The relationship between ocular trauma and substance abuse in emergency department patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1734-1737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia L. Chang ◽  
Vaama Patel ◽  
John Giltner ◽  
Richard Lee ◽  
Catherine A. Marco
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Allison Tadros ◽  
Melinda Sharon ◽  
Michael Crum ◽  
Ryan Johnson ◽  
Kimberly Quedado ◽  
...  

Background. Patients who are suicidal commonly seek care in the emergency department (ED). Few studies have examined the coexistence between suicidal ideation, substance abuse, and psychiatric diagnosis. Objectives. This study sought to determine how often suicidal ED patients have coexisting substance abuse and psychiatric diagnosis in addition to describing the characteristics of target population. Methods. In this retrospective cohort study, chart reviews were conducted of patients over 12 with suicidal ideation who presented to an academic ED from October 2016 to March 2017. Data abstracted included gender, age, insurance, prior psychiatric diagnoses, substances abused, presence of a suicide attempt, prior suicidality, number of ED visits in the prior year, and disposition. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated. Results. There were 427 patient visits to the ED for suicidality during the study period, of which 54% were male, with a mean age of 34 years. Most patients (92%) had a psychiatric diagnosis, most commonly depression (67%). More than one psychiatric diagnosis was reported in 51% of patients, while 8% had no reported underlying psychiatric diagnosis. Substance abuse was reported in 58% of patients, including marijuana (42%) and opioids (41%). Polysubstance abuse was reported in 42%. Approximately half of the patients had three or more ED visits in the previous 12 months. Most patients were insured by Medicaid (51%), while 59% were admitted for inpatient treatment. Conclusion. Substance abuse and psychiatric diagnosis were reported frequently among patients presenting to the ED with suicidal ideation, often involving more than one substance/diagnosis. Future studies should be aimed at evaluating the relationship between these conditions and determining how to better care for this population.


2010 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland C. Merchant ◽  
Sarah M. Freelove ◽  
Thomas J. Langan ◽  
Melissa A. Clark ◽  
Kenneth H. Mayer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-94
Author(s):  
Milan L. Ridderikhof ◽  
Donica V. Lodder ◽  
Susan Van Dieren ◽  
Philipp Lirk ◽  
Helma Goddijn ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground and aimsPrevious studies have described the phenomenon of oligo-analgesia in Emergency Department patients with traumatic injuries, despite the high prevalence of pain among these patients. Besides aspects related to health care staff, patient related factors might also play a role in suboptimal pain treatment, however evidence is scarce. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to evaluate patient related factors in adult patients refusing offered analgesics during an Emergency Department presentation with extremity injuries.MethodsThis was a case control study in the Emergency Department of a level 1 Trauma Centre. Cases were defined as adult patients with an extremity injury who declined analgesia, when offered. They were matched to controls from the same population, who accepted analgesics, in a 1:2 ratio using gender as matching variable. Primary outcome was difference in NRS pain score. Secondary outcomes were the relationship between categorical severity of pain scores and refusal of analgesics, exploration of independent predictors of analgesia refusal utilizing multivariate logistic regression and the evaluation of eight beliefs among patients who refuse analgesics.ResultsBetween August 1st and 31st 2016, a total of 253 patients were eligible for inclusion of whom 55 declined analgesic treatment. They were included as cases and matched to 110 controls. Difference in median NRS pain score was significant between the groups: 5.0 (IQR 3.0–8.0) vs. 8.0 (IQR 6.0–9.0), respectively (p < 0.01). Nearly 20% of patients with severe pain declined analgesics, compared to 41% with moderate and 69% with mild pain (p < 0.01). The NRS pain score was the only independent predictor of refusal of analgesic treatment with a mean Odds Ratio of 0.67 (95%-CI 0.54–0.83). Most common patients’ beliefs were that pain medication should be used in extreme pain only, fear of decreasing the doctor’s ability to judge the injury and fear of addiction to analgesics.ConclusionsPain severity is the single independent predictor of refusal of analgesia, however the following patient beliefs are important as well: pain medication should be used in extreme pain only; fear of decreasing the doctor’s ability to judge the injury and the fear of becoming addicted to pain medication.ImplicationsIn case patients refuse offered analgesics, the health care provider should actively address patient beliefs that might exist and lead to suboptimal pain treatment.


CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice Mowbray ◽  
Audrey-Anne Brousseau ◽  
Eric Mercier ◽  
Don Melady ◽  
Marcel Émond ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackgroundThe 2016 Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) updates introduced frailty screening within triage to more accurately code frail patients who may deteriorate waiting for care. The relationship between triage acuity and frailty is not well understood, but may help inform which supplemental geriatric assessments are beneficial to support care in the emergency department (ED). Our objectives were to investigate the relationship between triage acuity and frailty, and to compare their associations with a series of patient outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the Canadian cohort from a multinational prospective study. Data were collected on ED patients 75 years of age and older from eight ED sites across Canada between November 2009 and April 2012. Triage acuity was assigned using the CTAS, whereas frailty was measured using an ED frailty index. Spearman rank and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations.ResultsA total of 2,153 ED patients were analyzed. No association was found between the CTAS and ED frailty index scores assigned to patients (r = .001; p = 0.99). The ED frailty index was associated with hospital admission (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4–1.6), hospital length of stay (OR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.2–1.6), future hospitalization (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.05–1.2), and ED recidivism (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.04–1.2). The CTAS was associated with hospital admission (e.g., CTAS 2 v. 5; OR = 6; 95% CI = 3.3–11.4).ConclusionOur findings demonstrate that frailty and triage acuity are independent but complementary measures. EDs may benefit from comprehensive frailty screening post-triage, as frailty and its associated geriatric syndromes drive outcomes separate from traditional measures of acuity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-199
Author(s):  
Mark B. Reed ◽  
Susan I. Woodruff ◽  
Megan Holt ◽  
Gerard DeMers ◽  
Michael Mattuecci ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-334
Author(s):  
Zev Wiener ◽  
David Te-Wei Chiu ◽  
Nathan Ivan Shapiro ◽  
Shamai Aron Grossman

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Bacaner ◽  
Terry A. Kinney ◽  
Michelle Biros ◽  
Shelli Bochert ◽  
Nadov Casuto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document