Spectral assessment of drought tolerance indices and grain yield in advanced spring wheat lines grown under full and limited water irrigation

2017 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salah E. El-Hendawy ◽  
Wael M. Hassan ◽  
Nasser A. Al-Suhaibani ◽  
Urs Schmidhalter
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (32) ◽  
pp. 11-21
Author(s):  
ali eftekhari ◽  
amin baghizadeh ◽  
rooholah abdshahi ◽  
mohamad mehdi yaghubi ◽  
◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Álvaro de Oliveira Santos ◽  
Renzo Garcia Von Pinho ◽  
Vander Fillipe de Souza ◽  
Lauro José Moreira Guimarães ◽  
Márcio Balestre ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Habib ◽  
Md Mannan ◽  
Md Karim ◽  
Md Miah ◽  
Hari Singh

Abstract Crop productivity is greatly affected by drought stress. Understanding the drought tolerance capability of the crop varieties available in a country is the foremost consideration for drought adaptation. The objective of this research work was to examine the drought tolerance potentiality of 5 cultivated barley varieties (BARI Barley5, BARI Barley6, BARI Barley7, BARI Barley8 and BARI Barley9) through calculating drought tolerance indices. A completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications was followed in the experiment, where crops were grown under control (80% of FC) and water deficit environment (50% of FC). Stress Tolerance (TOL), Mean Productivity (MP), Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP), Stress Susceptibility Index (SSI), Stress Tolerance Index (STI), Harmonic Mean (HAM), Yield Index (YI) and Yield Stability Index (YSI) were calculated based on grain yield under control and drought conditions. BARI Barley7 and BARI Barley8 were the most tolerant variety and BARI Barley9 considered as susceptible based on TOL and SSI. Drought tolerance indices like MP, HAM, GMP, TOL as well as STI were showed a high correlation with grain yield under both conditions and were recognized as appropriate indices to identify varieties with high grain yield and low sensitivity to drought stress.


2020 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Sara KHOSRAVI ◽  
Reza AZIZINEZHAD ◽  
Amin BAGHIZADEH ◽  
Mahmood MALEKI

<p>This study was carried out on grain yield in wheat genotypes with the aim of assessing genetic potential of drought tolerance. The experiment was performed as split plot in the form of randomized complete block design with three replications under normal and drought stress conditions with 32 genotypes. Based on grain yield, and under the condition of non-stress and drought stress, 5 drought tolerance indices are estimated including Tolerance Index (TOL), Stress Tolerance (STI), Mean Productivity (MP), Geometric Mean (GMP) and, Harmonic Mean (HM) for all kinds of genotypes. The analysis of yield correlation and drought tolerance indices in two environments indicated that STI, MP, GMP, HM indices were the most suitable parameters for screening wheat genotypes. Principal components analysis exhibited that the 83 % of first principal component and the 15 % of second one justified the variation of the initial data. Drawing bi-plot diagram declared that Sabalan, Shabrang, Aria, Azar, Azadi, and T2 genotypes were highly functional and resistant to drought stress.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Pooran GOLKAR ◽  
Esmaeil HAMZEH ◽  
Seyed Ali Mohammad MIRMOHAMMADY MAIBODY

<p>Improvement of elite safflower genotypes for drought-tolerance is hampered by a deficiency of effective selection criteria. The present study evaluated 100 genotypes of safflower in terms of their drought tolerance over a period of three years (2016–2018) under both non-stress and drought-stress conditions. The eight drought-tolerance indices of tolerance index (TOL), mean productivity (MP), geometric mean productivity (GMP), stress susceptibility index (SSI), stress tolerance index (STI), yield stability index (YSI), drought resistance index (DI), and harmonic mean (HARM) were calculated based on seed yield under drought (Y<sub>s</sub>) and non-drought (Y<sub>p</sub>) conditions. A high genetic variation was found in drought tolerance among the genotypes studied. The MP, GMP, and STI indices were able to discriminate between tolerant and drought-sensitive genotypes. Plots of the first and second principal components identified drought-tolerant genotypes averaged over the three study years. Cluster analysis divided the genotypes into three distinct groups using the drought tolerance indices. Ultimately, eight genotypes (namely, G<sub>3</sub>, G<sub>11</sub>, G<sub>13</sub>, G<sub>24</sub>, G<sub>33</sub>, G<sub>47</sub>, G<sub>58</sub>, and G<sub>61</sub>) from different origins were detected as more tolerant to drought stress suitable for use in safflower breeding programs in drought-affected areas. The most tolerant and susceptible genotypes could be exploited to produce mapping populations for drought tolerance breeding programs in safflower.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document