scholarly journals Advancing Smart Building Readiness: Automated Metadata Extraction Using Neural Language Processing Methods

2021 ◽  
pp. 100041
Author(s):  
David Waterworth ◽  
Subbu Sethuvenkatraman ◽  
Quan Z. Sheng
Keyword(s):  
Language Processing ◽  
Processing Methods ◽  
Smart Building ◽  
Metadata Extraction

Fast Neural Network Engine for Natural Science Language Processing: A Drug-Search Case.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vadim V. Korolev ◽  
Artem Mitrofanov ◽  
Kirill Karpov ◽  
Valery Tkachenko
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Natural Science ◽  
Therapeutic Agent ◽  
Semantic Relations ◽  
Chemical Data ◽  
Processing Methods ◽  
Modern Natural

The main advantage of modern natural language processing methods is a possibility to turn an amorphous human-readable task into a strict mathematic form. That allows to extract chemical data and insights from articles and to find new semantic relations. We propose a universal engine for processing chemical and biological texts. We successfully tested it on various use-cases and applied to a case of searching a therapeutic agent for a COVID-19 disease by analyzing PubMed archive.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Financial Considerations Documented in Primary Care Encounters as Identified by Natural Language Processing Methods

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. e1910399
Author(s):  
Meliha Skaljic ◽  
Ihsaan H. Patel ◽  
Amelia M. Pellegrini ◽  
Victor M. Castro ◽  
Roy H. Perlis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Processing Methods

scholarly journals A Comparison of Natural Language Processing Methods for Automated Coding of Motivational Interviewing

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Tanana ◽  
Kevin A. Hallgren ◽  
Zac E. Imel ◽  
David C. Atkins ◽  
Vivek Srikumar
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Motivational Interviewing ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Processing Methods ◽  
Automated Coding

scholarly journals Natural Language Processing methods for Document Matching

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 379-383
Author(s):  
Maitri Patel and Dr Hemant D Vasava
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Original Work ◽  
Educational Systems ◽  
Processing Methods ◽  
Similar Test ◽  
Subject Examination ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Higher Educational

Data,Information or knoweldge,in this rapidly moving and growing world.we can find any kind of information on Internet.And this can be too useful,however for acedemic world too it is useful but along with it plagarism is highly in practice.Which makes orginality of work degrade and fraudly using someones original work and later not acknowleging them is becoming common.And some times teachers or professors could not identify the plagarised information provided.So higher educational systems nowadays use different types of tools to compare.Here we have an idea to match no of different documents like assignments of students to compare with each other to find out, did they copied each other’s work?Also an idea to compare ideal answeer sheet of particular subject examination to similar test sheets of students.Idea is to compare and on similarity basis we can rank them.Both approach is one kind and that is to compare documents.To identify plagarism there are many methods used already.So we could compare and develop them if needed.

scholarly journals Topic Modeling for Keyword Extraction: using Natural Language Processing methods for keyword extraction in Portal Min@s

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaldo Candido Junior ◽  
Célia Magalhães ◽  
Helena Caseli ◽  
Régis Zangirolami
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Topic Modeling ◽  
Latent Dirichlet Allocation ◽  
Keyword Extraction ◽  
Processing Methods ◽  
Dirichlet Allocation

<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 100%;" align="justify"> </p><p>Este artigo tem o objetivo da avaliar a aplicação de dois métodos automáticos eficientes na extração de palavras-chave, usados pelas comunidades da Linguística de <em>Corpus </em>e do Processamento da Língua Natural para gerar palavras-chave de textos literários: o <em>WordSmith Tools </em>e o <em>Latent Dirichlet Allocation </em>(LDA). As duas ferramentas escolhidas para este trabalho têm suas especificidades e técnicas diferentes de extração, o que nos levou a uma análise orientada para a sua performance. Objetivamos entender, então, como cada método funciona e avaliar sua aplicação em textos literários. Para esse fim, usamos análise humana, com conhecimento do campo dos textos usados. O método LDA foi usado para extrair palavras-chave por meio de sua integração com o <em>Portal Min@s: Corpora de Fala e Escrita</em>, um sistema geral de processamento de <em>corpora</em>, concebido para diferentes pesquisas de Linguística de <em>Corpus</em>. Os resultados do experimento confirmam a eficácia do WordSmith Tools e do LDA na extração de palavras-chave de um <em>corpus </em>literário, além de apontar que é necessária a análise humana das listas em um estágio anterior aos experimentos para complementar a lista gerada automaticamente, cruzando os resultados do WordSmith Tools e do LDA. Também indicam que a intuição linguística do analista humano sobre as listas geradas separadamente pelos dois métodos usados neste estudo foi mais favorável ao uso da lista de palavras-chave do WordSmith Tools.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document