Fractures of the Phalanges: Results of Internal Fixation Using 1.5mm and 2mm A. O. Screws

1987 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
D. J. FORD ◽  
S. EL-HADIDI ◽  
P. G. LUNN ◽  
F. D. BURKE
Keyword(s):  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Active Movement ◽  
Flexion Deformity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Condylar Fractures ◽  
Phalangeal Fractures ◽  
Mean Time

Thirty-six patients were treated for 38 phalangeal fractures using 1.5 mm and 2 mm A. O. screws. Plates were not used in the fingers. Oblique fractures of the condyles, shafts or bases of the proximal or middle phalanges were treated by internal fixation because of instability, displacement or rotation. 40% of fractures had associated skin wounds, were comminuted or had damage to the extensor mechanism. The mean duration of post-operative immobilization was 9 days and the mean time off work was 6 weeks. Total active movement in the involved ray was 220 degrees or greater in 24 cases, 180 degrees to 215 degrees in eight cases, and less than 180 degrees in two patients at follow up. The patients were reviewed between three and 54 months after treatment and the mean duration of follow up was 24 months. The most frequent complication was 10 degrees to 30 degrees of flexion deformity of the proximal interphalangeal joint after internal fixation of condylar fractures. Results were satisfactory in 90% of cases.

Treatment of fracture subluxations of the proximal interphalangeal joint using a ligamentotaxis device: a multidisciplinary approach

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 825-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. MacFarlane ◽  
S. Gillespie ◽  
F. Cashin ◽  
A. Mahmood ◽  
G. Cheung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Postoperative Rehabilitation ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Joint Range ◽  
Mean Time

Complex fracture subluxations of the proximal interphalangeal joint are often difficult to treat and their outcome variable. A number of methods for treatment of these injuries have been described. We have used a ligamentotaxis device ( Ligamentotaxor, Arex, Palaiseau Cedex, France) since 2008. We performed 28 operations in 28 patients with complex proximal interphalangeal joint injuries over a 3-year period. Patients followed a standardized postoperative rehabilitation regime, including fixator adjustment as necessary. The mean age was 33 years (range 18–67). The mean time to surgery was 7 days. At final follow-up (mean 22 months, range 6–52) the mean proximal interphalangeal joint range of motion was 85° (range 60°–110°). The mean QuickDASH functional outcome score was 4.8 (range 0–36.4). Our results compare favourably with other devices reported in the literature.

Chronic Flexion Contracture of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Treated with the Compass Hinge External Fixator. A Consecutive Series of 27 Cases

2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. HOUSHIAN ◽  
B. GYNNING ◽  
H. A. SCHRØDER
Keyword(s):  
External Fixator ◽  
Flexion Contracture ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Pin Track ◽  
Mean Time

Twenty-seven chronic flexion contractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint were treated with the Compass® hinge external fixator without open surgery. The fixator was removed after a mean of 33 (range, 14–68) days. The mean time from injury to operation was 4 (range, 1–19) years and all patients were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 21 (range, 12–50) months. The mean extension gain was 38° (range, 0–70°), and the mean flexion–extension arc improved by 42° (range, 0–80°). Complications included superficial pin-track infection in 11 cases and pin loosening in four cases.

Results of Treatment of Chronic Dorsal Fracture-Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joints of the Fingers

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 798-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. ISHIDA ◽  
Y. IKUTA
Keyword(s):  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Results Of Treatment ◽  
Palmar Plate ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

We reviewed 20 cases of chronic dorsal fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint, with a mean follow-up period of 74 months. In patients without comminuted palmar fragments, open reduction and internal fixation or osteotomy of the malunited fragment provided good results. In treating patients with damaged articular cartilage or with comminuted palmar fragments by palmar plate arthroplasty, poor results were obtained because of secondary osteoarthritic changes.

Proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty with silicone implants (NeuFlex) by a lateral approach: a series of 51 cases

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Merle ◽  
F. Villani ◽  
B. Lallemand ◽  
L. Vaienti
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Silicone Implants ◽  
Lateral Stability ◽  
Degenerative Osteoarthritis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Quick Dash

The aim of this study is to assess outcomes of a lateral surgical approach for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty with NeuFlex® silicone implants for primary degenerative osteoarthritis. We reviewed 51 arthroplasties performed on 43 patients. The mean follow up period was 36 months (range 18–42). The average preoperative range of motion (ROM) was 38°. The average postoperative ROM was 63°. In 21/51 (41%) cases, there was an average axial deviation of 17° (range 10–30°). VAS and Quick DASH scores improved. In 5/51 (10%) cases, further surgery was required. Our lateral approach seems to be effective and minimally invasive, providing adequate exposure. Contralateral incision and contralateral ligament reinforcement should be performed, whenever necessary, to improve lateral stability.

Treatment of unstable proximal interphalangeal joint fractures with hemi-hamate osteochondral autografts

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Burnier ◽  
T. Awada ◽  
F. Marin Braun ◽  
P. Rostoucher ◽  
M. Ninou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Articular Surface ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Pinch Strength ◽  
Middle Phalanx ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Active Flexion ◽  
The Mean

The primary aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological results after hemi-hamate resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with acute or chronic unstable fractures of the base of the middle phalanx and to describe technical features that can facilitate the surgical procedure. Hemi-hamate arthroplasties were done in 19 patients (mean age 39 years) with an isolated fracture at the base of the middle phalanx that involved more than 40% of the articular surface. We assessed ten chronic cases (treated >6 weeks after fracture) and nine acute ones (<6 weeks) at a mean of 24 months. Pain scores, QuickDASH scores, grip strengths, range of motion and radiological findings were recorded at follow-up. At follow-up, the mean active flexion at the proximal interphalangeal joint was to 83° with a mean fixed flexion of 17° (active range of motion 66°). The mean active distal interphalangeal motion was 41°. The mean visual analogue scale score was 1.1. The mean QuickDASH score was 11. The mean pinch strength was 82% of the opposite side. Radiographs revealed one partial graft lysis. Level of evidence: IV

MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: minimum 2-year follow-up

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 910-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Flannery ◽  
O. Harley ◽  
R. Badge ◽  
A. Birch ◽  
D. Nuttall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Cobalt Chromium ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Replacement Arthroplasty ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
The Mean

The MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal replacement is a cementless cobalt–chromium metal-on-polyethylene mobile-bearing surface replacement arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to report the outcome and complications of this implant at a minimum of 2 years follow-up from a single institution. A retrospective case review was performed on all MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint replacements performed with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patient demographics, diagnosis, implant revision and other surgical interventions were recorded. Subjective and objective outcomes were evaluated at latest follow-up, including pain scores, range of motion, function and radiographic assessment. A total of 109 implants were inserted in 56 patients. Nine implants (six patients) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 100 implants, 75 had been undertaken in females. The mean age at time of surgery was 64 years and the principal diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 74%. The mean follow-up was 47 months (range 24–77). Within the group there was a statistically significant diminution in pain. There was also an improvement in functional scores post-operatively. Improvement in range of motion was seen in those joints with a pre-operative range of motion greater than 20°. Radiologically there was no evidence of loosening or of implant subsidence at final follow-up. The revision rate was 13%. Nine joints were revised to the NeuFlex (silicone rubber) prosthesis, three were converted to an arthrodesis and one had exchange of the MatOrtho prosthesis. The survival of the MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty was 85% at a minimum of 2-years follow-up. Patients can be advised that the procedure achieves good pain relief, improvement in functional scores and may improve range of motion. We would, however, caution against this implant’s use in joints that are either stiff or have significant deformity and/or instability pre-operatively.

The use of dynamic external fixation in the treatment of dorsal fracture subluxations and pilon fractures of finger proximal interphalangeal joints

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Abou Elatta ◽  
F. Assal ◽  
H. M. Basheer ◽  
A. F. El Morshidy ◽  
S. M. Elglaind ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Motion ◽  
Stable Fixation ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Finger Motion ◽  
Pilon Fractures

The aim of this study was to review the outcome of the treatment of finger proximal interphalangeal joint dorsal fracture subluxations and pilon fractures with a modified external fixator. We treated 36 patients (36 fingers). We assessed the ranges of motion and patient satisfaction. At final follow-up, 23 patients had no pain; 11 had pain in the cold; and two also had mild pain. None had moderate or severe pain. The mean range of proximal interphalangeal joint motion was 86° (60°–100°). The mean total active range of finger motion was 244° (range 200°–265°). This system is simple, cheap and relatively easily applied. It gives stable fixation that allows early mobilization. Level of evidence: IV

Reconstruction of finger pulp defects using homodigital dorsal middle phalangeal neurovascular advancement flap

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Özaksar ◽  
T. Toros ◽  
T. S. Sügün ◽  
E. Bal ◽  
Y. Ademoğlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advancement Flap ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Discrimination Test ◽  
Extension Deficit ◽  
Flap Procedure ◽  
Neurovascular Pedicle ◽  
The Mean

Eighteen finger pulp defects were reconstructed using a homodigital dorsal middle phalangeal neurovascular island flap procedure based on a single neurovascular pedicle preserving the length of the finger. All flaps survived and achieved adequate functional and cosmetic results. The mean follow-up time was 22 months. The mean value of static two-point discrimination test of the healed flaps was 7 mm and the mean value of moving two-point discrimination test was 5 mm. Range of motion was considered satisfactory in all reconstructed fingers except one, in which a 20° extension deficit at the proximal interphalangeal joint was observed. This flap represents a useful alternative for reconstruction of the fingers with large pulp defects.

Trigger Finger Treatment by Ulnar Superficialis Slip Resection (U.S.S.R.)

2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 368-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. LE VIET ◽  
I. TSIONOS ◽  
M. BOULOUEDNINE ◽  
D. HANNOUCHE
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Trigger Finger ◽  
Flexion Deformity ◽  
Full Extension ◽  
History Of ◽  
Flexor Digitorum ◽  
Fixed Flexion Deformity ◽  
A1 Pulley

Surgical release of the A1 pulley for treatment of trigger finger normally produces excellent results. However, in patients with long-standing disease, there may be a persistent fixed flexion deformity of the proximal interphalangeal joint. This is sometimes due to a degenerative thickening of the flexor tendons and may be treated by resection of the ulnar slip of flexor digitorum superficialis tendon. One hundred seventy-two patients (228 fingers) who had undergone this procedure were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 66 months. Mean pre-operative fixed flexion deformity of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 33°. All but eight fingers were improved by surgery and there was an average gain of 26° in passive extension (7° residual fixed flexion deformity) of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Full extension was attained in 141 of the 228 fingers, and in all 101 fingers with a pre-operative loss of passive extension of 30° or less. This technique is indicated for patients with loss of passive extension in the proximal interphalangeal joint and a long history of triggering.

Comparison of outcomes of three surgical approaches for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty using a surface-replacing implant

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 608-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elvira Bodmer ◽  
Miriam Marks ◽  
Stefanie Hensler ◽  
Stephan Schindele ◽  
Daniel B. Herren
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Joint Motion ◽  
Extension Deficit ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Volar Approach ◽  
The Mean

The objective was to compare outcomes of the volar, Chamay and tendon splitting approaches for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty using a surface-replacing implant (CapFlex-PIP). One-hundred prospectively documented patients with a 2-year follow-up were included. Range of proximal interphalangeal joint motion, the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and complications were analysed. Between baseline and follow-up, mean proximal interphalangeal joint motion increased for the volar (53° to 54°), Chamay (38° to 53°) and tendon splitting (40° to 61°) approaches. The volar approach yielded the greatest flexion and the highest extension deficit. The mean brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores at baseline and 2 years were 45 and 74 (volar), 45 and 66 (Chamay) and 41 and 75 (tendon splitting). Seven patients in the Chamay group and two in the volar group required a reoperation consisting of teno-/arthrolysis. The tendon splitting approach tended to result in the best outcomes that were associated with fewer complications compared with the volar and Chamay approaches. Level of evidence: IV

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document