Sensation seeking to marijuana use: Exploring the mediating roles of risk appraisal and social norms

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 76-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy C. Barnum ◽  
Todd Armstrong
1987 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 753-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.L. Rowland ◽  
T. Heatherton

2016 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria L. Roditis ◽  
Kevin Delucchi ◽  
Audrey Chang ◽  
Bonnie Halpern-Felsher

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla J. Berg ◽  
David B. Buller ◽  
Gillian L. Schauer ◽  
Michael Windle ◽  
Erin Stratton ◽  
...  

Recent changes in policy and social norms related to marijuana use have increased its use and concern about how/where marijuana should be used. We aimed to characterize rules regarding marijuana and its use in homes. We recruited 1,567 US adults aged 18–34 years through Facebook advertisements to complete an online survey assessing marijuana use, social factors, perceptions of marijuana, and rules regarding marijuana and its use in the home, targeting tobacco and marijuana users to ensure the relevance of this topic. Overall, 648 (41.6%) were current marijuana users; 46.0% of participants reported that “marijuana of any type is not allowed in their home or on their property.” Of those allowing marijuana on their property, 6.4% prohibiteduseof marijuana in their home. Of the remainder, 29.2% prohibitedsmokingmarijuana, and 11.0% prohibitedvaping, eating, or drinkingmarijuana. Correlates of more restrictive rules included younger age, being female, having <Bachelor’s degree, not having parents or people living with them who use marijuana, perceiving use to be less socially acceptable and more harmful, and being a nonuser (p’s<.05). Attitudes and subjective norms regarding marijuana are correlates of allowing marijuana in residential settings. Future work should examine areas of risk regarding household marijuana rules.


Author(s):  
Karma McKelvey ◽  
Shivani Mathur Gaiha ◽  
Kevin L. Delucchi ◽  
Bonnie Halpern-Felsher

AbstractHealth behavior theorists and prevention researchers use a variety of measures of adolescent and young adult (AYA) risk and benefit perceptions to predict tobacco-use and marijuana-use behaviors. However, studies have not examined whether and how perception measures that ask about likelihood of more general outcomes such as “harm” versus ask about specific risk or benefit outcomes compare or whether they differentially predict AYA willingness to use if one of your best friends were to offer it and intentions to use in the next year; and if these measures have differential ability to predict actual use of tobacco and marijuana. We used data from a prospective cohort of California AYAs to create and test new scales to measure perceptions of specific health and social outcomes related to risks (e.g., smell bad) and benefits (e.g., look cool) related to tobacco and marijuana, and then addressed three questions: (1) Whether and how measures of perceptions of specific social and health risks and benefits (for our purposes “specific measures”) and measures of perceived general harm are differentially associated with measures of willingness, social norms, and intentions to use? (2) Are specific versus general measures differentially associated with and predictive of tobacco and cannabis use behavior? (3) Are specific perceptions measures differentially predictive of behavior compared to measures of willingness, social norms, and behavioral intentions? Our results demonstrate that to better predict AYA tobacco and marijuana use, measures that address general outcomes, such as harmfulness, as well as willingness and behavioral intention should be used. We also found that measures of specific perceived risks (short-term, long-term, social) and benefits were unrelated and correlated differently with different products. For example, adolescents perceived both risks and benefits from using products like e-cigarettes, and perceived greater risk from smokeless tobacco compared to combustible cigarettes. These findings indicate that measures of specific perceived social and health outcomes can be useful to discern nuanced differences in motivation for using different substances. Study implications are important for survey dimension-reduction and assessing relationships among perceptions, motivations, and use of tobacco and marijuana products.


2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 2250-2264
Author(s):  
Alexander M. Wasserman ◽  
K. J. Shaw-Meadow ◽  
T. J. Moon ◽  
T. E. Karns-Wright ◽  
C. W. Mathias ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document