Kinship Ties and the Preferred Adaptive Strategies of Urban Migrants11The original research reported in this chapter was conducted under a grant tendered by the Vocational Training Council, Government of New Zealand, to the Polynesian Advisory Committee and the Department of Management Studies, University of Auckland. Their support throughout this work is acknowledged with appreciation. The authors also want to thank the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California, and the National Science Foundation (BNS–76–22943) for providing a fellowship year (1977–1978) during which the more general implications of this work could be considered. The Center for South Pacific Studies, University of California at Santa Cruz, and the South Pacific Research Institute, Auckland, New Zealand, have also provided office space and logistical support during this work.

1980 ◽  
pp. 195-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
THEODORE D. GRAVES ◽  
NANCY B. GRAVES
Author(s):  
Eva-Marie Kröller

This chapter discusses national literary histories in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the South Pacific and summarises the book's main findings regarding the construction and revision of narratives of national identity since 1950. In colonial and postcolonial cultures, literary history is often based on a paradox that says much about their evolving sense of collective identity, but perhaps even more about the strains within it. The chapter considers the complications typical of postcolonial literary history by focusing on the conflict between collective celebration and its refutation. It examines three issues relating to the histories of English-language fiction in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the South Pacific: problems of chronology and beginnings, with a special emphasis on Indigenous peoples; the role of the cultural elite and the history wars in the Australian context; and the influence of postcolonial networks on historical methodology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document