scholarly journals Grading mitral regurgitation using 4D-Flow CMR: Comparison to transthoracic echocardiography

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-252
Author(s):  
S. Ribeyrolles ◽  
J.L. Monin ◽  
A. Rohnean ◽  
C. Diakov ◽  
C. Caussin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
4D Flow ◽  
4D Flow Cmr

scholarly journals Grading mitral regurgitation using 4D flow CMR: comparison to transthoracic echocardiography

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ribeyrolles ◽  
J L Monin ◽  
A Rohnean ◽  
C Diakov ◽  
C Caussin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Observer Agreement ◽  
4D Flow ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
4D Flow Cmr ◽  
Optimal Thresholds ◽  
Initial Cohort

Abstract Background Mitral Regurgitation (MR) is currently primarily assessed using multiple transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) parameters. Two-dimensional Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) can be used in difficult cases but has limited agreement with TTE for quantifying MR. We hypothesized that 4D Flow CMR may help to quantify MR. Purpose To determine the 4D Flow CMR thresholds that achieve the best agreement with TTE for grading MR. Methods We conducted a single-center prospective study of patients evaluated for chronic primary MR in 2016–2020. MR was evaluated blindly by TTE and 4D Flow CMR respectively by two cardiologists and two radiologists with decades of experience. MR was graded with both methods as mild, moderate or severe. 4D Flow CMR measurements included MR regurgitant volume per beat (RV) and mitral anterograde flow per beat (MF). RF was obtained as the ratio RV/MF. Additionally, MF was compared to left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV) by cine-CMR. Results We included 33 patients in the initial cohort and 33 in the validation cohort. Inter-observer agreement was good for TTE and excellent for 4D Flow CMR. Agreement between MF and LVSV was excellent. Using recommended TTE thresholds (30 mL, 60 mL, 30%, 50%), agreement was moderate for RV and RF. The best agreement between 4D Flow CMR and TTE was obtained with CMR thresholds of 20 mL and 40 mL for RV (κ=0.93; 95% CI, 0.8–1) and 20% and 37% for RF (κ=0.90; 95% CI, 0.7–0.9). In the validation cohort, agreement between TTE and 4D Flow CMR was good with the optimal thresholds (κ= 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61–0.94). Conclusion We propose CMR thresholds that provide a good agreement between TTE and CMR for grading MR. Further studies are needed to fully validate 4D-Flow CMR accuracy for primary MR quantification. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Quantification of MR using 4D Flow CMR

scholarly journals Grading mitral regurgitation using 4D flow CMR: comparison to transthoracic echocardiography

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ribeyrolles ◽  
JL Monin ◽  
A Rohnean ◽  
C Diakov ◽  
C Caussin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Observer Agreement ◽  
4D Flow ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
4D Flow Cmr ◽  
Optimal Thresholds ◽  
Initial Cohort

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND Mitral Regurgitation (MR) is currently primarily assessed using multiple transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) parameters. Two-dimensional Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) can be used in difficult cases but has limited agreement with TTE for quantifying MR. We hypothesized that 4D Flow CMR may help to quantify MR. OBJECTIVES To determine the 4D Flow CMR thresholds that achieve the best agreement with TTE for grading MR. METHODS  We conducted a single-center prospective study of patients evaluated for chronic primary MR in 2016-2020. MR was evaluated blindly by TTE and 4D Flow CMR respectively by two cardiologists and two radiologists with decades of experience. MR was graded with both methods as mild, moderate or severe. 4D Flow CMR measurements included MR regurgitant volume per beat (RV) and mitral anterograde flow per beat (MF). RF was obtained as the ratio RV/MF. Additionally, MF was compared to left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV) by cine-CMR. RESULTS  We included 33 patients in the initial cohort and 33 in the validation cohort. Inter-observer agreement was good for TTE and excellent for 4D Flow CMR. Agreement between MF and LVSV was excellent. Using recommended TTE thresholds (30 mL, 60 mL, 30%, 50%), agreement was moderate for RV and RF. The best agreement between 4D Flow CMR and TTE was obtained with CMR thresholds of 20 mL and 40 mL for RV (κ=0.93; 95%CI, 0.8-1) and 20% and 37% for RF (κ=0.90; 95%CI, 0.7-0.9). In the validation cohort, agreement between TTE and 4D Flow CMR was good with the optimal thresholds (κ= 0.78; 95%CI, 0.61-0.94). CONCLUSION We propose CMR thresholds that provide a good agreement between TTE and CMR for grading MR. Further studies are needed to fully validate 4D-Flow CMR accuracy for primary MR quantification.

scholarly journals Mitral regurgitation quantification by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains reproducible between software solutions

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Ciaran Grafton-Clarke ◽  
George Thornton ◽  
Benjamin Fidock ◽  
Gareth Archer ◽  
Rod Hose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
4D Flow ◽  
4D Flow Cmr ◽  
Significant Bias ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Secondary Mr ◽  
Mr Quantification

Background: The reproducibility of mitral regurgitation (MR) quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging using different software solutions remains unclear. This research aimed to investigate the reproducibility of MR quantification between two software solutions: MASS (version 2019 EXP, LUMC, Netherlands) and CAAS (version 5.2, Pie Medical Imaging). Methods: CMR data of 35 patients with MR (12 primary MR, 13 mitral valve repair/replacement, and ten secondary MR) was used. Four methods of MR volume quantification were studied, including two 4D-flow CMR methods (MRMVAV and MRJet) and two non-4D-flow techniques (MRStandard and MRLVRV). We conducted within-software and inter-software correlation and agreement analyses. Results: All methods demonstrated significant correlation between the two software solutions: MRStandard (r=0.92, p<0.001), MRLVRV (r=0.95, p<0.001), MRJet (r=0.86, p<0.001), and MRMVAV (r=0.91, p<0.001). Between CAAS and MASS, MRJet and MRMVAV, compared to each of the four methods, were the only methods not to be associated with significant bias. Conclusions: We conclude that 4D-flow CMR methods demonstrate equivalent reproducibility to non-4D-flow methods but greater levels of agreement between software solutions.

scholarly journals Direct mitral regurgitation quantification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using 4D flow CMR jet tracking: evaluation in comparison to conventional CMR

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aakash N. Gupta ◽  
Ryan Avery ◽  
Gilles Soulat ◽  
Bradley D. Allen ◽  
Jeremy D. Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volumetric Method ◽  
Fair Agreement ◽  
Observer Agreement ◽  
4D Flow ◽  
Systolic Volume ◽  
4D Flow Cmr

Abstract Background Quantitative evaluation of mitral regurgitation (MR) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) relies on an indirect volumetric calculation. The aim of this study was to directly assess and quantify MR jets in patients with HCM using 4D flow CMR jet tracking in comparison to standard-of-care CMR indirect volumetric method. Methods This retrospective study included patients with HCM undergoing 4D flow CMR. By the indirect volumetric method from CMR, MR volume was quantified as left ventricular stroke volume minus forward aortic volume. By 4D flow CMR direct jet tracking, multiplanar reformatted planes were positioned in the peak velocity of the MR jet during systole to calculate through-plane regurgitant flow. MR severity was collected for agreement analysis from a clinical echocardiograms performed within 1 month of CMR. Inter-method and inter-observer agreement were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland–Altman analysis, and Cohen’s kappa. Results Thirty-seven patients with HCM were included. Direct jet tracking demonstrated good inter-method agreement of MR volume compared to the indirect volumetric method (ICC = 0.80, p = 0.004) and fair agreement of MR severity (kappa = 0.27, p = 0.03). Direct jet tracking showed higher agreement with echocardiography (kappa = 0.35, p = 0.04) than indirect volumetric method (kappa = 0.16, p = 0.35). Inter-observer reproducibility of indirect volumetric method components revealed the lowest reproducibility in end-systolic volume (ICC = 0.69, p = 0.15). Indirect volumetric method showed good agreement of MR volume (ICC = 0.80, p = 0.003) and fair agreement of MR severity (kappa = 0.38, p < 0.001). Direct jet tracking demonstrated (1) excellent inter-observer reproducibility of MR volume (ICC = 0.97, p < 0.001) and MR severity (kappa = 0.84, p < 0.001) and (2) excellent intra-observer reproducibility of MR volume (ICC = 0.98, p < 0.001) and MR severity (kappa = 0.88, p < 0.001). Conclusions Quantifying MR and assessing MR severity by indirect volumetric method in HCM patients has limited inter-observer reproducibility. 4D flow CMR jet tracking is a potential alternative technique to directly quantify and assess MR severity with excellent inter- and intra-observer reproducibility and higher agreement with echocardiography in this population.

scholarly journals Mitral regurgitation quantification by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains reproducible between software solutions

2022 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Ciaran Grafton-Clarke ◽  
George Thornton ◽  
Benjamin Fidock ◽  
Gareth Archer ◽  
Rod Hose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
4D Flow ◽  
4D Flow Cmr ◽  
Significant Bias ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Secondary Mr ◽  
Mr Quantification

Background: The reproducibility of mitral regurgitation (MR) quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging using different software solutions remains unclear. This research aimed to investigate the reproducibility of MR quantification between two software solutions: MASS (version 2019 EXP, LUMC, Netherlands) and CAAS (version 5.2, Pie Medical Imaging). Methods: CMR data of 35 patients with MR (12 primary MR, 13 mitral valve repair/replacement, and ten secondary MR) was used. Four methods of MR volume quantification were studied, including two 4D-flow CMR methods (MRMVAV and MRJet) and two non-4D-flow techniques (MRStandard and MRLVRV). We conducted within-software and inter-software correlation and agreement analyses. Results: All methods demonstrated significant correlation between the two software solutions: MRStandard (r=0.92, p<0.001), MRLVRV (r=0.95, p<0.001), MRJet (r=0.86, p<0.001), and MRMVAV (r=0.91, p<0.001). Between CAAS and MASS, MRJet and MRMVAV, compared to each of the four methods, were the only methods not to be associated with significant bias. Conclusions: We conclude that 4D-flow CMR methods demonstrate equivalent reproducibility to non-4D-flow methods but greater levels of agreement between software solutions.

scholarly journals Quantitative 4D Flow CMR analysis of intracardiac blood flow energetics in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Riva ◽  
A Camporeale ◽  
F Sturla ◽  
S Pica ◽  
L Tondi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Inverse Correlation ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
4D Flow ◽  
Anterior Myocardial Infarction ◽  
National Budget ◽  
4D Flow Cmr ◽  
Public Grant

Abstract Background Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is often associated with negative LV remodelling after myocardial infarction, sometimes resulting in impaired LV function and dilation (iDCM). 4D Flow CMR has been recently exploited to assess intracardiac hemodynamic changes in presence of LV remodelling. Purpose To quantify 4D Flow intracardiac kinetic energy (KE) and viscous energy loss (EL) and investigate their relation with LV dysfunction and remodelling. Methods Patients with prior anterior myocardial infarction underwent a CMR study with 4D Flow sequences acquisition; they were divided into ICM (n=10) and iDCM (n=10, EDV&gt;208 ml and EF&lt;40%). 10 controls were used for comparison. LV was semi-automatically segmented using short axis CMR stacks and co-registered with 4D Flow. Global KE and EL were computed over the cardiac cycle. NT-proBNP measurements were correlated with average and peak values, during systole and diastole. Results Both LV volume and EF significantly differ (P&lt;0.0001) between iDCM (EDV=294±56 ml, EF=24±8%), ICM (EDV=181±32 ml, EF=34±6%) and controls (EDV=124±29 ml, EF=72±5%). If compared to controls, both ICM and iDCM showed significantly lower KE (P≤0.0008); though lower than controls, EL was higher in iDCM than ICM. Within the iDCM subgroup, diastolic mean KE and peak EL reported good inverse correlation with NT-proBNP (r=−0.75 and r=−0.69, respectively). EL indexed (ELI) to average KE during systole was higher in the entire ischemic group as compared to controls (ELI(ischemic) = 0.17 vs. ELI(controls) = 0.10, P=0.0054). Conclusions 4D Flow analyses effectively mapped post-ischemic LV energetic changes, highlighting the disproportionate intraventricular EL relative to produced KE; preliminary good correlation between LV energetic changes and NT-proBNP will deserve further investigation in order to contribute to early detection of heart failure. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Italian Ministry of Health

scholarly journals Stent interventions for pulmonary artery stenosis improve bi-ventricular flow efficiency in a swine model

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Pewowaruk ◽  
Gregory P. Barton ◽  
Cody Johnson ◽  
J. Carter Ralphe ◽  
Christopher J. Francois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Pulmonary Artery ◽  
Ventricular Function ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Pulmonary Artery Stenosis ◽  
Swine Model ◽  
4D Flow ◽  
4D Flow Cmr ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Branch pulmonary artery (PA) stenosis (PAS) commonly occurs in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Prior studies have documented technical success and clinical outcomes of PA stent interventions for PAS but the impact of PA stent interventions on ventricular function is unknown. The objective of this study was to utilize 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to better understand the impact of PAS and PA stenting on ventricular contraction and ventricular flow in a swine model of unilateral branch PA stenosis. Methods 18 swine (4 sham, 4 untreated left PAS, 10 PAS stent intervention) underwent right heart catheterization and CMR at 20 weeks age (55 kg). CMR included ventricular strain analysis and 4D flow CMR. Results 4D flow CMR measured inefficient right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) flow patterns in the PAS group (RV non-dimensional (n.d.) vorticity: sham 82 ± 47, PAS 120 ± 47; LV n.d. vorticity: sham 57 ± 5, PAS 78 ± 15 p < 0.01) despite the PAS group having normal heart rate, ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume. The intervention group demonstrated increased ejection fraction that resulted in more efficient ventricular flow compared to untreated PAS (RV n.d. vorticity: 59 ± 12 p < 0.01; LV n.d. vorticity: 41 ± 7 p < 0.001). Conclusion These results describe previously unknown consequences of PAS on ventricular function in an animal model of unilateral PA stenosis and show that PA stent interventions improve ventricular flow efficiency. This study also highlights the sensitivity of 4D flow CMR biomarkers to detect earlier ventricular dysfunction assisting in identification of patients who may benefit from PAS interventions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document