small angle X-ray scattering from synchrotron sources

1982 ◽  
Vol 201 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Borso
2009 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 355a ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey Struts ◽  
David P. Holland ◽  
Gabriel Longo ◽  
Matthew J. Justice ◽  
Igal Szleifer ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 36 (24) ◽  
pp. 9107-9114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Attila Domján ◽  
Gábor Erdödi ◽  
Manfred Wilhelm ◽  
Michael Neidhöfer ◽  
Katharina Landfester ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (11) ◽  
pp. 2094-2100 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Orts ◽  
David L. VanderHart ◽  
Terry L. Bluhm ◽  
Robert H. Marchessault

Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and solid state CPMAS l3C NMR were used to describe the crystalline morphology of a series of bacterially produced poly(β-hydroxybutyrate-co-β-hydroxyvalerate) copolymers containing random distributions of 3-hydroxybutyrate (3HB) and 3-hydroxyvalerate (3HV). Modeling of SAXS results showed that the morphology of this isodimorphic system is better described by two phases, crystalline and amorphous, having defects within each domain. This is in contrast to a model with a large interfacial region between phases. For the 3HV composition range 0–27 mol%, the polymer crystallizes in a poly(β-hydroxybutyrate)-type crystalline lattice. Solid state NMR results showed that there is significant incorporation of the 3HV minor component into the poly(β-hydroxybutyrate) crystalline phase over this composition range. The ratio of the 3HV content in the crystalline phase relative to the overall 3HV content is not linear, but increases with increasing 3HV. For the 21 and 27% 3HV samples, the 3HV content in the crystalline phase is as much as 2/3 of the overall 3HV content. Inclusion of 3HV is correlated to an increase in crystalline disorder (as measured by SAXS), implying that it is easier to accommodate the bulkier 3HV comonomer into a crystalline region that already contains defects. Keywords: bacterial polyesters, poly(3-hydroxyalkanates), small-angle X-ray scattering, solid state NMR, cocrystallization.


2003 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 1147-1156 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. L. Wouters ◽  
V. M. Litvinov ◽  
F. L. Binsbergen ◽  
J. G. P. Goossens ◽  
M. van Duin ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 282a ◽  
Author(s):  
K.J. Mallikarjunaiah ◽  
Avigdor Leftin ◽  
Jacob J. Kinnun ◽  
Matthew J. Justice ◽  
Adriana L. Rogozea ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 605-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Nakase ◽  
Toshio Kato ◽  
Osamu Yoda ◽  
Isamu Kuriyama ◽  
Akira Odajima

1994 ◽  
Vol 376 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Londono ◽  
G. D. Wignall ◽  
R. G. Alamo ◽  
L. Mandelkern ◽  
J. S.Lin

ABSTRACTThe solid-state morphology and liquid-state homogeneity of blends of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) were investigated by small-angle neutron and x-ray scattering (SANS and SAXS). The solid state morphology was investigated as a function of composition and cooling rate from the melt. After slow cooling, the evidence indicated that the mixtures were either completely (HDPE-rich blends) or almost completely (LDPE-rich blends) phase separated into separate HDPE and LDPE lamellae over the whole compositional range. In contrast, for rapidly quenched blends the components are extensively co-crystallized for all concentrations, though the SANS data indicated that the branched component had a tendency to be preferentially located in the inter-lamellar regions. In the liquid state, the blends were homogenous at all compositions, showing that the solid state morphology is not determined by the melt structure, but is a function of the crystallization kinetics. Further evidence for blend homogeneity in the liquid is presented. In particular we examine the hypothesis that a phase separated mixture might give a scattering pattern similar to a homogenous blend if the domain sizes were larger that the maximum spatial resolution of the SANS experiment (D > 2π/Qmin ~ 2000Å). In this scenario, the differential scattering cross section dΣ/dΩ(Q) ~ Q-2, though phase separation decreases the cross section in this Q-range with respect to the homogenous blend. For HDPE/LDPE blends in the melt, this decrease in intensity was not observed, thus ruling out the possibility of phase separation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document