MMPI and headache: a special focus on differential diagnosis, prediction of treatment outcome, and patient—Treatment matching

Pain ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald E. Williams ◽  
Kevin J. Thompson ◽  
Joel D. Haber ◽  
James M. Raczynski
Author(s):  
Arcangelo Picciariello ◽  
Petr Tsarkov ◽  
Vincenzo Papagni ◽  
Sergey Efetov ◽  
Daniel Markaryan ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a benign condition affecting a considerable part of adult population. HD can be considered a social and economic burden with high impact on patient lifestyle. Several new techniques and devices have been proposed for HD treatment; however, preoperative assessment is essential and the use of classification system is recommended. METHODS: In the last two decades many studies described the preoperative assessment and several attempts of classification for HD. This review focuses on the most relevant studies found in literature where classification systems and clinical evaluation with differential diagnosis have been evaluated. RESULTS: The knowledge of classification systems and differential diagnosis for HD has been shown to play a central role in the clinical assessment and in the best treatment choice. Although there are new challenging techniques and devices for HD treatment, a preoperative assessment is always mandatory. CONCLUSION: Preoperative clinical evaluation is essential for HD patient treatment and outcome. Classification systems are useful for the therapeutic choice and for researches on new medical or surgical treatments. In fact, the international guidelines advise several therapeutic options depending on the severity of the HD.


1991 ◽  
Vol 16 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 63-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damaris J. Rohsenow ◽  
Peter M. Monti ◽  
Jody A. Binkoff ◽  
Michael R. Liepman ◽  
Ted D. Nirenberg ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 243-257
Author(s):  
Fabiana Perrone ◽  
Maurizio Balbi ◽  
Chiara Casartelli ◽  
Sebastiano Buti ◽  
Gianluca Milanese ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 75-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Ooteman ◽  
Roel Verheul ◽  
Mickaël Naassila ◽  
Martine Daoust ◽  
Gerard M. Schippers ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 161 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Chick ◽  
Kevin Gough ◽  
Wojciech Falkowski ◽  
Peter Kershaw ◽  
Brian Hore ◽  
...  

To assess the efficacy of supervised disulfiram as an adjunct to out-patient treatment of alcoholics, a randomised, partially blind, six-month follow-up study was conducted in which 126 patients received 200 mg disulfiram or 100 mg vitamin C under the supervision of a nominated informant. In the opinion of the (blinded) independent assessor, patients on disulfiram increased average total abstinent days by 100 and patients on vitamin C by 69, thus enhancing by one-third this measure of treatment outcome. Mean weekly alcohol consumption was reduced by 162 units with disulfiram, compared with 105 units with vitamin C., and the disulfiram patients reduced their total six-month alcohol consumption by 2572 units compared with an average reduction of 1448 units in the vitamin C group. Serum gamma-GT showed a mean fall of 21 IU/I in patients on disulfiram but rose by a mean of 13 IU/I with vitamin C. Unwanted effects in the disulfiram group led to a dose reduction in seven patients and to treatment withdrawal in four (and in one vitamin C patient). Two-thirds of the disulfiram group asked to continue the treatment at the end of the study. There were no medically serious adverse reactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document