scholarly journals Virtual testing of impact in fiber reinforced laminates

Author(s):  
S. Sádaba ◽  
F. Martínez-Hergueta ◽  
C.S. Lopes ◽  
C. Gonzalez ◽  
J. LLorca
2013 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 63-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Catalanotti ◽  
P.P. Camanho ◽  
A.T. Marques

2019 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Liu ◽  
H. P. Lee ◽  
K. S. Lai ◽  
V. B. C. Tan

Abstract Helicoidal laminates mimicking the laminar structure of the exoskeleton of crustaceans have been reported to resist higher out-of-plane loads than the common cross-ply and quasi-isotropic fiber-reinforced laminates. Some have reported that smaller inter-ply angle improves strength of helicoidal laminates but others have reported the opposite. A few important material parameters that dictate the failure mechanism of helicoidal laminates have recently been proposed based on proof-of-concept carbon fiber-reinforced laminates, which is not the best material system to benefit from a helicoidal configuration. This study investigates the out-of-plane loading performance of helicoidal laminates with various inter-ply angles, ply thicknesses, and materials. Result shows that the failure mechanism is dictated by the competition between spiraling matrix split and delamination followed by fiber breakage regardless of the laminate material system. Spiraling matrix split resistance decreases as pitch (ratio of inter-ply angle to ply thickness) and matrix toughness decreases. This study provides guidelines for the optimization of helicoidal laminates. Coexistence of spiraling matrix split and fiber damage is often seen on the failed laminate with the highest peak load. The optimal inter-ply angle provides the optimal spiraling matrix split resistance; so, neither spiraling matrix split nor fiber/delamination damage becomes dominant. Since resistance to spiraling matrix split decreases as pitch or matrix toughness decreases, the optimal inter-ply angle will increase for laminates with weaker matrix or thicker plies and vice versa.


2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 1855-1866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zicheng Liu ◽  
Changyou Li ◽  
Dominique Lesselier ◽  
Yu Zhong

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document