Bus crash risk evaluation: An adjusted framework and its application in a real network

2021 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 106258
Author(s):  
Benedetto Barabino ◽  
Michela Bonera ◽  
Giulio Maternini ◽  
Alessandro Olivo ◽  
Fabio Porcu
2021 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 106191
Author(s):  
Tong Liu ◽  
Zhibin Li ◽  
Pan Liu ◽  
Chengcheng Xu ◽  
David A. Noyce

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (09n10) ◽  
pp. 1555-1570
Author(s):  
Yanfang Yang ◽  
Yong Qin ◽  
Limin Jia ◽  
Honghui Dong

Accurate real-time crash risk evaluation is essential for making prevention strategy in order to proactively improve traffic safety. Quite a number of models have been developed to evaluate traffic crash risk by using real-time surveillance data. In this paper, the basic idea of traffic safety region is introduced into highway crash risk evaluation. Sequential forward selection (SFS), principal components analysis (PCA) and least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) are used to estimate the traffic safety region and classify the traffic states (safe condition and unsafe condition). The proposed method works by first extracting state variables from the observed traffic variables. Two statistics [Formula: see text] and squared prediction error (SPE) are calculated by SFS–PCA and used as the final state variables for traffic state space. Next, LSSVM is used to estimate the boundary of traffic safety region and identify the traffic states in the traffic state space. To demonstrate the advantage of the proposed method, this study develops two crash risk evaluation models, namely SFS–LSSVM model and PCA–LSSVM model, based on crash data and non-crash data collected on freeway I-880N in Alameda. Validation results show that the method is of reasonably high accuracy for identifying traffic states.


2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 12459-12469
Author(s):  
Lishengsa Yue ◽  
Mohamed A. Abdel-Aty ◽  
Yina Wu ◽  
Jinghui Yuan

Author(s):  
Peijie Wu ◽  
Xianghai Meng ◽  
Li Song ◽  
Wenze Zuo

Urban junctions usually present significant safety concerns, and the majority of all crashes in urban areas occur in or near junctions. Factors contributing to crash severity at junctions have been explored, but crash risk levels and crash severity patterns of different junction types have hardly been investigated. In order to fill this gap, this study analyzed the safety performance of six junction types and the factors contributing to crash severity, in order to assist city transportation authorities to implement effective countermeasures. Fault tree analysis (FTA) was applied for the risk evaluation of urban junctions and association rules (AR) algorithm was employed for the crash severity pattern analysis based on data from the U.K. STATS19 database from 2012 to 2016. Overall, four types of urban junctions with high crash risk level and over 4,000 AR contributing to crash severity are identified in the present paper. The results show that: (a) roundabouts and mini-roundabouts have the lowest fatality and casualty rates while T-junctions or staggered junctions and crossroads have the highest crash risk levels; (b) FTA may produce inaccurate outcomes because of incorrect logic gates, but AR can generate real potential relationships between crash severity and risk factors; (c) crash severity patterns are quite complex and the interdependence between risk factors is different for each junction type; (d) risk factors such as male driver, no physical crossing facilities within 50 meters, and give way or uncontrolled junction are common in high-risk junctions at night.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B. Voas ◽  
Terry A. Smith ◽  
David R. Thom ◽  
James McKnight ◽  
John W. Zellner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document