Cytoskeletal Disruption as a Biomarker of Developmental Neurotoxicity

2019 ◽  
pp. 1033-1046
Author(s):  
Alan J. Hargreaves ◽  
Magdalini Sachana ◽  
John Flaskos
2008 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. S47
Author(s):  
Didima De Groot ◽  
Nadine Jetten ◽  
Bart Voet ◽  
Andre Wolterbeek ◽  
Andor Veltien ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 218 ◽  
pp. 112308
Author(s):  
Siyu Xia ◽  
Xinhong Zhu ◽  
Yuepei Yan ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
Guoliang Chen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (15) ◽  
pp. 7929
Author(s):  
Megan Chesnut ◽  
Thomas Hartung ◽  
Helena Hogberg ◽  
David Pamies

Neurodevelopment is uniquely sensitive to toxic insults and there are concerns that environmental chemicals are contributing to widespread subclinical developmental neurotoxicity (DNT). Increased DNT evaluation is needed due to the lack of such information for most chemicals in common use, but in vivo studies recommended in regulatory guidelines are not practical for the large-scale screening of potential DNT chemicals. It is widely acknowledged that developmental neurotoxicity is a consequence of disruptions to basic processes in neurodevelopment and that testing strategies using human cell-based in vitro systems that mimic these processes could aid in prioritizing chemicals with DNT potential. Myelination is a fundamental process in neurodevelopment that should be included in a DNT testing strategy, but there are very few in vitro models of myelination. Thus, there is a need to establish an in vitro myelination assay for DNT. Here, we summarize the routes of myelin toxicity and the known models to study this particular endpoint.


Author(s):  
Anne Schmitz ◽  
Silke Dempewolf ◽  
Saime Tan ◽  
Gerd Bicker ◽  
Michael Stern

AbstractPesticide exposure during in utero and early postnatal development can cause a wide range of neurological defects. However, relatively few insecticides have been recognized as developmental neurotoxicants, so far. Recently, discovery of the insecticide, fipronil, in chicken eggs has raised public concern. The status of fipronil as a potential developmental neurotoxicant is still under debate. Whereas several in vivo and in vitro studies suggest specific toxicity, other in vitro studies could not confirm this concern. Here, we tested fipronil and its main metabolic product, fipronil sulfone both at concentrations between 1.98 and 62.5 µM, alongside with the established developmental neurotoxicant, rotenone (0.004–10 µM) in vitro on the human neuronal precursor cell line NT2. We found that rotenone impaired all three tested DNT endpoints, neurite outgrowth, neuronal differentiation, and precursor cell migration in a dose-dependent manner and clearly separable from general cytotoxicity in the nanomolar range. Fipronil and fipronil sulfone specifically inhibited cell migration and neuronal differentiation, but not neurite outgrowth in the micromolar range. The rho-kinase inhibitor Y-27632 counteracted inhibition of migration for all three compounds (EC50 between 12 and 50 µM). The antioxidant, n-acetyl cysteine, could ameliorate the inhibitory effects of fipronil on all three tested endpoints (EC 50 between 84 and 164 µM), indicating the involvement of oxidative stress. Fipronil sulfone had a stronger effect than fipronil, confirming the importance to test metabolic products alongside original pesticides. We conclude that in vitro fipronil and fipronil sulfone display specific developmental neurotoxicity on developing human model neurons.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112236
Author(s):  
Ashley Roberts ◽  
Andrew G. Renwick ◽  
Diane Stannard ◽  
David Myers ◽  
George Pugh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document