The mere presence of a mobile phone: Does it influence driving performance?

2021 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 106226
Author(s):  
Priscilla Chee ◽  
Julia Irwin ◽  
Joanne M. Bennett ◽  
Ann J. Carrigan
Author(s):  
Steven J. Kass ◽  
Alex Jarstad ◽  
Lisa VanWormer

This study investigated the distracting effect that the mere presence of a mobile phone could have on simulated driving performance when drivers can hear a phone notification, but are unable to respond to it. A sample of 45 participants, categorized as either low or high mobile phone dependent, were randomly assigned to either a group that received a phone notification while driving in a simulator or to a control group. Both groups drove two scenarios, with the experimental group receiving, but not attending to, a phone call during the second scenario. Drivers who received the phone call veered off the road more often than drivers in the control group regardless of mobile phone dependency. Highly dependent drivers drove faster, were involved in more collisions, and drove over the centerline more frequently than less phone dependent drivers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioanna Spyropoulou ◽  
Maria Linardou

Mobile phone use while driving is a major cause of driver distraction, affecting driving performance and increasing accident risk. Governments have responded to this with the implementation of legislation prohibiting the use of mobile phones, under specific conditions, mainly adopting the hands-free use. Still, mobile phone is a cause of several types of distraction rather than just manual. This study explores the effect of mobile phone use while driving via a simulator experiment. Participants drive under various types of mobile phone use mode- namely, handheld, hands-free (wired earphone), and speaker to capture this effect. Results highlight the effect of mobile phone use, regardless of the use mode, on driving behaviour through specific indicators: maximum driving speed, reaction time, and lateral position. In particular, considering the aforementioned parameters the handheld mode demonstrates safer driving behaviour compared to the speaker mode. The results of this study stress the need for a reconsideration of the present legislation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-35
Author(s):  
John Courtright ◽  
SCOTT CAPLAN

This research reports the results of two meta-analyses on 43 empirical studies that have investigated the effects of the presence and use of mobile phones during interpersonal interactions.  Six of these investigations focused on the “mere presence effect,” which asserts that the presence (but not use) of a mobile phone leads to more negative perceptions of one’s interactional partner.  The meta-analysis did not provide support for this effect.  Thirty-seven studies focused on the effects of “phone snubbing” (“phubbing”) which addresses the use of a mobile phone during interactions.  This second meta-analysis found a relatively robust effect which clearly leads to more negative perceptions by the non-using partner.  Although numerous potential moderators were examined, none of theoretical interest were found to moderate these effects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 105945
Author(s):  
Natakorn Phuksuksakul ◽  
Kunnawee Kanitpong ◽  
Sunhapos Chantranuwathana

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 360-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios ◽  
Md. Mazharul Haque ◽  
Mark King ◽  
Simon Washington

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document