Is the amplitude of the ventricular fibrillation (vf) wave a good predictor of the success of the electrical defibrillation

Resuscitation ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
P.H. Robert ◽  
L. De Myttenaere ◽  
E. Makhoul ◽  
D. Verset ◽  
E. Beaucarne ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 244-247
Author(s):  
Zhao Heng Lin

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of low-energy direct current defibrillation combined with intravenous application of β-receptor blocker in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia storm (VTS). METHODS: A total of 59 patients with VTS were randomly divided into two groups. In the control group (n = 31), intravenous administration of Lidocaine or Amiodarone and routine electrical defibrillation were performed. In the esmolol group (n = 28), intravenous administration of esmolol and low-energy electrical defibrillation were performed in addition to the same drug treatment as the control group.RESULTS: The success rate of terminating recurrent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation was significantly higher in the esmolol group than in the control group (89.71% vs. 39.89%, P < 0.05). The necessary discharge times and average discharge energy to terminate ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were significantly decreased in the esmolol group compared with control (5.69 ± 1.34 times vs. 8.63 ± 3.79 times, 95.32 ± 13.21J vs. 185.39 ± 25.63J, both P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension (45.16% vs. 39.29%), sinus bradycardia (3.23% vs. 3.57%), and junctional/ventricular escape (38.71% vs. 39.29%) between the esmolol and control groups (all P > 0.05). The mortality was significantly lower in the esmolol group than in the control group (21.43%, 6/28 vs. 77.42%, 24/31, P < 0.01).CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional treatment, intravenous administration of a β-receptor blocker combined with low-energy electrical defibrillation could be a safe and effective therapy to treat VTS.


1998 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 2183-2192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian E. Zaugg ◽  
Shao T. Wu ◽  
Vania Barbosa ◽  
Peter T. Buser ◽  
Joan Wikman-Coffelt ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUJI MURAKAWA ◽  
TAKESHI YAMASHITA ◽  
YUKIHIRO KANESE ◽  
KAZUNORI SEZAKI ◽  
MASAO OMATA

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 2022-2028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julieta Kolarova ◽  
Iyad M. Ayoub ◽  
Zhong Yi ◽  
Raúl J. Gazmuri

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Yilmaz ◽  
Ufuk Aydin ◽  
Zehra Ipek Arslan ◽  
Canan Balcı ◽  
Cevdet Ugur Kocogullari ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> Ventricular fibrillation is common after aortic declamping in patients undergoing open heart surgery. This situation has a negative impact on morbidity and mortality. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the effect of administering lidocaine versus amiodarone before aortic declamping during elective coronary bypass grafting, paying close attention to when the initial effect of amiodarone sets in.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> In this double blind, prospective, randomized, controlled study, 86 patients who were candidates for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were recruited into three groups: group lidocaine (group L, n = 29); group amiodarone (group A, n = 27); and group placebo (group P, n = 30). Group L patients received 1.5 mg/kg of lidocaine 2 minutes before aortic declamping and group A patients received 300 mg of amiodarone intravenously 15 minutes before release of the aortic cross clamp. The primary endpoints were the incidence of ventricular fibrillation and the number of shocks required to terminate ventricular fibrillation.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> The frequency of ventricular fibrillation occurrence was significantly higher in group P (70%) when compared with group A (37%) and group L (38%) (<em>P</em> = .017). There was no statistically significant difference between the amiodarone and the lidocaine groups regarding ventricular fibrillation. However, when ventricular fibrillation occurred, the percentage of patients requiring electrical defibrillation was significantly higher in both group L and group P when compared with group A (<em>P</em> = .023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> We suggest that during coronary arterial bypass surgery, administration of an amiodarone regime before release of the aortic cross clamp, paying particular attention to the start of the initial effect of amiodarone, is no more effective than lidocaine for prevention from arrhythmia; however, amiodarone reduces the need for electrical defibrillation.</p>


Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith A Marill ◽  
David D Salcido ◽  
Matthew L Sundermann ◽  
Allison C Koller ◽  
James J Menegazzi

Introduction: We previously found potassium cardioplegia followed by rapid calcium reversal (K plegia) can achieve defibrillation in a swine model of electrical phase ventricular fibrillation (VF) comparable to standard care. Hypothesis: Exploring 3 possible potassium (K) dose and timing protocols, we hypothesize K plegia may benefit resuscitation of circulatory phase VF. Methods: Three separate blinded randomized placebo-controlled trials were performed with electrically-induced VF untreated for durations of 6,9, and 12 minutes in a swine model. All experimental groups received infusion of 1 or 2 boluses of intravenous (IV) K followed by a single calcium reversal bolus. Only K was replaced by saline in the control groups. All other treatments were the same. Outcomes included: amplitude spectrum area (AMSA) during VF, resulting rhythms, number of defibrillations, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and hemodynamics for 1 hour post ROSC. Single nominal and interval outcomes were compared with Fisher’s Exact test and Mann-Whitney U, respectively. Results: Twelve, 12, and 8 animals were included at 6, 9 , and 12 minute VF durations for a total of 32. ROSC, average number of shocks, and post-ROSC norepinephrine requirement are listed below. 4/6 K plegia and 2/6 control animals achieved ROSC in the 9 minute protocol, (p=0.24). Two of 8 animals that achieved ROSC with K plegia did so without electrical defibrillation. Conclusions: The majority of animals achieved ROSC after up to 9 minutes of untreated VF arrest using K plegia protocols. K plegia requires further optimization for both peripheral IV and intraosseous infusion, and to assess for superiority over standard care.


2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 2395-2397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raúl J. Gazmuri ◽  
Iyad M. Ayoub ◽  
Shidrokh A. Shakeri

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document