Sociotechnical communication in an underground mine fire: a study of warning messages during an emergency evacuation

1993 ◽  
Vol 16 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 709-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Launa Mallett ◽  
Charles Vaught ◽  
Michael J. Brnich
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 320-326
Author(s):  
Cuiping Li ◽  
Lei Hu ◽  
Zhongxue Li ◽  
Zhiguo Cao
Keyword(s):  

1984 ◽  
Author(s):  
J P L Bacharach ◽  
A L Craven ◽  
D B Stewart

CIM Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-130
Author(s):  
R. A. Alvarez ◽  
J. D. Stinnette ◽  
J. E. Carrasco

1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
J P L Bacharach ◽  
A L Craven ◽  
D B Stewart

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 406-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihong Zhou ◽  
Liming Yuan ◽  
Davood Bahrami ◽  
Richard A Thomas ◽  
James H Rowland

The primary danger with underground mine fires is carbon monoxide poisoning. A good knowledge of smoke and carbon monoxide movement in an underground mine during a fire is of importance for the design of ventilation systems, emergency response, and miners’ escape and rescue. Mine fire simulation software packages have been widely used to predict carbon monoxide concentration and its spread in a mine for effective mine fire emergency planning. However, they are not highly recommended to be used to forecast the actual carbon monoxide concentration due to lack of validation studies. In this article, MFIRE, a mine fire simulation software based on ventilation networks, was evaluated for its carbon monoxide spread prediction capabilities using experimental results from large-scale diesel fuel and conveyor belt fire tests conducted in the Safety Research Coal Mine at The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The comparison between the simulation and test results of carbon monoxide concentration shows good agreement and indicates that MFIRE is able to predict the carbon monoxide spread in underground mine fires with confidence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document