Clinical Assessment and Surgical Treatment of Conductive Hearing Loss

Author(s):  
Alejandro I. Torres ◽  
Douglas D. Backous
2020 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Witold Szyfter ◽  
Wojciech Gawęcki ◽  
Anna Bartochowska ◽  
Andrzej Balcerowiak ◽  
Marta Pietraszek ◽  
...  

Introduction: Surgical treatment of otosclerosis has been a commonly accepted method of treatment for many years. The improvement of hearing after surgery is sometimes even spectacular, and good results are obtained in many centres in over 90% of the entire operated population. However, in the years following the procedure, some patients develop permanent or progressive conductive hearing loss. The aim of the study is to present a group of patients with conductive hearing loss that appeared after the first otosclerosis surgery and to analyse the causes of its occurrence. Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on patients who were first operated on in the years 2000-2009. Their medical records were analysed by the end of 2019, which made it possible to obtain results on at least 10 years of postoperative follow-up. The group consisted of 1118 patients, aged 14-82, including 802 women and 316 men. Results: Reoperations due to conductive hearing loss were performed on 93 patients, who accounted for 8.3% of the originally operated patients. They were much more often performed on patients after stapedectomies (19.7%) than on patients after stapedotomy (5.5%). Intraoperatively, prosthesis displacement was found to be the most frequent observation (44.1%) and was often associated with erosion or necrosis of the long process of incus (28%). Less frequent reasons of hearing loss were: adhesions around the prosthesis (10.8%), too small hole in the stapes footplate (8.6%), too short prosthesis (8.6%), progression of otosclerosis (7.5%), too long prosthesis (6.4%), presence of a granuloma around the prosthesis (5.4 %), and displacement of incus (4.3%). Conclusions: Surgical treatment in otosclerosis is a widely accepted and good method. It allows improvement in hearing in the vast majority of patients treated in this way. Unfortunately, over the years, some patients develop conductive hearing loss again. Reoperation gives a chance to find the cause and improve hearing in most of these cases.


2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (S3) ◽  
pp. S188-S188
Author(s):  
Pieter Kemp ◽  
Jiska van Stralen ◽  
Pim de Graaf ◽  
Erwin Berkhout ◽  
Jan Wolff ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 826-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rik C. Nelissen ◽  
Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus ◽  
Cor W. R. J. Cremers ◽  
Myrthe K. S. Hol ◽  
Ad F. M. Snik

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 030006052097228
Author(s):  
Yujie Liu ◽  
Ran Ren ◽  
Shouqin Zhao

The Bonebridge and Vibrant Soundbridge systems are semi-implanted hearing devices, which have been widely applied in patients with congenital conductive hearing loss. However, comparison between these two hearing devices is rare, especially in the same patient. We report a 23-year-old man who underwent successive implantation of Vibrant Soundbridge and Bonebridge devices in the same ear because of dysfunction of the Vibrant Soundbridge. We provide insight on the patient’s experience and compare the audiological and subjective outcomes of satisfaction.


1980 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRED H. BESS ◽  
G. W. MILLER ◽  
MICHAEL E. GLASSCOCK ◽  
GENE W. BRATT

2005 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-246
Author(s):  
Joni K. Doherty ◽  
Dennis R. Maceri

Proteus syndrome (PS) is a rare hamartomatous disorder characterized by mosaic overgrowth of multiple tissues that manifests early in life and is progressive. The presence of unilateral external auditory canal exostoses in a patient who is not a swimmer or surfer is suggestive of PS. However, hearing loss is not a typical feature. Here, we describe exostoses and ossicular discontinuity with conductive hearing loss in a patient with PS. The treatment consisted of canalplasty and ossicular chain reconstruction. A postoperative reduction was demonstrated in the patient's air-bone gap, from 21 dB to 13 dB for the pure tone average (four frequencies) and from 41 dB to 15 dB in the high-frequency range (6,000 to 8,000 Hz). Causes of ossicular discontinuity are discussed. Routine annual audiometric and otolaryngological evaluation should be considered in all patients with temporal bone inyolvement of PS.


2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 466-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Jeyakumar ◽  
Todd M. Brickman ◽  
Kim Murray ◽  
Paul Dutcher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document