Regeneration and replacement of endothelial cells and renal vascular repair

2022 ◽  
pp. 129-144
Author(s):  
David P. Basile ◽  
Mervin C. Yoder
RSC Advances ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 13848-13854
Author(s):  
Yan Liu ◽  
Wenshuai Deng ◽  
Liangliang Yang ◽  
Xiuxiu Fu ◽  
Zhibin Wang ◽  
...  

This study offers a new in vitro system to understand the interplay between HUVEC monolayer and monocytes mediated by aligned topographies, which may be useful for vascular repair and disease modeling for drug testing.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 693-693
Author(s):  
Katherine L. Hill ◽  
Petra Obrtlikova ◽  
Diego F Alvarez ◽  
Judy A King ◽  
Qinglu Li ◽  
...  

Abstract The field of vascular regenerative medicine is rapidly growing and the demand for cell-based therapy is high. In our studies, human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) were differentiated via coculture with M2-10B4 mouse bone marrow derived stromal cells for 13–15 days. At this time, CD34+ were isolated using an immunomagnetic separation technique and further phenotyped. As shown by flow cytometric analysis, the population co-expressed typical endothelial cell surface antigens such as CD31 and Flk. Upon culture of these CD34+ cells in endothelial culture medium containing VEGF, bFGF, IGF-1, EGF, and heparin, the cells assumed a endothelial cell morphology, formed vascular like networks when placed in Matrigel, and expressed CD31, Flk1, CD146, Tie2, eNOS, vWF, and VE-cadherin (each confirmed by quantitative real time PCR, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry). Transmission electron micrograph images of these cells, termed hESC-ECs, showed a defined cortical filamentous rim as seen in other endothelial cells and a significant number of micro-particles being released from the cell surface. Additionally, permeability studies revealed these cells exhibit trans-electrical resistance of 1200Ω, consistent with basal barrier properties exhibited by conduit endothelial cells. These hESC-ECs also proved capable of further differentiation into smooth muscle cells, hESCSMCs. When culture conditions were changed to support SMC growth (DMEM + PDGFBB and TGF-β1), cells assumed SMC morphology including intracellular fibrils, down regulated endothelial gene transcript and protein expression, and began to express α-SMC actin, calponin, SM22, smoothelin, myocardin. Also, concomitant increases in expression of APEG-1 and CRP2/SmLIM, expressed preferentially by arterial SMCs, was found. In contrast, HUVECs placed under these SMC conditions did not display SMC characteristics. Additional studies evaluated intracellular calcium release in hESC-ECs and hESC-SMCs subjected to various pharmacological agonists. The hESC-SMC population preferentially responded to bradykinin, oxytocin, endothelin-1, histamine, and ATP, while hESC-ECs responsed to endothelin-1, histamine, bradykinin, and carbachol. Functional studies were initially done by in vitro culture of these cell populations in Matrigel. hESC-SMCs placed in Matrigel alone did not form a vascular like network. However, an improved vascular structure was seen when hESC-ECs were placed in Matrigel along with hESC-SMCs. Together, these cells formed a dense, more robust vascular network composed of thicker tube structures, indicating a more physiologically relevant model of vasculogenesis. Next in vivo studies have been initiated utilizing a mouse myocardial infarct model. NOD/SCID mice were anesthetized and subjected to ligation of the left anterior descending artery. By assessing cardiac function 3 weeks post infarction, we found that mice receiving an hESC-EC injection (1×106 cells directly into infarction sight) showed greater vascular repair and increased ejection fraction when compared to mice that did not receive an hESCEC injection [untreated control ejection fraction= 14.3% vs hESC-EC treated= 21.3%]. Currently, studies are underway evaluating combined use of hESC-ECs and hESC-SMCs in this infarct model, as we hypothesize that combined use of these cells will be more beneficial for vascular development and repair than either one population alone. Together, the phenotypic and functional studies of these hESC-derived CD34+ cells suggest these cells can act as pericytes with dual endothelial cell and SMC developmental potential and these hESC-derived pericytes can provide an important resource for developing novel cellular therapies for vascular repair.


2007 ◽  
Vol 293 (2) ◽  
pp. F624-F630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten B. Rookmaaker ◽  
Marianne C. Verhaar ◽  
Hetty C. de Boer ◽  
Roel Goldschmeding ◽  
Jaap A. Joles ◽  
...  

The chemokine RANTES (regulated upon activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted) is involved in the formation of an inflammatory infiltrate during glomerulonephritis. However, RANTES receptor inhibition, although reducing glomerular leukocyte infiltration, can also increase damage. We hypothesized that RANTES does not only promote the influx and activation of inflammatory leukocytes but also mediates glomerular microvascular repair by stimulating the homing of bone marrow (BM)-derived endothelial progenitor cells. To investigate the role of RANTES in the participation of BM-derived cells in glomerular vascular repair, we used a rat BM transplantation model in combination with reversible anti-Thy-1.1 glomerulonephritis. Twenty-four hours after the induction of glomerulonephritis, BM-transplanted rats were treated for 7 days with either the RANTES receptor antagonist Met-RANTES or saline. The participation of BM-derived endothelial cells in glomerular repair, glomerular monocyte infiltration, and proteinuria was evaluated at days 7 and 28. Furthermore, we used an in vitro perfusion chamber assay to study the role of RANTES receptors in shear-resistant adhesion of the CD34+ stem cells to activated endothelium under flow. In our reversible glomerulonephritis model, RANTES receptor inhibition specifically reduced the participation of BM-derived cells in glomerular vascular repair by more than 40% at day 7 without impairing monocyte influx. However, no obvious change in recovery from proteinuria or morphological damage was observed. Blockade of RANTES receptors on CD34+ cells in vitro partially inhibited platelet-enhanced, shear-resistant firm adhesion of the CD34+ cells to activated endothelium. In conclusion, our data suggest that RANTES is involved in the homing and participation of BM-derived endothelial cells in glomerular repair.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung In Baek ◽  
René R Packard ◽  
Arian Saffari ◽  
Zhao Ma ◽  
Anh P Luu ◽  
...  

Introduction: Exposure to ultrafine particles (UFP, d < 0.1 μm), redox-active components of particular matter (PM 2.5 ), promotes endothelial dysfunction. Notch signaling in endothelial cells (EC) regulates differentiation and proliferation of vasculature. FOXO1 interacts with Notch signaling by enhancing assembly of activation complex during induction of Notch signaling. Whether UFP impair vascular repair by modulating FOXO1/Notch signaling axis remains elusive. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that UFP impairs vascular repair by attenuating Notch signaling via inhibition on FOXO1. Methods and Results: Control transgenic Tg(fli1:gfp) zebrafish embryos underwent tail amputation at 3 days post fertilization (dpf) developed complete vascular repair at 3 days post amputation (dpa), whereas exposure to UFP, or treatment with ADAM10 inhibitor to prevent Notch activation, or micro-injection of dominant negative(DN) Notch1b mRNA disrupted vascular network and impaired regeneration (* P < 0.05, n=20). By crossing the Notch reporter line Tg(tp1:gfp) with the Tg(flk1:mCherry) line, we demonstrated UFP inhibits endothelial Notch signaling on the amputated site at 3 dpa. Micro-injection of NICD mRNA only partially rescued endothelial Notch activity and impaired vascular repair in the presence of UFP (* P < 0.05, n=20). FOXO1 MO significantly inhibited Notch signaling, mimicking the UFP-impaired vascular repair. Injection of FOXO1 mRNA accentuated Notch activity and rescued UFP-impaired vascular repair. In human aortic endothelial cells, UFP suppressed FOXO1 expression and the co-localization with NICD, but not Master-Mind Like 1(MAML) or active NICD expression (* P < 0.05, n=3). As a corollary, UFP exposure induced dose and time-dependent reduction in Notch reporter activity, FOXO1 mRNA expression and the expression of Notch signaling related genes including the Notch ligand Dll4 and Notch target HES1. (* P < 0.05, n=3). Conclusions: In conclusion, UFP attenuated FOXO1/Notch cooperation to modulate Notch signaling and impaired vascular repair in embryonic zebrafish.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (6) ◽  
pp. 1345-1352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Nichol ◽  
Heidi Stuhlmann

Abstract EGFL7 is a secreted angiogenic factor that is highly conserved in vertebrates. Most secreted angiogenic signaling molecules, including VEGF and fibroblast growth factor-2, are mainly expressed by nonendothelial cell types such as fibroblasts. In contrast, EGFL7 is unique because it is almost exclusively expressed by and acts on endothelial cells. Egfl7 expression is highest when the endothelium is in an active, proliferating state. This factor acts as a chemoattractant for endothelial cells and binds to components of the extracellular matrix. In vivo, Egfl7 is important for regulating tubulogenesis in zebrafish and for controlling vascular patterning and integrity in mice. Its function in blood vessel development is mediated, at least in part, through modulation of Notch signaling. In this review, we summarize the findings that support a role for Egfl7 in developmental and postnatal angiogenesis and describe the EGFL7-signaling pathways that underlie these processes. In addition, we discuss a potential role for EGFL7 in vascular repair and its possible use as a therapeutic target for treatment of hypoxia-induced injury. Finally, we consider EGFL7 action during tumorigenesis and its potential as an antiangiogenic agent.


Inflammation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 2003-2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asmahan Eloueyk ◽  
Bilal Osta ◽  
Rashad Alameldinne ◽  
Dania Awad

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiko Methe ◽  
Mamoru Nanasato ◽  
Anna-Maria Spognardi ◽  
Adam Groothuis ◽  
Elazer R. Edelman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document