A microminiature electromagnetic middle-ear implant hearing device

We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of a series of 31 consecutively presenting patients who had been implanted with the Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear hearing device. All implantations had been performed by the senior author. Three of these patients had undergone bilateral implantation, and 4 others had undergone subsequent explantation and reimplantation in response to known or suspected device failure, giving us a total of 34 ears and 38 implants. Our goal was to ascertain short- and long-term outcomes as measured by conventional audiometry (pure-tone average at 1 to 6 kHz) and long-term benefit as defined by the use or nonuse of the device. We found that at the initial activation session 2 months postoperatively, the average hearing thresholds were within 3 dB of the preoperative thresholds in all 34 ears and all 38 implants. The mean short-term gain at activation in the 38 implants was 28.1 dB. Nineteen patients (20 ears) were available for long-term evaluation, with the length of follow-up ranging from less than 1 year to 11 years (mean: 7.3). Of these 20 ears, 9 demonstrated further gain (mean: 10.8 dB) despite any natural hearing deterioration; of the remaining 11 ears, gain was unchanged in 2, diminished in 7 (mean: −3.6 dB), and gain data were unavailable in 2. In the final analysis, there were 20 user ears and 10 nonuser ears; 4 ears were lost to all follow-up. We conclude that direct-drive hearing with the Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear hearing device is beneficial and provides sustained audiometric gain. Factors that have a significant impact on patient use or nonuse include difficulty in obtaining audiologic support and the direct and indirect costs of the device. Without audiologic or financial support, some patients may choose to become nonusers and to either switch to conventional hearing aid amplification or become apathetic about hearing improvement.

Download Full-text

Semi-implantable Middle Ear Electromagnetic Hearing Device for Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Ear Nose & Throat Journal ◽

10.1177/014556139707600510 ◽

1997 ◽

Vol 76 (5) ◽

pp. 333-341 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Anthony J. Maniglia ◽

Wen H. Ko ◽

Steven L. Garverick ◽

Hassan Abbass ◽

Michael Kane ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hearing Loss ◽

Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽

Middle Ear ◽

Subjective Evaluation ◽

The Body ◽

Sensorineural Hearing ◽

Rf Amplifier ◽

Audio Amplifier ◽

Receiving Antenna ◽

Hearing Device

A semi-implantable middle ear electromagnetic hearing device (SIMEHD) is proposed for limited clinical trial in adult patients to evaluate the implantable hearing device for moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational device exemption (IDE) approval has been granted (May 1996) for clinical trials. The implant unit has been evaluated acutely and chronically in animals (cats) with excellent results. Five cats undergoing chronic implantation were allowed to survive an average of 9.6 months, showing that the SIMEHD is biocompatible, functional and without untoward complications. All implant units recovered from the cats were functional, except for wire breakage of the internal antenna. A new antenna was redesigned for human implantation. The SIMEHD system consists of an external and internal unit. The external unit consists of a microphone, audio amplifier, modulator, radio frequency (RF) amplifier, antenna and battery. The internal unit is composed of a receiving antenna, hybrid electronic circuit, air core driving coil, and a target magnet cemented to the incus. All materials in contact with the body are biocompatible and expected to survive indefinitely. The implant unit is miniaturized and manufactured with existing fabrication technology by our industrial collaborator, Wilson Greatbatch, Ltd. The specific aims and major tasks of the proposed research are: a) to evaluate reliability, safety and efficacy of the SIMEHD system in a selected group of patients diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss, due mainly to presbycusis or aging of the inner ear; and b) to obtain objective and subjective evaluation of audiologic and psychoacoustic performance as compared to the acoustic hearing aid. This paper describes the design, illustrates the actual device (newest prototype) and details the technique for surgical implantation in the attic and mastoid antrum in humans.

Download Full-text